Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Nigel Owens verdict on 'always illegal' Sam Prendergast yellow

Ireland's Sam Prendergast looks on from the sin bin last Saturday (Photo by Ben McShane/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Retired Test referee Nigel Owens has delivered his verdict on the much-debated yellow card brandished last Saturday to Ireland’s Sam Prendergast. The 21-year-old was sin-binned by referee Hollie Davidson just eight minutes into his first international start for his shoulder-to-head contact with Fiji’s Kitione Salawa.

ADVERTISEMENT

The incident was the reviewed in the foul play bunker and the decision was taken that the punishment should remain at a yellow card. This outcome infuriated Fiji coach Mick Byrne, who believed that Prendergast, who came back on to help Ireland to their 52-17 win, should have seen red.

Reviewing the collision on the latest edition of Whistle Watch, Owens explained why the decision was reached to leave the sanction at a yellow card, claiming there was a low degree of danger in the head contact which mitigated the punishment down from a straight red card.

Video Spacer

Boks Office – Looking ahead to 2025 | RPTV

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 3:48
Loaded: 4.38%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 3:48
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Boks Office – Looking ahead to 2025 | RPTV

    The Boks Office crew look ahead to what’s next for the Springboks in 2025. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV now

    Watch now

    However, he acknowledged why there was much debate that the ‘tackle’ wasn’t judged to be a 20-minute red card, which would have meant Prendergast would have been unable to return to the field of play but Ireland would have eventually been able to replace him and restore the match to a 15-versus-15 contest.

    “A lot of you have been talking about the Prendergast shoulder-to-head tackle,” began Owens on the World Rugby video series. “Do we have direct contact with the head? Yes, we certainly do, so we have foul play. What we also have here as well is an illegal action and this is probably now what has caused a lot of the debate between whether it should be a red or should be a yellow.

    Fixture
    Internationals
    Ireland
    52 - 17
    Full-time
    Fiji
    All Stats and Data

    “Because the actions are always illegal, so he goes in with a shoulder tucked in, there is no legal time to wrap so mitigation does not play a part, so the question all of you are asking now is does this reach the yellow card threshold? Yes, it certainly does and it goes to the bunker.

    “But the big question is, why was it not a red card? So can you have a yellow card even though it’s foul play, there is no mitigation because the action is always illegal? Well, the answer is yes you can. It all comes down on the day to whether officials feel that the actual contact with the head was a high degree of danger. So if it’s a high degree of danger there is no debate whatsoever, it will be a red card.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “But because the officials felt that even though it was always illegal and there is contact with the head, they didn’t feel it was a high degree of danger and therefore that is how it remained at a yellow card. But it all comes down to do you think that the high degree of danger was enough to warrant a 20-minute red card?

    “Hmmm, well a lot of you think it is and you are not wrong although others of you think it’s a low degree of danger and therefore, like the officials on the day, it remained at the yellow card.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

    Argentina vs Australia | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

    Saitama Wildknights vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

    The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

    The gruelling reality behind one of the fastest sports in the world | The Report

    Boks Office | Episode 40 | The Steven Kitshoff Special

    Perry Baker in the house | HSBC Life on Tour | Los Angeles

    Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    7 Comments
    E
    Ed the Duck 167 days ago

    Inconsistency is the issue that plagues world rugby. Compare the Prendergast decision with Scott Cummings recent 20 min red vs SA. SC was deflected in his clear out by a Bok player standing up on the wrong side as Cummings came over the top of him mid clear out. As a result of the deflection Cummings fell off the side of the player he was clearing out and landed on that players lower leg. It wasn’t a serious injury so there was evidently no high degree of danger, similar to prendergast’s contact to the Fiji players head. If anything prendergasts’ action was worse since it was never legal but Cummings started his clear out legally and only moved to illegal inadvertently as a result of an opposition players illegal actions.


    How difficult can it be to have some measure in consistent application of the laws…???

    t
    tt 167 days ago

    The difference should be about intent. Prendergast always intended to shoulder charge and opponents head. Even if it was just a glancing blow it was done to deliberately harm the player. Cummings was accidental but still foul play because he still managed a croc roll. The latter is a yellow but regardless of degree of danger the former should have been a red, if not a full red.

    B
    Bull Shark 167 days ago

    Nigel fails to mention that, in addition to whether the act had a high degree of danger of injury to the Fijian player - which it was correctly deemed not to - upgrading to a red would present a high degree of danger to the Irish team’s overall performance.


    So it wasn’t upgraded to red.

    t
    tt 167 days ago

    Disagree. The safety of the Irish team must be a consideration for the player who committed foul play.

    T
    TM 167 days ago

    The real problem is, Radradra getting his yellow card upgraded to red while Prendergast stayed at yellow, this is the TMO responsibility. Fiji would have felt very unfairly treated. I thought the referee (Holly Davidson I believe), seemed to favour Ireland on any 50-50 calls in the first half, especially when penalizing Fiji at a scrum, when they were moving forward. It felt like someone had a word at half time, because for the first 15 minutes of the second half, she seemed to favour Fiji with the 50-50 decisions, including a scrum penalty that should have gone to Ireland, until reverting back to Ireland for the final 25 minutes.

    J
    Jon 168 days ago

    Nigel didn't say what he thought. Was it a high degree of danger or not? Red or Yellow???

    Load More Comments

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    S
    Solenn Bonnet 3 days ago
    Leinster cleanse palette with record URC scoreline against Zebre

    My name is Solenn Bonnet, and I am a single mother navigating the challenges of raising my two-year-old child while trying to make ends meet. I came across a trading platform that promised astonishing daily profits of 18%. The allure of such a high return on investment was too tempting to resist, and I found myself drawn into cryptocurrency trading. Excited by the prospect of financial freedom, I invested a significant amount of my savings, totaling over 5.7 BTC. However, what started as a hopeful venture quickly turned into a nightmare. The platform was a scam, and I lost everything I had invested. The emotional toll of this loss was immense; I felt devastated and helpless, struggling to provide for my child and keep up with my bills. In my desperate attempt to recover my funds, I sought help from various recovery experts. Unfortunately, I encountered numerous fraudulent individuals who claimed they could help me retrieve my lost money. Each time I reached out, I was met with disappointment and further scams, which only deepened my despair. Last year was one of the most challenging periods of my life, filled with anxiety and uncertainty about my financial future. Feeling overwhelmed and at a loss, I confided in a close friend from church about my situation. She listened compassionately and shared her own experiences with financial difficulties. Understanding my plight, she introduced me to Tech Cyber Force Recovery, a group of skilled hackers known for their expertise in recovering lost funds. Skeptical yet hopeful, I decided to reach out to them as a last resort. Their services came at a higher cost, but my friend generously offered to help me with a partial payment. I was amazed by how quickly they responded and began the recovery process. Their team was professional, efficient, and incredibly supportive throughout the entire ordeal. To my relief, they successfully recovered more than I had lost to those heartless scammers. This was truly transformative, and I felt a sense of relief and gratitude that I hadn’t felt in a long time. I strongly encourage anyone who has faced similar challenges or fallen victim to scams to reach out to Tech Cyber Force Recovery. If you’ve invested in a fraudulent platform like I did, they are highly capable of helping you reclaim your hard-earned money. Don’t lose hope; there is a way to recover what you’ve lost.

    CONSULT TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY

    EMAIL.. support@techyforcecyberretrieval.com

    WhatsApp.. +15617263697

    website.. https://techyforcecyberretrieval.com

    Telegram.. +15617263697

    0 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING Where are they now? Danny Care's Harlequins team in first start for club Where are they now? Danny Care's Harlequins team in debut game for clu
    Search