Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The reaction to 'rangy' Ollie Chessum, the latest new England cap

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

There were just 15 minutes remaining at Stadio Olimpico last Sunday when Ollie Chessum entered the Guinness Six Nations arena to replace skipper Tom Curry and make his England debut at just the age of 21 – quite the achievement for someone who has played just 16 times (eight as a starter) in the Gallagher Premiership for Leicester.  

ADVERTISEMENT

It was December when Tigers boss Steve Borthwick explained what he especially liked about the emerging 6ft 7in, 118kg forward. “A fantastic character who has worked really hard at his game. It hasn’t been a straight path for him. He has gone a different way. Played at Nottingham the year before last and shone there as a young man and then he has come in and worked hard to improve himself physically. 

“His attitude to work has always been excellent but his desire and focus to improve have been really impressive and you saw that on the pitch… he has shown a huge amount of perseverance. You talk about grasping opportunities, he is one that every time you give him an opportunity he jumps at it.”

Video Spacer

Scotland’s search for a Slam, Sir Clives’s Rebuke & The Real Paddy Power | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 20

Video Spacer

Scotland’s search for a Slam, Sir Clives’s Rebuke & The Real Paddy Power | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 20

Eight weeks later it was the turn of England boss Eddie Jones to sing the praises of Chessum. On Friday, after naming the Test rookie as the No19 for the clash away to Italy, the head coach suggested by way of introduction: He is a workhorse. He is a traditional six-stroke-four hard worker, has good basics, likes doing the tough stuff.”

Forty-eight hours later, with Chessum now a capped international player with England following his cameo off the bench in Rome, Jones reckoned: “A lovely hard-working kid. We have been looking for that tall, rangy four who can play six or six who can play four in the mould of a Courtney Lawes. 

“He is not to that level now but we feel he can develop into that important player for us that can fill two sports. To come in and not look out of place, for a guy that I don’t know how many Premiership games he has started, I am sure it is under ten it is a fantastic achievement.”

Asked was there a preference for Chessum to become a six or a four in the long-term, Jones added: “It doesn’t matter, we want someone who can play four or six. Having said that, I thought Maro was absolutely outstanding at six. It really suited his game and him and Curry together were a good combination.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Leicester were understandably chuffed that Chessum had become the latest player from their club to become a capped England forward. Freddie Burns, their man of the match in last Friday’s derby win over Northampton, summed up the mood when appearing on the RugbyPass Fanzone show with Jim Hamilton following the weekend’s action in round two of the Six Nations.

“Ollie getting his first cap is amazing. Everyone at Leicester is buzzing for him because you know what it is like Jim, you played there. You played in the position back row, second row where you don’t get the limelight. It’s not about necessarily scoring tries or being the poster boy is it, you are doing the nitty-gritty stuff that goes unseen.

“Ollie for us this year has really surprised me along with a few of the other youngsters at Tigers. I know his mum. She is always at the games supporting. His younger brother is also at the club as well. Just for his whole family, I’m made up that he has got his England debut,” said Burns. 

Hamilton added: “First touch of the ball was a lineout steal, second touch of the ball was nearly a lineout steal. His agent is my agent so I texted him, he was out in Italy watching Ollie making his debut in Rome and I said he made a real big contribution and it was good to see a young lad from my home club Leicester come on and do really well.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about the worst teams not giving up because they are so far off the pace we get really bad scoreline when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together.


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Glasgow coach jumps to defence of McDowall who faces possible huge ban Glasgow coach jumps to defence of McDowall who faces possible huge ban
Search