Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Nigel Owens verdict on the du Toit 'dangerous play' red card

(Photo by Sydney Seshibedi/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Nigel Owens has given his verdict on the red card that resulted in Springboks back-rower Pieter-Steph du Toit getting banned for three matches following his red-carded eleventh-minute breakdown collision last Saturday with France’s Jonathan Danty.

ADVERTISEMENT

The French midfielder was struck by du Toit in Marseille, an action that Owens described as dangerous play. However, his review of the clash in the latest episode of his Whistle Watch programme also posed an interesting question – might Springboks teammate Jasper Wiese, who pushed du Toit forward into the ruck, have been red-carded if the incident was viewed differently by referee Wayne Barnes?

On the replay showing the build-up to the collision near the French ten-metre line, Springboks No8 Wiese is seen placing his hands on the buttocks of the stooped du Toit and propelling him forward into the breakdown.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

“Let’s make one thing clear, this is dangerous play,” began Owens when reviewing the footage of du Toit clattering into Danty. “When you look at the actual incident itself, the head contact, it is dangerous play, it is a red card.

“There is no doubt about that but the interesting thing is this, if you look just before the contact there is a push by a fellow South African player into du Toit which causes him then to maybe land up with this action, so the interesting thing here is who gets the red card?

Related

“Does du Toit get it? Does the player who pushed him get it? That basically comes down to your interpretation on the day as the referee. So, to wrap it all up for you, it is a red card. If you feel that du Toit goes in the position, nothing he could do about it, it’s a red card to du Toit. If you felt that the push caused it then you would be quite right in giving a red card to the player [Wiese] who pushed him. So there you go, dangerous play, red card.”

At his disciplinary hearing, du Toit denied that he had committed an act of foul play worthy of a red card. However, the judicial committee determined otherwise, finding the play by the Springboks forward to be reckless.

ADVERTISEMENT

They added: “Although there were some external factors identified with respect to the incident, they were not, on the evidence before the judicial committee, of a sufficient degree to justify a reclassification of the offending to below red card.”

The heading resulted in a suspension entry point of six weeks that was reduced to three, leaving du Toit suspended for this Saturday’s match versus Italy, the November 26 game against England and one other yet-to-be-confirmed fixture.

That unconfirmed third match of the ban can be scratched, though, if du Toit applies to take part in the coaching intervention programme, which is essentially World Rugby’s tackle school.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
m
martin 853 days ago

Im quite sure it was kwagga smith that gave the push

j
john 853 days ago

Rugby in general is becoming a joke!!

F
Frankie 853 days ago

What are you talking about?
There was no push from number 8, but there was definitely a push from 12...which would be a strange jersey for Jasper Wiese to wear even if he was on the field, which he wasn't. Please hire a journalist who watches rugby next time Rugbypass.

G
Godfrey 853 days ago

No guys you are being harsh on Nigel. He was a great referee and although might have got the guy who does the pushing wrong, he has a point. By the way the SA commentators thought it was Damian de Allende who did the pushing and the number 12 can be seen on the back of the player going down next to PSDT.

L
Lawrence 854 days ago

Haha Jasper Wiese didn't even play. Wow this journalism should really be better - its a rugby site
. Kwagga Smith was 8thman.

J
Jan-Charl 854 days ago

Nigel Owens has become world rugbys lapdog. He is being appointed head of the new referee evaluation board while the problem is not the referees but the absolute lack of accountability from world rugby makes rugby a laughing stock. #boycottrugbyworldcup

R
Robert 854 days ago

Pretty harsh on Wiese considering he wasn’t even in the match day 23.

L
Luc 854 days ago

Sorry Nigel, but if you look closely to the images (what I have done) you can see clearly that Wiese has no impact on Du Toit move.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'France may leave top players at home but will still be serious contenders in New Zealand'

You can translate here https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&op=websites


Thanks for the link, but I can read it clearly and it says the… Top 14 features almost twice as many matches as Super Rugby Pacific, but is two and a half times longer.


This article appears to be the basis of; https://www.rugbypass.com/plus/the-stats-show-the-club-v-country-wounds-may-never-heal/ which is the one that I referred to which refutes your perception.


Were they both say..

If we take the dominant clubs in each major championship, we see that Stade Toulousain, author of the Top 14 – Champions Cup double, only has seven players above 1000 minutes, far from the average previously cited.


Furthermore, none of these players are full-time starters for the French national team: Toulouse are ahead of the competition at this level, and are far more effective than their domestic rivals in protecting their premium players.

The premium players being treated best is clearly apparent. Is you’re player management as good as New Zealands, of course not. NZ players will obviously be more fresh, but if we take the total of each at the end of their seasons, theres not going to be much difference as I’ve said, LNR are already treating their players much better.


I’m sorry, but as I alluded to, you are a fan rather than a researcher, your picture that you think has been painted is wrong. Your linked article says everything I did above.


So while that article paints the French in a well rested light, however it’s not actually including EPCR, which in respect to Toulouse, is where they’ve put their stars minutes into. So I think it’s time to do your own research! Pick and player and lets see, one of each camp? An important player you think has played a lot, and an example of a fresh young lad. Then were can look to their minutes as see how close or far they are to examples of players who are going to play in July.


Trust me, I have already done this research (but wouldn’t mind look at examples from this year to see if it’s still the case/same as previous years).

40 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Steve Meehan: 'If you start winning, it’s amazing what effect it has on all fans.' Steve Meehan: 'If you start winning, it’s amazing what effect it has on all fans.'
Search