The silver lining of a move to the Crusaders for Levi Aumua
I’d do the same thing in Levi Aumua’s situation.
I suspect most of us would.
If the Moana Pasifika midfield back is to become a Crusader, then good luck to him.
I also can’t be critical of Aaron Mauger if, as has been reported, family reasons have forced him to step down as Moana Pasifika head coach.
These are individual, justifiable decisions of which I have no problem.
But they hardly augur well for Moana Pasifika, do they?
This is a franchise Super Rugby Pacific needs. It is a vehicle to keep Pasifika players out of Japan and Europe and into elite professional rugby in their own backyard, or near enough.
Now, I’d base the team in Nuku’alofa or Apia, not least because it would provide a competitive advantage, as evidenced by the Drua’s occasional deeds in Fiji.
Potentially losing Aumua’s services doesn’t help Moana Pasifika. Just as losing Mauger doesn’t either, even if it hopefully heralds an opportunity for assistant coach Filo Tiatia to get an overdue crack at a top job.
Aumua has the makings of an All Black. At 28, you doubt he’ll ever have a long career in the black jersey, but being a Crusader at least gives him the best opportunity to make it a reality.
But does it also cast Moana Pasifika in the role of the stepping stone? The team for provincial players, such as Tasman’s Aumua, to show their preparedness for New Zealand’s official Super sides?
Mauger has been quoted as saying this is not what Moana Pasifika was designed for, while also recognising what a move to the Crusaders would mean for Aumua himself.
That’s probably the best way to sum up this situation.
People like me can waffle on all we like, but what am I doing to improve Moana Pasifika’s lot and to make them the franchise of choice for aspiring players? Nothing.
Not one damn thing.
I’m moaning. I’m saying someone – usually New Zealand Rugby – has to do better, but what am I actually doing to help?
New Zealand Rugby, in this instance, have conjured a franchise out of nothing. They’ve given players and coaches and fans an opportunity that didn’t previously exist.
Now, it’s maybe not how I’d do it, but then I’m a media dribbler and not an administrator.
If a player, such as Aumua, uses that opportunity to make the All Blacks XV, as he did last year, and progress to the Crusaders and maybe the full All Blacks side, then doesn’t that partly show the worth of the exercise?
Aumua would arguably still be an inconsistent Mako without the exposure and expertise Moana Pasifika afforded him.
By broadening the base of New Zealand’s Super Rugby pyramid, a player now might be destined for the top who previously wasn’t.
Maybe the next player of Aumua’s ilk won’t jump ship. Maybe they’ll value the chance Moana Pasifika took on them and seek to make further progress from within that franchise.
Rather than lament what becomes of Moana Pasifika in Aumua’s absence, we could just as easily celebrate that the franchise is at least working as a development tool.
Over 20 players have been picked for the Island teams from MP so that majority number versus 1 going to another franchise is a win surely. Also even though results and some losses may be hard to watch MP and Drua play the most attractive style of rugby youngsters would love to emulate. Even in the big QF loss to the Saders the Drua showed 15 man rugby skills same as MP win against the Tahs. Just like the Warriors they need some experience sprinkled amongst them Lealifano can't do it all.
Super rugby lurches around aimlessly
I would rather see vibrant Proventil rugby with a north south state of origin and a few challenge match’s with the ‘strinos and pacific boys.. It would be naturally more even and more visceral.
The MP franchise will be dead soon. Moves like nicking their best player is selfish and short sighted. I can't blame the Crusaders or Aumua for that but the NZRU have set them up to fail and waste a bucketload of money. The tv audience will pick up that the MP games are meaningless and will not tune in. It is a another little step towards the gutting of the game here as rugby for men loses more meaning and player numbers.