Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Rugby Pod verdict on the 'horrendous' Freddie Steward red card

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images

The Rugby Pod has given its verdict on the red card given to England full-back Freddie Steward in Dublin last Saturday. Steward will attend a video conference disciplinary hearing on Tuesday evening and he will head into that judiciary with the backing of Pod co-hosts Jim Hamilton and Andy Goode, who branded the decision taken by referee Jaco Peyper as a horrendous call.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kicking off their review of the first-half incident in the England fixture that Ireland won to clinch the Guinness Six Nations Grand Slam, ex-Scotland lock Jim Hamilton took issue with Brian O’Driscoll’s support for the Steward sending-off.

“I was very surprised that Brian O’Driscoll said those comments that it is a red,” began Hamilton on the latest Rugby Pod episode. “I understand the safety element, we are all pushing in that direction. But having played the game and been in similar positions, that is a rugby incident. That is what it is.

“You have a play that has unfolded like that off the cuff… and Freddie Steward is braced for contact. The fact that was given a red card, I am just absolutely baffled. I would have been surprised by a yellow.

“To send him off, I looked at that and thought you have wrecked the game. I imagine a lot of people turned off when they saw that. That there was a rugby incident. What could Freddie Steward have done at that moment at high speed? Nothing.”

Fellow co-host Goode, the ex-England international, agreed. “He had 0.6 seconds from when the ball bounced to actually the contact that happened. Ireland win that game whether Freddie Steward is sent off or not. You feel for Freddie Steward. He is not a dirty player. I dived deep into my refereeing phonebook and many of them said it was not a red card.

“This is the problem with the head contact process, you go from one box to the next and the next. There needs to be empathy for certain things. This was an incident where he accelerated to try and get the ball and it went into Hugo Keenan’s hands, he tries to pull out, twists and it is an unfortunate accident.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You could have found mitigation by the height of Hugo Keenan when he makes the contact with Freddie Steward. Horrendous call.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
Z
Zak 641 days ago

Be in no doubt absurd ref and Tmo decisions like this will kill the game, it’s a contact sport and that’s why we watch, let’s enjoy what’s left of it without idiotic interpretations of the ever changing laws

g
grant 641 days ago

You cannot be complaining about the decision, we have to learn to accept it. Jaco Peyper is a good referee, he went through the protocol as laid out by World Rugby. There was no dissent or alternate scenario put forward by the AR's or TMO. By stating it is not a red card, whether you intend it or not, you are attacking the referee and his team. Your website has correctly being vocal supporting our referees through previous attacks (Wayne Barnes et al) throughout the Autumn Series and before. However right now, you are being no different than those you have previously called out for attacking referees. We have a brilliant bunch of referees currently. If we keep attacking them, they will leave the sport...imagine the scenario with poor referees, it wont be pretty. We are all passionate about our beloved sport, especially in a WC year. Lets support them, their intentions are only honorable

K
Kenneth 641 days ago

English are complaining to much they lost and thats it..
even if steward was there they would have still lost...Why the cry????? By the way Steward did have enough time too pull out from that incident if he could have twist too his side then he could've also went lower and make that tackle....Red was the right decision...It is Saturday again and they are still talking about that they are sour losers.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search