Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The reason behind botched Barbarians announcement of Quade Cooper

Quade Cooper /Getty Images

Wallabies head coach Dave Rennie has offered some insight behind Quade Cooper’s denial that he will play for the Barbarians next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

The famous invitational club last week announced that Cooper, the 74-test star playmaker, was one of three players who would wear the black-and-white hoops against Samoa at Twickenham on November 27.

Cooper was named alongside Springboks props Steven Kitshoff and Frans Malherbe as three of the newest additions to the Barbarians squad, which will be coached by Rennie for their one-off fixture.

Video Spacer

The Season – Brisbane Boys College | Season 8 | Episode 8

Video Spacer

The Season – Brisbane Boys College | Season 8 | Episode 8

However, Cooper took to Twitter in the wake of the announcement to deny any involvement with the Barbarians as he said he remains contracted to his Japanese club, the Kintetsu Liners, and hadn’t agreed to play.

“At no stage have I agreed to play for the @Barbarian_FC in the upcoming game against Samoa. I’m contracted to the Kintetsu Liners,” the 33-year-old posted last Tuesday.

Speaking to media following the announcement of his end-of-year tour squad – which Cooper is part of – on Friday, Rennie addressed the confusion over the matter by saying the Barbarians had “jumped the gun” on their announcement.

“We’d spoken to Quade, but he’s got a club to go back to, too,” Rennie said.

“We’re obviously keen for him to tour and stay another week, but obviously that makes it a little more difficult. He was certainly interested but he hadn’t committed. All good, no damage done.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Cooper’s contractual status with the Kintetsu Liners is also causing headaches for Rennie as Wallabies boss as he remains uncertain whether the first-five will be available for Australia’s test against Japan in Oita next Saturday.

The match falls outside World Rugby’s designated November test window, meaning foreign clubs aren’t obligated to release their players for Wallabies duties.

It also means Rennie may be without Suntory Sungoliath pair Samu Kerevi and Sean McMahon for the Brave Blossoms clash, but he said he is in constant dialogue with the Japanese clubs about his players’ availability.

“The key thing around this is we’re trying to create a strong relationship with the Japanese clubs too, because while, from a Reg Nine point-of-view, we can grab them, they’re their primary employer at the moment,” Rennie said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“While they’ve been very supportive, they’ve also got their own programmes to focus on and they want to be successful as well and I guess they want their best players fit and available, so it’s important we establish a good relationship there.”

Rennie also doesn’t expect to obtain the services of recalled France-based forwards Will Skelton, Rory Arnold and Tolu Latu until after round 10 of the Top 14, which won’t be until after Australia’s test against Scotland in Edinburgh on November 7.

The Barbarians have already announced a number of key players for next month’s clash, including Wallabies trio Nic White, Len Ikitau and Pete Samu, Springboks duo Malcolm Marx and Duane Vermeulen, and Los Pumas loose forward Pablo Matera.

Their match against Samoa comes in spite of the fact that the Pacific Island nation cancelled its end-of-year tour – where they would have also faced Georgia, Uruguay and Spain – due to health concerns for local-based players regarding Covid-19.

Instead, Lakapi Samoa, the nation’s governing body, said it expects a “Manu Samoa selection” made up of European-based players and staff will play the Barbarians in a match that has already sold more than 30,000 tickets.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search