Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The All Blacks Are Poised To Break Another Record, But Does Anyone Really Want Them To?

Kieran Read wins again (Photo Getty Images)

The All Blacks are again on the verge of breaking rugby’s record for most consecutive test wins. Deservedly so, writes Jamie Wall, but it would still be a shame to see the ’65-’69 All Blacks knocked out of the history books.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s that time again. For the past five years, the All Blacks have fashioned the most consistent era in professional rugby, winning 56 out of 61 games. They’ve won the World Cup, Rugby Championship, Bledisloe and any other bit of silverware going. But there’s one thing that’s eluded them, and it’s not a trophy.

The record for consecutive test wins currently stands at 17. It’s jointly held by the 1965-69 All Blacks, 1997-98 Springboks and 2013-14 All Blacks*.

In all, the All Blacks occupy six of the top 10 spots in the winning streak list. But how do the All Blacks of today stack up against the ones whose record they are on the verge of breaking? Specifically, the players who are old enough to be their grandfathers.

The late ’60s All Black side that currently shares the record has a list of names that reads like rugby royalty: Gray, Going, McCormick, Tremain, Kirkpatrick, Nathan, Lochore, and perhaps the greatest of all: Meads.

They forged their record over five big seasons. They played 18 matches in 1967 alone, and they would have played more had it not been for a Foot & Mouth Disease outbreak in the UK that meant they couldn’t travel to Ireland. Their test streak included every major rugby playing nation bar Ireland.

The current All Blacks win streak is up to 15, a run of results which has been achieved in little over a year. In that time they’ve won a World Cup and beaten all the top sides in the world (except Ireland, who have once again escaped their wrath). They’ve been stacked full of legendary players too: Carter, Nonu, Smith, Woodcock, Mealamu and, of course, McCaw.

ADVERTISEMENT

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473306980″]

2016 was supposed to be a rebuilding year after the retirement of the aforementioned legends, but it’s simply turned into a case study of how brilliantly the New Zealand rugby system has future-proofed the national side. At this point it seems less a matter of if they break the record, but how impossible they’re going to make the new record for any team that tries to beat it.

But the All Blacks have been here before – and recently. They’ve stood at the door of greatness in 2012 and 2014, only to have it slammed in their face first by England and then by Australia. Both those results came completely out of the blue, and in both cases normal transmission resumed straight away afterwards. In fact, the follow-up test against the Wallabies yielded a record scoreline.

If the All Blacks are to break the record this time it will happen at Eden Park against the Wallabies on October 22nd. Before then, the All Blacks are away to Los Pumas and the Springboks, neither of whom have given the All Blacks any trouble this year.

In the unlikely event of an upset, there will be one consolation. There’s something quite nice about having a record that harks back to a different era altogether – one with long sleeved jerseys without corporate logos on them, with proper fighting instead of grabbing collars, and mythological tales of preseason training by running up hills with a sheep under each arm.

ADVERTISEMENT

For the current All Blacks, it might just be the only time they can lose and not get completely wrecked by the famously indignant New Zealand public.

* Though, technically, Cyprus and Lithuania both have longer win streaks…

ADVERTISEMENT

Kubota Spears vs Saitama Wild Knights | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The gruelling reality behind one of the fastest sports in the world | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 40 | The Steven Kitshoff Special

Perry Baker in the house | HSBC Life on Tour | Los Angeles

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 6 | Le Crunch

The Unexpected Journey to USA 7s Glory | Aaron Cummings | Sevens Wonders

USA vs Japan | Full Match Replay

Yokohama Canon Eagles vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
BigGabe 14 minutes ago
'Love him or hate him, Henry Pollock has got the rugby world talking.'

Well, I would disagree with your take that you don’t take the p*** out of the opposition.


Sledging and posturing is very much a part of the game - “four more years”/"just a **** richie mccaw”/any swan dive celebration/English yelling when they win minor penalties/etc etc. Cricket has much the same when a wicket keeper chats in a batsman’s ears, but no one complains about it. Just because we can’t hear what goes on a ruck or maul, or see what goes on, doesn’t mean it doesn’t go on. Sport is emotional. Let’s not pretend that rugby has a history of behaving like absolute gentleman before the final whistle goes off.


The spirit of rugby…now this is an interesting one. What does that mean? 2-3 years ago, the 6-2/7-1 split was against the spirit of rugby, but now it is used by club and country. Does this mean the spirit of rugby can change? In 1974, the Lions had an infamous Call 99. Today, teams are still getting into fights. Other sports don’t do this. Is this the spirit of rugby? I think this phrase is one of those useful ones that means everything and nothing and can be used by both sides of the fence, as well as the fence itself, to justify what they want to see. But perhaps we should not be looking at Pollock, but at ourselves. Are we (you) all not giving a self-described wind up merchant exactly what he wants? I think this conservative group of sports fans needs to realise that just bc they have viewed rugby a certain way for a long time, does not mean that it necessarily needs to be viewed that way for ever and ever amen. That’s gatekeeping and the generations to come don’t like or respect it. As rugby culture breaks into new markets, it needs to constantly adjust.

9 Go to comments
N
Nickers 1 hour ago
USA team in Super Rugby Pacific is not the answer right now, but this is

The question for any expansion is - what is the point?


On one hand talking about expanding for commercial reasons, but then saying younger squad members would play giving big names a rest making it more for development purposes?


The problem with SRP is it serves two masters - fans who want a good competition to watch, but also the national teams in developing players so they can go on to become international players.


The case for maximising young player development:


A major problem NZ and Australia have is at U20s. AR and NZR would be best served by investing in proper U20 super rugby competition that runs in conjunction with Super Rugby, rather than the one-off carnival style thing that happens at the moment. 20 year olds coming out of France and England in particular, but also France are noticeably more developed than the equivalent players from NZ, Australia and even SA.


NZ and Australia probably both have one too many teams in SR. If you’re taking a long term view they are best served by cutting teams from the comp now and improving the quality even more. Although MP have been good this year there is also an argument for cutting them too, and reducing to 8 teams that all play each other home and away in a round robin. It would be a ridiculously strong competition with a lot of depth if all the best players are redistributed.


This in conjunction with a full U20s competition (possibly playing just one round rather than 2) would make NZ and Australia international teams much stronger with a lot more depth.


But that solution would make less money and cost more.


NPC would need to be fully amateur or semi-pro at best in this model. If you cross reference the losses NZR posted today with the costs they have previously published about operating the NPC, you can attribute a huge amount, if not all of the losses, to the NPC. At the moment this is putting way too much money into a failing high performance competition at the expense of development.

12 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘Rising force’ Proctor gives All Blacks Ioane dilemma ‘Rising force’ Proctor gives All Blacks Ioane dilemma
Search