Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The RFU rule Mike Tindall would happily bin to make England better

Mike Tindall during his England playing days (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

England Rugby World Cup winner Mike Tindall has claimed the RFU must rethink its approach and allow Test-level players who are based outside of the Gallagher Premiership to be made eligible for selection.

ADVERTISEMENT

Head coach Steve Borthwick is heading into the start of the 2024 Guinness Six Nations unable to select four players who were part of the England squad at the recent Rugby World Cup as they are playing their club rugby in France.

The Toulouse-based Jack Willis, Toulon’s David Ribbans, Stade Francais’ Joe Marchant and Racing 92’s Henry Arundell have all missed out on getting picked by Borthwick due to earning their living outside of the Premiership – and more players are set to join them across the Channel in 2024/25 and make themselves Test-selection ineligible.

Video Spacer

Stuart Lancaster on the mentors Henry Arundell has at Racing 92

Racing 92 coach Stuart Lancaster discusses the mentors young star Henry Arundell will have around him at the club, including Owen Farrell

Video Spacer

Stuart Lancaster on the mentors Henry Arundell has at Racing 92

Racing 92 coach Stuart Lancaster discusses the mentors young star Henry Arundell will have around him at the club, including Owen Farrell

It’s red tape that Tindall, the 2003 World Cup-winning midfielder, wants scrapping as quickly as possible. “There is a big thing with England at the moment about trying to protect the Premiership but I’m sort of the other side (of the argument),” he told In The Zone, the Gambling Zone podcast series.

“For years, the Premiership has paid other nations to house their great players. Faf de Klerk, Lood de Jager. A lot of South Africans have come and played in this league and then gone back and won World Cups and they are bringing up the next generation of players.

Related

“I have got no issues with English players going away and other people paying their salaries and then coming back and playing for their country,

“I would get rid of it at the moment just because of where we are salary cap-wise. You could get paid well to play in this country (before the cut)… That’s the thing we have got wrong, we have got to find a way so that even a club like Newcastle can become an attractive place to go and play.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need to guarantee they can get 10,000 fans through the turnstiles and at the moment we can’t do that with the way the league is set up but yet we drag our feet with his we should change things to make it better.

“There are things coming in from what I am hearing about trying to move things forward… but the rugby cog turns very slowly and we missed out on a chance during covid to change it fast and dramatically and it would have created a lot of interest.”

Tindall added: “We are playing catch up. Rugby is a game built on tradition and we love that tradition, but some of those traditions should go. How long ago did Will Carling have his moment with the committee and has that really changed? I don’t think it has.

“I don’t think we have anyone who is driving severe change but if someone does come in they normally don’t get anywhere because people don’t want to do they change. If we want rugby to survive, we have to flip it completely on its head.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If you look at every major sport, the club game drives everything. However, international rugby drives the sport, not club rugby. It’s the wrong way around. You have got the third biggest global sporting event in the Rugby World Cup, which is massive.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search