Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Road to the Super Rugby Title Runs Through Ellis Park

Andries Ferreira of the Lions in action. Photo: Getty

It might sound crazy but it’s increasingly true: the Lions are the best Super Rugby team in South Africa. Jamie Wall looks at the side’s rise to the top of the standings and what that means for the looming playoffs.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a long road to the Super Rugby title these days. But now it’s looking like the end of it is going to go through Johannesburg for whoever wants to take the 2016 edition.

Someone busted out a 40oz of courage in the Lions’ pre-season camp and the former joke team of Super Rugby are now standing atop the table. Given their schedule, they’re a pretty safe bet to finish the regular season in that position too.

Do they deserve it? Well, sort of.

They’ve had the benefit of getting two matches each against the disappointing Jaguares and disgraceful Kings, plus a gimme against the Sunwolves. They’ve also dropped home games against the Crusaders and Hurricanes, the latter in which they hemorrhaged 50 points. The one shining result of their season was an away win in Hamilton against the Chiefs, the team they now hold a one-point lead on overall.

 
superrugby_banner

 

The Chiefs are just one of four NZ teams within a bonus point victory of the Lions, but only two of them will make the playoffs – such is the way of the equal-opportunity (read: making more money by keeping the South Africans interested) conference system.

But let’s give the Lions a bit of credit here. After all, they are the team that invented being crap at Super Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 20 editions of the competition, they’ve come last six times. They’ve come within three places of being of last nine more times.

Their list of men in charge would be Exhibit A in the case against why good players don’t automatically make good coaches. It could possibly be part of a wider trial indicting John Mitchell for his lifetime of crimes against rugby in general.

They’ve had several names in their existence: Transvaal, Gauteng, The Golden Cats, The Cats and finally the Lions. Ironically, it was under the laughable Golden Cats moniker that they had their most success, two consecutive Super 12 semi final appearances 15 very long seasons ago.

The cavernous Ellis Park is their home ground. It’s a fortress when filled to the brim with Springbok supporters, but Lions games barely warrant opening more than one grandstand.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is a team that once scored 65 points in a game and LOST.

Any Lions fan who’s stuck with the team along this endless road of despair deserves some sort of award for superhuman masochism. Given that, maybe we can cut the Lions a break here. So what if they haven’t had to play every New Zealand team twice? They’ve done it tough for long enough.

At the rate they’re going, they’ll most likely meet the Sharks (whom they’ve beaten twice already) then either the Waratahs or Brumbies in the playoffs. If they can win those matches, it’ll be all on against the last New Zealand team standing. They might even win.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search