Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Owen Farrell verdict on his kicking display versus Wales

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

England skipper Owen Farrell has given his verdict on the standard of his kicking in his team’s Guinness Six Nations win over Wales, a victory that was left hanging in the balance until five minutes from time when Ollie Lawrence grabbed the third try of their 20-10 success.

ADVERTISEMENT

Out-half Farrell had his difficulties with the boot throughout, getting charged down early on, kicking out on the full later in the opening half and eventually finishing up with a frustrating accuracy rate off the kicking tee as he only landed two of his six attempts, scoring five points but leaving another 10 behind him on the field.

It annoyed him that his inaccuracy left his team vulnerable, all their hard work going unrewarded as it wasn’t until very late that they finally could take a breath knowing they were two scores in front and set to take the victory.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I didn’t kick well, no. That was obvious,” admitted Farrell in the aftermath of what was a win for head coach Steve Borthwick in his first away match in charge. “They weren’t coming off the way I’d like them to but I have been here before, I’ll get out to work again.

“The only thing with that is the team probably deserved to be further ahead and the team worked hard to be further ahead. The fight that they showed to stick at it, especially away from home and in that last 20 minutes to take control of the game like they did, I thought was fantastic. Yeah, I’ll get back to work.”

Related

The victory was the second England win this month, this latest success over Wales adding to the bounceback that began versus Italy following the round one loss to Scotland. What did Farrell generally make of the triumph that keeps them in the title hunt heading into their round four match at home to France on March 11?

“I’m pleased with the performance as a whole. We want to keep stepping forward and that, for the reasons we have just spoken about, was a real step forward. Now we have got a week’s training to get after it and learn quickly again and prepare for a massive Test in two weeks.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We feel like we are getting better. There are bits of it [the new way under Borthwick] poking through now and, as we have said, the more time we spend together the quicker we want to learn and the more we want to push on.

“With this being the start of our journey we have to make sure we are laying the foundations and we feel like we are doing that but, at the same time, we have got to make sure we are having little conversations and trying to get on the same page to fill the gaps as players. You see little bits of personality coming out and combinations starting to come together within that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search