Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The reason why London Irish couldn't convince Rob Simmons to stay

(Photo by Zac Goodwin/PA Images via Getty Images)

Declan Kidney has bemoaned the financial imbalance that ultimately made it impossible for London Irish to keep hold of ex-Wallabies lock Rob Simmons. The soon-to-be 34-year-old was unveiled as a new Clermont signing last Monday on a two-year deal through to the summer of 2025.

ADVERTISEMENT

English rugby has financially been under the cosh in recent times, the reduced salary cap restricting the level of funding clubs are able to spend on their squads. However, Kidney suggested that the cap drop to £5million per squad and the reduction from two to one marquee players sitting outside that budget wasn’t the reason they lost out on Simmons.

Instead, he explained that the different taxation systems at play in the UK and France was the decisive difference in Simmons deciding his future after the completion of the 2022/23 season was best served in the Top 14 rather than remain in the Gallagher Premiership with his three-year deal set to expire.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Salaries in excess of £150,000 in England are taxed at 45 per cent whereas, in France, Simmons would be considered non-resident, which means that rather than paying 49 per cent tax on earnings above €160,000, his tax rate would be just 30 per cent.

“The biggest difference really is the tax system,” explained Kidney when asked why London Irish had lost out to a French club in their effort to keep Simmons in the Premiership.

“There is just a different tax system for sportspeople in France and that gives them a decided advantage when it comes to recruiting players. I wouldn’t like to go into the area of tax expert, but over there it would be about half that [what it is in England].”

Simmons has been one of the best value-for-money recruits ever at London Irish, the 102-time Australian international playing 62 times so far for the club since joining in 2020 from the Super Rugby Waratahs. His near ever-presence is the characteristic that has most impressed Kidney.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The consistency of it is the standout feature. He is that reliable player in your squad. The fact that he has over 50 games is a fair achievement. He came to us with over 100 international caps and he has now got over 50 London Irish caps in what is a relatively short stint. Not many players manage to get that number and you know the way they do it in cricket, I wonder how many first-class games he has played in his career to date?”

It adds to up a very impressive total of 320 first-class games when Simmons’ 156 Super Rugby appearances for the Waratahs and the Reds are factored in. No wonder he has wielded such great influence in the London Irish dressing room.

“Leading by example, showing how much is within a player’s own control to get right, not looking to say my way is the right way but by just his consistency of performance, his consistency of preparation, his consistency of approach to it and yet being able to enjoy himself at the same time – it showed players here that you can do both,” enthused Kidney when asked what legacy the Australian will leave at the club.

“That is a huge skill for younger players to learn – they have to learn how to be good at their job and for me it is also important that they learn how to be good at their job and enjoy that at the same time. Some lads try so hard to do their job they get so serious, and they get tied up in knots. In Rob’s case, he can show you can be right in the middle of the intensity of it and then just have a bit of a craic then too.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search