Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The modern-day midfielder - how rugby's most demanding position is asking for more

The modern-day midfielder requires a special type of athlete and player. (Photos/Gettys Images)

Never before has one position been required to do so much, or at least be capable of doing so much.

The modern-day midfielder, in particular the outside centre, has been the subject of transformation in the last decade morphing into a collection of multiple positions.

ADVERTISEMENT

The athlete profile is demanding, it requires a specimen who can dash 40-metres in 5-seconds, but also power lift or bench press as much as a front rower. Combine the speed and acceleration of a winger, the distribution skills of a flyhalf, the strength and endurance of a loose forward not to mention the ability to diagnose and recover from disadvantageous situations in defence.

The non-negotiables for the position are growing, shaping a new breed of midfielder and pushing one-dimensional talents elsewhere as the game’s requirements change.

Consider England’s midfield mix that Eddie Jones has settled on earlier this year – Manu Tuilagi, the prototype power-running centre of the Noughties, has found a new home at 12 while the skillful, balanced playmaker Henry Slade is the preferred option at 13.

This has ignited England’s backline play and opened up far more opportunities for the outside backs like Elliot Daly, Jack Nowell and Jonny May, many of whom are also versatile multi-positional assets themselves. With the addition of Scott Wisemantel, England’s attack has been far more prolific and potent over the last 12-months.

Slade’s diverse skill set includes better ball-handling, ball-playing ability, and an attacking kicking game while being more agile, faster and fitter than Tuilagi. His game has been shaped by playing many positions in the backline earlier in his career, including fullback and flyhalf. As his body has matured in size, he is now the perfect model for this new breed of 13 whose value is only just now being fully understood.

Now more than ever midfield defence is about spacial coverage, not about forceful collisions and big hits. It is geared for ‘space eaters’ with multi-directional speed who can go sideline-to-sideline to close overlaps or rush up and bring pressure and take time away.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://www.instagram.com/p/BtdE9ERg1zy/

As long as they have good technique to close the tackle at a high completion rate, they don’t need ribcage-rattling physicality to belt the opposition. They need to be more adept at body position and understand leverage in the way NFL cornerbacks do, and then complete tackles from a wide variety of angles.

Slade and Ireland’s Garry Ringrose are some of the best examples of centres who do this. Their elite conditioning allows for high-line defence on high percentage of phases, with a deep capacity to re-load and bring heat time and time again for the full eighty. They can jockey-off and backpeddle to save situations, recover from the inside to chase down outside runners or simply put the front-on spot tackle on.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BtiFlm6Aw0P/

The advancement of structured phase play in attack has bought rise to the idea of multiple first receivers who play a traditional flyhalf role. It has become an interchangeable part.

ADVERTISEMENT

Consider the Crusaders’ first receiving usage: Richie Mo’unga takes the lion share with anywhere between 30 to 40% but midfielders Ryan Crotty and Jack Goodhue combine for around 25% of the touches as secondary options.

Distribution skills are absolutely necessary as the midfielders are called on to relieve first receiving duties when the flyhalf is tackled or caught at the breakdown. Without an honed an accurate passing game, run-first centres won’t be able to operate in teams that play in possession-based rugby structures.

There are some tremendous physical athletes at outside centre who can make game-breaking runs – Huw Jones, Jesse Kriel, Samu Kerevi, Jonathan Davies. All are quality players but would be considered in the second tier of 13’s behind Goodhue, Crotty, Slade and Ringrose who have more accuracy in other facets.

The Reds have moved Kerevi, who played every game at 13 on the Wallabies’ end of year tour, towards 12 this year in Super Rugby, utilising his strengths as a carrier but protecting his weaknesses as a defender. Kerevi has been one of the best players in Super Rugby, flourishing in a more suited role.

The Crusaders perhaps have two of the world’s best who can play outside centres in their midfield. Crotty over the last two years has played a lot of 13 for the All Blacks but 12 with his Super Rugby team, allowing Goodhue to develop to the point where he has now the All Blacks main option. As sharp as Crotty has been this season at 30-years-old, the younger Goodhue is still probably the better-suited 13 option due to youthful athleticism.

In the Pro 14 final this weekend, Leinster’s Garry Ringrose will suit up at outside centre. In the Premiership semi-finals, Henry Slade will line up for Exeter while European champions Saracens also use the versatile Alex Lozowski who is in the same mould. The Crusaders’ are hot favourites to take home a third consecutive title, with Crotty and Goodhue.

All the world’s best clubs have them, but they are perhaps the rarest breed to find and develop, making the modern-day midfielder an important commodity and changing the dynamics of the position.

Was Glen Jackson hungover while referring the Chiefs vs Blues?:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Why World Cup winner doesn’t blame All Black for leaving New Zealand Why World Cup winner doesn’t blame All Black for leaving New Zealand
Search