Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Nations Championship is a novel idea but won't fix the real problem

Photo Credit: ©INPHO/James Crombie

What happens when we get bored of playing England and France all the time?

ADVERTISEMENT

What happens when the novelty of the Nations Championship wears off?

What happens when it becomes clear the competition’s a closed shop and our Pacific neighbours fall further and further behind and more and more of their elite talent turns out for tier one nations instead?

I’m not against the Nations Championship concept. Not against the idea of the All Blacks playing Northern Hemisphere opponents in a meaningful context.

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 12

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 12

Games between Rugby World Cups have to be more than just revenue-generating exercises and, in time, the so-called Nations Championship might become a competition of consequence.

But let’s not overlook why countries such as New Zealand need it.

It’s because fans are bored.

The problem is, though, that they’re not bored because regular foes Australia and South Africa can’t cut it.

The Springboks are as formidable as ever and Australia are on the rise, so it’s not as if familiarity has bred contempt.

ADVERTISEMENT

No, the fundamental flaw in all this is that fans are actually bored of rugby.

We can play whoever we like and, for a short period at least, playing new teams might help renew interest. But it won’t alter the fact that the game itself has become a bore.

As I say, I’ve nothing against the idea of a Nations Championship. I just have concerns about where we turn when that no longer excites fans either.

The folk at Fifa, for instance, have mooted the idea of a football World Cup every other year. Why wait four, when you can cash in every couple?

But then what? Annual World Cups?

ADVERTISEMENT

Now that’s just an issue of greed. Whatever football’s flaws might be, waning fan enthusiasm is not among them.

The game is brilliantly played and supporters, in the big football nations, can’t get enough of it.

Sadly, folk here in New Zealand appear to have had their fill of rugby.

The professional game is utterly unwatchable live.

Where replays and talking heads help make the television experience tolerable, you simply cannot stay engaged and connected to games in person.

Almost every burst of play is followed by a break for water. Then a couple of scrums go down or a Television Match Official wants to have a look at something and, before you know it, five minutes have gone by without the ball being in play.

You can’t take a child to that; they simply don’t have the attention span.

Plus, thanks to inventions such as PlayStation, they’re used to seeing all the stars in action. Try explaining to a 10-year-old that in real life players have rest weeks and sabbaticals.

With no atmosphere in grounds, they pound you with music to the point where you can barely talk to the person next to you. By the time you’ve been to the loo or bought another beer, to stay occupied during the breaks in play, you feel like watching the second half in the pub.

That’s if you can be bothered to go to a game in the first place.

We have to be honest here and accept that the product isn’t actually good enough. If it was, people would watch it.

How often does a whistle blow during a match? Sixty times? A hundred?

And if you’re at a game in person, it’s impossible to know why. All you see is a pile of bodies, 50 metres away.

The game is mystifying and pedantic and pedestrian right now and until the ball’s in play more often and the laws are more easily understood, it’s going to continue struggling to attract an audience.

The powers that be waste so much time on things that have nothing to do with rugby.

Commercial and broadcast deals, social-justice gestures, format changes, media training, anthem singers, halftime entertainment, mascots, marketing, craft beer and healthy eating options. Could we just concentrate on improving the footy?

I wish the proposed Nations Championship all the best. I hope it’s a roaring success and attracts legions of fans everywhere.

I just worry it’ll be let down by the game itself.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
i
isaac 955 days ago

Rugby matches now days have become more about referees and less about excitement...every second pass of the ball and the ref arms vosa up for advantage. Everytime there's a water break, world rugby makes a new rule, every halftime new tournament pops up, every full time is just a review of how poor the match officials were....watching NRL on the other hand has a far more ball on play minutes and there is real oomph for speed and fan engagement

A
Andrew 955 days ago

Utterly done with the TMO thing. Accept occasional mistakes and move on. Most gamesnow I'm screaming silently with frustration at the endless stoppages for the ref to make that damn square sign signalling a decision to come in 5 min time. Just get on with the game.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search