Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The proposed URC rethink that should ease South African frustrations

The Sharks lost out last weekend at Leinster (Photo by Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

URC is set to return to a meritocracy-based system regarding qualification for the Heineken Champions Cup – while better travel arrangements are on the cards for South African sides as the competition looks to improve from the opening two seasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

CEO Martin Anayi explained there was a proposal, which needs unanimous approval from all 16 URC clubs, that the eight Champions Cup qualification spots should go back to a meritocracy system rather than the shield format that has been in operation in the first two years of the revamped tournament’s existence.

This season, the quarter-final Cell C Sharks missed out on Champions Cup qualifying even though they finished eighth because the competition structure meant that a Welsh team – Cardiff who finished in 10th place – had to be included as they won the Welsh shield awarded to the highest-finishing team from that country in the URC.

Video Spacer

Stormers captain Steven Kitshoff on Connacht’s threats

Video Spacer

Stormers captain Steven Kitshoff on Connacht’s threats

Now, if the clubs agree, a return to meritocracy-based Champions Cup qualification is on the cards. “That’s most likely,” admitted Anayi. “The way it works now is we take the four geographical shield winners and the next four highest placed sides in the league and we did that because we wanted a broad range of teams in the Champions Cup.

“We also said there is a quite vocal objection to that within some of our stakeholder groups who didn’t want that, but they said they would go with that for a two-year period and then we would review this summer.”

Anayi also added that the current format of the highest-ranked side hosting the URC final would continue and the ‘destination final’ idea won’t be rekindled. “We moved away from the ‘destination final’ when the South African teams came in, largely because obviously you could have two South African teams in a European ‘destination final’ and that might be tricky.

“In year one, we obviously had with Stormers versus Bulls, so we have moved away to a highest-ranked team route. That is why this weekend is really interesting because if Leinster win, they have got a final in the Aviva Stadium. If Munster win and Stormers win, then they are down in Cape Town. That is why we have gone that route and that is really, really tricky for us – but actually this year there is an extra gap of a week between the Champions Cup final in Dublin.”

ADVERTISEMENT

When it comes to the travel concerns that have dogged South African teams this season, there were plans to address this – including making the tours longer to ensure fewer flights over the course of the season.

Anayi, though, highlighted that since the plans for South Africa inclusion were drawn up, the price of an average flight ticket had gone up 35 per cent. The cost of the European teams travelling to South Africa is covered by the URC, while the South African Rugby Union covers the cost of their teams’ travel.

“That inflation has been quite difficult,” he explained about the behind-the-scenes logistics. “There is a hell of a lot more we need to do. It [the planned changes] will result in only two tours rather than three or four tours. To reduce flights, it would add another match to the tour. When it’s a four-match tour, teams can settle into a location and get integrated into their hotel.”

Charter flights were also an option, but Anayi said URC were “trying to make it more direct and at convenient times, while expanding the number of business class seats available. There is a very low number of business class seats available on those routes and there is an over-subscription.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The URC boss added that the likely start date of next season’s competition would be on the weekend of October 20-22, the same weekend as the Rugby World Cup semi-finals in France.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search