Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The panic button the EPCR may well end up pushing - Andy Goode

Stuart Hogg /PA

We all knew Covid disruption was likely again in the Champions Cup this season and it’s anyone’s guess when these latest postponed games can be replayed but common sense has to prevail.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last season’s pool stages were called off early and the same could happen this time around but that is a complicated decision and a route that the organisers obviously only want to go down as a last resort.

The number of cases in the UK associated with the new Omicron variant only started increasing significantly in the last few days and the French government have only just decided to impose travel restrictions from midnight on Saturday, so EPCR were no doubt hoping to get through this weekend and reassess.

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

That hasn’t happened and there are only a limited number of weekends available to the Champions Cup organisers and no more room in a packed rugby calendar, so I’ve no idea when they are planning to reschedule these Round 2 games.

champions cup postponements
EPCR Champions Cup flag (Getty Images)

The possibility of taking a break for a couple of weeks to see how things pan out, a sort of circuit-breaker as it has been called, will be being discussed by Premiership Rugby as it is in football and other sports but this is all too new for that to have been an option for EPCR.

I know there have been a number of positive tests in the Ospreys camp but the news that their game at Racing 92 was being cancelled, with five points being awarded to the Top 14 side, came just a couple of hours before it was announced that games between French and UK teams were being rescheduled so they might be asking whether that one can now be replayed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leinster were also up in arms about the fact that they were getting nothing and the full five points were being awarded to Montpellier so, even though their situation is different as games between Irish and French sides are still going ahead as things stand, they’re likely to be investigating whether this could change things for them.

They had a number of positive Covid cases in their ranks, though, and Montpellier boss Philippe Saint-Andre questioned whether the front row options available to them were up to scratch as well so I’m not sure it will change for them.

You can understand Leinster being frustrated to a certain extent as they have a massive squad of players at their disposal and feel the game could have gone ahead but player safety has to be paramount and I think their response to the cancellation was disappointing.

I think the statement they put out overstepped the mark and it does get to the stage where playing a game of rugby probably isn’t the right thing to do, aside from the fact that it really isn’t that important in the grand scheme of things.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s not forget as well that Leinster’s Round of 16 tie against Toulon in April was called off at the last minute and they got a bye straight through to the quarter-finals, where they were fresh after a week off and beat Exeter at Sandy Park.

These are tough times that we’re living in at the moment and sometimes things go for you and sometimes they go against you but no risks should be taken when it comes to looking after the health and well-being of the players and their families and friends.

As EPCR point out, this isn’t about apportioning blame but they do have to follow the procedures that have been put in place and agreed by all teams and that means Montpellier got the points in this instance.

When it comes to French teams not fulfilling fixtures against those from the UK because of the rules imposed by their government this weekend, initially I expected the opposition to be awarded the full five points and a 28-0 win but this is similar to what happened last season and a new solution must now be sought.

To be honest, I don’t see when these rescheduled Round 2 matches can be played and the next couple of rounds are only four and five weeks away respectively, so it’s hugely doubtful whether all the games in those rounds will be able to take place as well.

The organisers say “the intention is to reschedule” but that may well change in due course.

There’s a bit of water to go under the bridge yet but it does seem most likely that the pool stage will be curtailed again, perhaps with the weekend of April 8/9/10 utilised for some sort of qualifying round for a Round of 16 the following week as opposed to having the planned two-legged Round of 16 ties.

That is for EPCR to determine in the days and weeks to come but, for now, common sense has to prevail. It’s right to call matches off this weekend and the welfare of the players and their loved ones comes first.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search