1
The Richie Mo'unga situation shows what's so wrong with rugby in New Zealand
This Richie Mo’unga situation sums up so much about what’s so wrong with rugby in New Zealand.
Mo’unga, who barely laced a boot in the last six months of 2021, is sitting out the start of Super Rugby Pacific.
ADVERTISEMENT
Fair play to the Crusaders’ first five-eighth, that’s what his New Zealand Rugby (NZR) contract entitles him to do and you can’t really quarrel with that.
Whether employees should be able to negotiate clauses in their contract that encourage them not to work is probably a debate for another time. Or, more to the point, a question for NZR to answer.
Video Player is loading.
None of us love going to the office but, if we want to get paid, then we simply have to get on with it.
My issue here is the signal.
Are there any games in the rugby calendar that actually matter? Is there any situation in which players simply have to play? Is there any stage when fans do actually get full value from their season memberships, merchandise purchases or television subscriptions?
Super Rugby Pacific looks a lame duck competition, that basically leaves us where we’ve already been for two years – with five useful New Zealand franchises and nothing else.
This season surely had to start with a bang and yet, here we have Mo’unga, arguably the most-dominant franchise player in recent seasons being given a spell.
ADVERTISEMENT
Why? Because this competition obviously doesn’t matter.
So what is important? Can NZR send us a list of the 2022 fixtures that will be worth our while?
Super Rugby clearly isn’t important and we know provincial footy is an inconvenience and embarrassment to all.
It can’t be the All Blacks that matter, otherwise there’d be a greater clamour for them to deliver on all the hype. Or better coaching and fewer sabbaticals for a pampered few.
Really and truly, how many All Blacks tests a year are of any consequence? The team played 15 times in 2021 and winning was an absolute priority in how many? I’d say four: the two Springbok games and then Ireland and France and, what do you know, the All Blacks lost three of them.
ADVERTISEMENT
A culture where playing is purely optional doesn’t do wonders for team cohesion, you’d imagine. What next? Negotiable effort?
The continuing Covid situation is a shame and certainly complicates things for administrators. But they could mitigate the disappointment of games going behind closed doors or
Moana Pasifika’s enforced absence from round one of Super Rugby Pacific by at least mandating that all fit All Blacks are on deck.
After all, we are a nation who will largely accept what’s mandated to us.
People do want to care, they do want to support their team, they do want to see rugby in this country succeed. But when they look up and see good players sitting games out, many of those people will also wonder why they bother.
Good luck to Mo’unga and good luck to the Crusaders who’ll play in his absence. But good luck to the fans as well, who’ll have a significantly worse team to cheer for over the opening three rounds.
This comes across as just another effort to be controversial.
Asking about how many games the All Blacks have to win as an absolute priority sums that up. ALL of them must be won. Why?
Not winning would see the same author on an endless chant for coaches to be sacked and players to be dumped.
Waxing lyrical because Mounga is looked after, on annual leave. Your opinion comes through as selfish, superficial and care-less regarding player welfare. Focussed on your pleasure and entertainment solely. Reminds us of the gladiators ( prisoners) fighting for their lives with stupid uncaring fans baying for blood. This Is what your article screams for.
I came across this article on Facebook & started reading it. Halfway down I started asking myself “who the hell is the idiot writing this rubbish?”, and a few more paragraphs later I guessed “this must be that fool Hamish Bidwell again”.
Lo & behold I ended up being right.
This opinion piece seems to ignore several issues:
With so many talented players having to retire early owing to serious injury I applaud what NZ rugby is doing to look after their players. Irish rugby is doing something similar. Flogging your most valuable asset cannot be a good strategy.
Another ignorant rugby hack comment. AB's lose at the end of the longest tour (3 months) since the early 1900's and this hack thinks there must be a lot wrong with NZ rugby.
Yeah right, let's run our players into the ground like the poms and French...
As if I should care, what an anonymous NH poster opines...
England & Wales are hardly shining examples of Rugby at present...
Disagree. All All Black games are must win. If we'd lost to Aust am sure you would have included them in games of consequence. Easy to pick and choose with hindsight. It was a long away tour where results suffered at the end. France and Ireland are in some good form as can also be seen this past weekend.
And on the player sabbaticals, the beginning of the comp is not the pressure end and if player welfare needs to come first to ensure we have the big guns still available for the games of consequence then I have no problem with that. Maybe if Warburton had a few sabaticals up north maybe his career would have lasted longer...?
Bingo. I'm sick of these endless sabbaticals. None come back better for it. Play or retire if you cant hack the pace.