Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'sensitive' way red-carded Manu Tuilagi has reacted to his ban

(Photo by David Davies/PA Images via Getty Images)

Sale boss Alex Sanderson has provided an update on how Manu Tuilagi is coping with the ban he copped on Tuesday at a disciplinary hearing following last Saturday’s red card. The midfielder was sent-off at Franklin’s Gardens just 14 minutes into the Sharks’ Gallagher Premiership loss versus Northampton.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having been omitted from the England match day squad for both of the early games in the Guinness Six Nations against Scotland and Italy, Tuilagi had returned to Sale in the hope of putting in an impressive performance to improve his selection prospects ahead of the round three Test match away to Wales.

His red card for foul use of his forearm on Tommy Freeman shattered that ambition, however, and it left Tuilagi nursing a four-game ban that will be reduced to three if he successfully completes the World Rugby coaching intervention programme.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

That would free him up for England squad selection for the final round game against Ireland, but the likelihood is that Tuilagi won’t be picked by Steven Borthwick and won’t play again until Sale take on Cardiff in Wales on April 1. That would be quite a considerable six-week layoff for a player with the ambition of playing for England at the Rugby World Cup later this year.

“He is still upset,” said Sanderson when asked about Tuilagi at the Sale media briefing ahead of this Sunday’s Premiership trip to Exeter. “The situation he put the team in at the weekend, he was repentful for – and repentful is a very sensitive word. It wasn’t just sorry. It was like, ‘I’m going to make this up to you’.

Related

“Obviously, if you get a red you have to go through due process and get a further sanction. That happened. The meeting that we had for the nature of them – and I have sat in a few – was a good one if there is such a thing. It was a mid-range and he got two weeks off for mitigating good behaviour, historic good behaviour. Another week for coaching intervention so he is banned for three weeks which means he will miss this run and he will be good to go for the European Challenge Cup, the Cardiff game.”

Sale are currently second in the Premiership with hopes of going on to secure a home semi-final at the end of a season that could be the last for Tuilagi at the Manchester club as his future for the 2023/24 season remains unresolved amid speculation that he will leave for the Top 14.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Still trying to find a way,” said Sanderson regarding the Sale contract extension situation with Tuilagi. “We are constantly having conversations with the ever-changing, shifting climate that is the salary cap and the dispensation. It’s proving to be very difficult at the moment, as I have said in the past.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search