Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The reason why Hurricanes fans shouldn't panic after Cape Town capitulation

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Those many pundits who wrote off the Hurricanes prior to the season due to the exit of Beauden Barrett and the prolonged injury absence of Ardie Savea will see little reason to change their minds.

ADVERTISEMENT

This follows the Hurricanes’ 27-0 shellacking by the Stormers in Cape Town to kick off their campaign on the worst possible note. It’s true that the Canes were the lamest of the four New Zealand franchises on show by a long shot.

They dropped a ridiculous amount of ball and didn’t achieve any of their tactical goals, as new head coach Jason Holland admitted afterwards. The Stormers did not even have to be that good. They just tackled with gusto and pounced on the visitors’ many errors.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Yes, the Canes missed Barrett’s ball skills and pace, but the Blues miss him more and he hasn’t even laced a boot yet for them. No, the Canes most missed the go-forward that Savea provides because it was in the forwards where they really came a cropper, beaten up physically at the breakdown by a hungry Stormers pack that included Steven Kitshoff, Bongi Mbonambi, Frans Malherbe, World Rugby player of the year Pieter-Steph du Toit and Springboks skipper Siya Kolisi.

The harsh glare of the spotlight will inevitably fall on pivot Fletcher Smith, who started his fourth game, in his second season, for the Canes, out of a total of seven. He was never really able to assert himself in Barrett’s absences last season, scoring 14 points.

It is fair to say that Smith, like most of his teammates, did not have the most auspicious of outings at Newlands. He dropped an early high ball, threw an intercept pass to du Toit and generally could get little going in his 64 minutes before being subbed for Jackson Garden-Bachop. Neither he nor Jordie Barrett even got the chance to take a shot at goal.

But not so fast. There are extenuating circumstances. The Hurricanes had little decent possession with which to operate. Smith perhaps needed to adjust his alignment off both set and phase play. He still, on the evidence of two compelling Mitre 10 Cups campaigns with Waikato, has more breadth to his game than Garden-Bachop, who is a reliable goalkicker but a more limited footballer. James Marshall is a useful utility, not a front-line general.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith, in fact, should have been an All Black to Japan in 2018 instead of the lucky Brett Cameron. Sir Graham Henry is a fan.

So take a breath, Canes fans. Have some patience. They need to persevere with Smith, because he will come right, as will the team.

In 2018, they were shoddy in their campaign opener, losing to the Bulls in Pretoria (why do they always seem to travel early to the Republic?), while in 2019 they scraped home against the Waratahs in Sydney in round one and were pegged back by the Crusaders in round two.

This Super Rugby championship will not be won or lost in February, under these exacting conditions. The Hurricanes would love a far slicker display against the Jaguares this weekend, but they are still good enough for second or third in the NZ conference. And Smith is good enough to lead them to those playoffs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Any No 10 these days who punts proficiently with his weaker (left) foot demands respect… and patience.

Besides which, the Hurricanes cannot possibly play as poorly again.

 In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search