Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The man to replace Damian McKenzie in the All Blacks' World Cup squad

Damian McKenzie. (Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

Since news broke that Damian McKenzie’s ruptured ACL has ruled him out of World Cup contention, one question has continued to burn on the public’s mind: who will replace him in the All Blacks‘ squad in Japan later this year?

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a question that nobody really knows the answer to just yet, probably not even the All Blacks selectors themselves.

The distance between the incumbent group of first-fives – Beauden Barrett, Richie Mo’unga and McKenzie – and the rest of the playmakers in New Zealand is substantial.

However, Steve Hansen and his assistants, Ian Foster and Grant Fox, are now tasked with getting someone up to speed with just half a Super Rugby season, a condensed Rugby Championship, Bledisloe Cup and a one-off test against Tonga at their disposal.

Plenty of names have been flung around in the wake of McKenzie’s season-ending knee injury as the search for a player worthy of filling the 23-year-old’s boots ramps up.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwQoewQgw2T/

The complexity of the search is enhanced given that McKenzie has been listed as a first-five most times he’s been named in All Blacks sides since his test debut in 2016, but the role that he predominantly plays as a fullback adds an extra dimension to the selection conundrum.

Do the selectors pick a first-five that is under-skilled at test match level but adds depth to arguably the most important position in the squad, or do they opt to pick up another outside back who will probably have more experience and ability, but will leave the All Blacks undermanned at first-five with just two clear cut options in Barrett and Mo’unga?

ADVERTISEMENT

While there are plenty of legitimate outside back options that can be used to alleviate the loss of McKenzie, it seems difficult to envisage the All Blacks selectors running the risk of taking just two first-fives to Japan, especially given their history of injuries in that position at previous World Cups.

The possibility of either Barrett or Mo’unga burning out by the play-off stages after throwing them into the mix against Italy, Canada and Namibia surely cannot be worth it.

So, while any one of Waisake Naholo, George Bridge, Nehe Milner-Skudder, David Havili, Braydon Ennor and Will Jordan could be thrown a lifeline via McKenzie’s injury, it seems a first-five needs to be called up to preserve and correctly manage the country’s premier two playmakers.

Blues pivot Otere Black looms as the most composed and in-form first-five left in the nation behind Barrett and Mo’unga, but is he really ready for test match rugby, let alone a World Cup?

ADVERTISEMENT

As a distributing first-five with a consistent boot and minimal running game, he’s a solid yet unspectacular option should the All Blacks be required to call upon him.

He’s made seven appearances for the Maori All Blacks, but if McKenzie hadn’t sustained this long-term injury at such an inconvenient time, that is likely where Black would have been confined to in the international arena as he lacks the x-factor value that separates Barrett, Mo’unga and McKenzie apart from the rest of the country.

Although he’s the only other first-five in New Zealand with test match experience, Brett Cameron has had limited game time at the Crusaders this year behind Mo’unga, and was shocking in his only start of the season against the Waratahs in Sydney last month.

That match showed he still has plenty of developing to undergo, which can also be said of Josh Ioane, Mitch Hunt and Damian’s older brother Marty, all of whom may come into consideration due to their positional flexibility thanks to their playing ability at fullback, just like the younger McKenzie.

Despite there being multiple options available to the All Blacks selectors, no first-five in New Zealand really stands out as a suitable replacement who could seamlessly slot into the squad if need be.

Barrett, Mo’unga and McKenzie all have aspects to their game that makes both them and the All Blacks world class at their craft, and none of the chasing pack can say they also possess such qualities.

That leads to the next question: should Hansen, Foster and Fox be looking outside of New Zealand to bolster their first-five stocks at such a time of need?

As a rugby nation that is staunchly opposed to the concept of picking foreign-based players for their national side, it is understandable why many Kiwis would be opposed to such a proposition.

As soon as the door is opened for overseas players – especially European-based ones – to be selected for the All Blacks, the floodgates will open as a mass exodus ensues, effectively making Super Rugby an under-23 development competition.

But, as was shown late last year, the All Blacks selectors aren’t entirely opposed to the idea of selecting a non-New Zealand-based player when in desperate times.

Sam Cane’s broken neck injury last October forced Hansen to call up Matt Todd from the Japanese Top League for the All Blacks’ end-of -year tour, as he wasn’t comfortable with entrusting any other openside flanker in the country aside from Ardie Savea and new cap Dalton Papali’i.

As is the case now in the first-five position, there were other viable options to fill the role at number seven through Dillon Hunt, Gareth Evans (both played in the Japan test but were excluded from the European leg of the tour), James Lentjes and – had he been uninjured – Blake Gibson, but Hansen looked offshore to plug the gap left by Cane, and filled it with the Japan-based Todd.

It was a first for the All Blacks to make such a selection, and given the proximity and similar season structure Japan has with New Zealand via the Sunwolves in Super Rugby and the Top League played at the backend of the year alongside the Mitre 10 Cup, it wouldn’t be too much of a surprise to see it happen again.

But which Japanese-based New Zealander would provide more security as a third-string first-five at a World Cup through his experience and ability than any other domestically-based player?

Look no further than Hayden Parker.

Yes, he’s an uncapped 28-year-old who was shunned by all five New Zealand Super Rugby franchises after a five-season spell with the Highlanders came to a close due to a prolonged run of injuries, but all five franchises – except for maybe the Crusaders, who have admirable depth in almost every position – would have significantly benefitted from Parker’s presence in their squads.

The same can be said for the All Blacks following McKenzie’s injury news, such is the vein of form Parker has found himself in since being picked up by the Sunwolves for the 2018 campaign.

His miraculous goal-kicking form has been the subject of much praise over the course of the past two seasons, knocking over 77 of his last 80 kicks at goal to catapult himself into the conversation as one of the greatest goal-kickers we have ever seen.

While his kicking in general play is also noteworthy thanks to the influence of long-time mentor Tony Brown, Parker’s talents aren’t confined to just his boot, as his ability to spark and dictate the Sunwolves’ infamous helter-skelter brand of rugby makes him an integral figure within the Tokyo-based squad.

If anyone needs evidence of Parker’s playmaking prowess, his sensational showing against the Reds in the Japanese capital last year exemplified all the quality he possesses.

The Kurow-born pivot scored a try, five conversions and seven penalties to accumulate 36 points in a 63-28 rout of the Queenslanders last May, becoming the highest-ever New Zealand point-scorer in a Super Rugby match and the fourth-highest in Super Rugby history.

It was a sublime display of all-round skill, and just a week later, he illustrated the ‘clutch’ facet of his game with an 85th-minute drop goal to snatch a 26-23 win against the Stormers in Hong Kong.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwTitVgAMZZ/

These attributes have made Parker arguably the most important player in the Sunwolves squad, and once the franchise dissolves after next year’s Super Rugby campaign, the Kobe Steelers first-five can expect to receive offers worldwide for his services.

However, if Hansen is willing to tweak the eligibility laws for the second time in less than 12 months, Parker could expect an offer to return to New Zealand sooner than 2020 given his proven track record in handling the rigours and pressures cast upon him at Super Rugby level.

Obviously, the challenge of a World Cup surmounts that of anything Super Rugby could conjure up, but Parker has been on the professional scene since his ITM Cup debut in 2010, and has the experience, confidence and ability that no other New Zealand first-five currently wields.

To call upon a foreign-based player might be considered by some as the beginning of a downward spiral in the quality of New Zealand rugby, but there can surely be no harm in selecting a Kiwi still plying his trade in Super Rugby, proving his worth against all other All Blacks contenders.

The worth that Parker has proven for himself supersedes that of all other All Blacks first-five candidates in Super Rugby right now, and with a World Cup spot needing to be taken following the ill-fortune of Damian McKenzie, Parker could well be the man to offset McKenzie’s absence.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search