Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The one thing that didn’t surprise Eben Etzebeth about Scotland

By Grant Constable reporting from Edinburgh
A general view as tempers flare between players of Scotland and South Africa during the Autumn Nations Series 2024 match between Scotland and South Africa at the Scottish Gas Murrayfield on November 10, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

While the final scoreline gives the impression of a fairly comfortable outing for South Africa in their opening Autumn Nations Series match, it was anything but as Scotland gave as good as they got at Scottish Gas Murrayfield.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks’ 7-1 bench aimed to effectively blast the Scots off the park in the second half, but it wasn’t quite that straightforward as the home outfit stood up to the giant units that are now holders of both the Rugby World Cup and the Rugby Championship.

A 32-15 victory will look impressive in the history books, but this was a contest that felt a lot closer. And there was plenty of feeling.

“I think I said in the press conference before the game yesterday that we know they are a quality side,” commented stand-in Springbok captain Eben Etzebeth, who himself felt the full force of Scotland’s physical effort.

“Always, when you prepare for Scotland, we prepare like we are going to play New Zealand or Ireland, because they’re one of the top teams in the world.

“To beat them at Murrayfield with 17 points, yeah, maybe the scoreboard does flatter us a little bit, but we still got a good performance in.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We always know it’s not going to go our way. It’s going to be a bit of a grind. They’re a quality side, and they definitely stood up to us in the general play with their physicality and brought the game to us as well, so it was a good battle. It was a good Test match.

“Compliments to them. I think they were great today. We probably weren’t at our best, but we showed quality in the end to make the scoreboard like that.”

Defence

146
Tackles Made
125
17
Tackles Missed
26
90%
Tackle Completion %
83%

South Africa kept Scotland try-less for the second time in succession, a fact that coach Rassie Erasmus noted was even more impressive considering they have the likes of Finn Russell in their ranks.

The Springboks now move back to number one in the world rankings, with Ireland dropping to third and New Zealand up to second.

ADVERTISEMENT

Facing England next, Etzebeth knows full well that they need to keep getting better.

“We obviously set our standards for ourselves. We drive within the team, the players and the management. We want to keep on, keep on performing.

“And we know every now and then there’s going to be a performance that we’re not probably that proud of, and like I said, at the end of the day it was a good performance because we beat them by that margin.

“But there’s just some aspects of the game that we probably won’t be happy with and that we’ll work on and I’m sure the coaches will point it out to us, and there will be some harsh words, but also some good words. And then I think that you need that in a professional team environment.

“We always strive to be better, and that’s why I say there will be some harsh words as well.”

Watch the highly acclaimed five-part documentary Chasing the Sun 2, chronicling the journey of the Springboks as they strive to successfully defend the Rugby World Cup, free on RugbyPass TV (*unavailable in Africa)

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
N
NR 40 days ago

It looked like the Boks didnt show up. Just going through the motions and drills. Almost robotic. The score line is definitely not a true reflection of the game. Scotland were unlucky. Im sure the Boks will be much improved against "Plastic Energy" England.

B
Bull Shark 40 days ago

I think the boks were made to work hard for the win. Which says a lot about Scotland who weren't unlucky insofar as they couldn't score tries against the Boks formidable defence. Scotland were very good around the breakdowns. All credit to them, they definitely deserve to be higher up in the rankings.


I said from the outset that Scotland would be the toughest match on this tour. And they delivered.


England, not to be too dismissive of them, are less of a threat than Scotland imo. But they are wounded and angry and can produce a win. But they're not playing to any clear plan on defense or attack - due to their coaches not having a clue.


The Boks formation is leaving them vulnerable at the breakdowns. The backline, in particular, need to clear out more and more rucks as we play across the width of the field with this 12221 (or whatever they're calling it) formation.


So I think it was quite carefully planned out that two packs of forwards (i.e. the 7/1) were played against Scotland to get match fitness and our preferred backline in Manie, DDA, Kriel, KLA, Cheslin and Fassi were rested for England.


I think England are going to have their hands full on Saturday.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search