Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'outdated' notion an England rugby columnist wants to bin

(Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Names of the back of rugby shirts will be a talking point this weekend following the recent headlines generated by England confirming they will put them on their jerseys for the Autumn Nations Series, starting on Sunday versus Argentina at Twickenham. However, one advocate of the names on rugby shirts campaign wants club teams in England to take this initiative a step further and allocate squad numbers to players for the duration of an entire season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former Newcastle newspaper writer Mark Smith now works as the media manager for the Gallagher Premiership Falcons and his latest match programme column for Saturday’s Kingston Park home game versus Bath has debated the idea that names on squad numbered shirts would be a long-term positive for the sport in England and beyond.

Smith first raised the idea on social media but his suggestion was generally rubbished by rugby fans. However, he has now revisited the topic and made an impassioned plea for rugby minds to become more open to the idea of change to help grow a sport in England that is struggling to regain ground lost due to the pandemic stoppage.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“Rugby needs to start thinking differently to attract and retain new supporters, but my recent suggestion regarding shirt numbers took a right old battering when I aired it on Twitter,” began Smith in the neatly produced digital match programme that can be accessed by clicking here.

“The catalyst was the fact international rugby is finally catching up to the club game by having names on the back of the players’ shirts during the autumn internationals – hardly revolutionary, but welcome nonetheless. My idea was that Premiership clubs move to squad numbers rather than the traditional one to 15, so each player at the start of each season gets their own squad number, unique to them, with their name and number on display for each game.

“Currently, the clubs have players numbered one to 15 with names, which to seasoned rugby watchers seems to be the ideal scenario. On a practical level, this means clubs have to name and number hundreds of additional shirts each season to fit every conceivable selection possibility, incurring a financial hit at a time when the sport hardly needs it.

“For a Ben Stevenson or a Sean Robinson this can mean playing in three or four different numbers, home and away, so you are up to six or eight shirts for one player before you even start accounting for spares. The finance is a side issue for me because the real benefit comes from the marketing and branding opportunities offered up by each player having their own unique number.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If I see a Newcastle Falcons No15 shirt, am I thinking of Elliott Obatoyinbo, Tom Penny, Alex Tait, Iwan Stephens, Louie Johnson, Josh Thomas or Nathan Earle? It’s currently a lottery, and there is no immediate association between the shirt number and the player wearing it.

“‘Oh, I really liked that Falcons No.15 last week’. ‘Ah, actually last week’s 15 is wearing ten today, and last week’s ten is wearing twelve today, and last week’s twelve is in 13, and eleven and 14 have swapped shirts too’. At a time when we need to be attracting new supporters, it just feels like an unnecessary barrier.

“The main argument on Twitter was that people want to know what position someone is playing in but in this ultra-professional era, the issue of set roles is somewhat of a misnomer other than at the set-piece. Even then, you will get No8s packing down at blindside flanker and fly-halves defending on the wing at a scrum, while the lineout often sees wingers at the front and flankers at half-back.

“In general play, you get props jackalling, wingers in at scrum-half, fly-halves standing at full-back and hookers putting in a cheeky grubber, and are we really asking rugby newbies to learn all 15 positional roles by heart before they can feel part of it? It’s time to let go of this outdated notion that the number on your back dictates the limitations of your role, and if existing rugby supporters are the only people upset by the change, then that’s fine.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s the new guys that we need to draw in, and if that means simplifying things by allowing Ben Stevenson to wear a No45 shirt for the entire season, then so be it. Let’s have a ‘Stevo45’ range in the club shop, change his Instagram handle to @stevo45, and get it on his boots.

“On its own, I’m not pretending it’s the answer to rugby’s problems, but at a point when we need new eyeballs on the sport we need to be more open in our thinking.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 24 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search