Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The proposed URC rethink that should ease South African frustrations

The Sharks lost out last weekend at Leinster (Photo by Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

URC is set to return to a meritocracy-based system regarding qualification for the Heineken Champions Cup – while better travel arrangements are on the cards for South African sides as the competition looks to improve from the opening two seasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

CEO Martin Anayi explained there was a proposal, which needs unanimous approval from all 16 URC clubs, that the eight Champions Cup qualification spots should go back to a meritocracy system rather than the shield format that has been in operation in the first two years of the revamped tournament’s existence.

This season, the quarter-final Cell C Sharks missed out on Champions Cup qualifying even though they finished eighth because the competition structure meant that a Welsh team – Cardiff who finished in 10th place – had to be included as they won the Welsh shield awarded to the highest-finishing team from that country in the URC.

Video Spacer

Stormers captain Steven Kitshoff on Connacht’s threats

Video Spacer

Stormers captain Steven Kitshoff on Connacht’s threats

Now, if the clubs agree, a return to meritocracy-based Champions Cup qualification is on the cards. “That’s most likely,” admitted Anayi. “The way it works now is we take the four geographical shield winners and the next four highest placed sides in the league and we did that because we wanted a broad range of teams in the Champions Cup.

“We also said there is a quite vocal objection to that within some of our stakeholder groups who didn’t want that, but they said they would go with that for a two-year period and then we would review this summer.”

Anayi also added that the current format of the highest-ranked side hosting the URC final would continue and the ‘destination final’ idea won’t be rekindled. “We moved away from the ‘destination final’ when the South African teams came in, largely because obviously you could have two South African teams in a European ‘destination final’ and that might be tricky.

“In year one, we obviously had with Stormers versus Bulls, so we have moved away to a highest-ranked team route. That is why this weekend is really interesting because if Leinster win, they have got a final in the Aviva Stadium. If Munster win and Stormers win, then they are down in Cape Town. That is why we have gone that route and that is really, really tricky for us – but actually this year there is an extra gap of a week between the Champions Cup final in Dublin.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When it comes to the travel concerns that have dogged South African teams this season, there were plans to address this – including making the tours longer to ensure fewer flights over the course of the season.

Anayi, though, highlighted that since the plans for South Africa inclusion were drawn up, the price of an average flight ticket had gone up 35 per cent. The cost of the European teams travelling to South Africa is covered by the URC, while the South African Rugby Union covers the cost of their teams’ travel.

“That inflation has been quite difficult,” he explained about the behind-the-scenes logistics. “There is a hell of a lot more we need to do. It [the planned changes] will result in only two tours rather than three or four tours. To reduce flights, it would add another match to the tour. When it’s a four-match tour, teams can settle into a location and get integrated into their hotel.”

Charter flights were also an option, but Anayi said URC were “trying to make it more direct and at convenient times, while expanding the number of business class seats available. There is a very low number of business class seats available on those routes and there is an over-subscription.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The URC boss added that the likely start date of next season’s competition would be on the weekend of October 20-22, the same weekend as the Rugby World Cup semi-finals in France.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 59 minutes ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

That 2019 performance was literally the peak in attacking rugby under Eddie. If you thought that was underwhelming, the rest of it was garbage.


I totally get what you're saying and England don't need or have any God given right to the best coaches in the world... But I actually think the coaches we do have are quite poor and for the richest union in the world, that's not good enough. 


England are competitive for sure but with the talent pool up here and the funds available, we should be in the top 3. At the very least we should be winning six nations titles on a semi-regular basis. If Ireland can, England definitely should.


England's attack coach (Richard Wigglesworth) is Borthwick's mate from his playing days at Saracens, who he brought to Leicester with him when he became coach. Wigglesworth was a 9 who had no running or passing game, but was the best box kicker in the business. He has no credentials to be an attack coach and I've seen nothing to prove otherwise. Aside from Marcus Smith’s individual brilliance, our collective attack has looked very uninspiring.

 

England's defence coach (Joe El-Abd) is Borthwick's housemate from uni, who has never been employed as a defence coach before. He's doing the job part time while he's still the head coach of a team in the second division of French rugby who have an awful defensive record. England's defence has gone from being brutally efficient under Felix Jones to as leaky as a colander almost overnight.


If Borthwick brings in a new attack and defence coach then I'll absolutely get behind him but his current coaches seem to be the product of nepotism. He's brought in people he's comfortable with because he lacks confidence as an international head coach and they aren't good enough for international rugby.


England are competitive because they do some things really well, mostly they front up physically, make a lot of big hits, have a solid kicking game, a good lineout, good maul, Marcus Smith and some solid forwards. A lot of what we do well I would ascribe to Borthwick personally. I don't think he's a bad coach, I think he lacks imagination and is overly risk averse. He needs coaches who will bring a point of difference.


I guess my point is, yes England are competitive, but we’re not aiming for competitive and I honestly don't believe this coaching setup has what it takes to make us any better than competitive.


On the plus side it looks like we have an amazing crop of young players coming through. Some of them who won the u20 world cup played for England A against Australia A on the weekend and looked incredible... Check out the highlights on youtube.

12 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars' 'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'
Search