Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The slight tactical fix for the All Blacks to make is an easy one

Jordie Barrett of New Zealand makes a kick during The Rugby Championship match between the New Zealand All Blacks and Argentina Pumas at Orangetheory Stadium on August 27, 2022 in Christchurch, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

The tactical adjustment for the All Blacks this week is an easy one to make to improve their chances of beating Los Pumas.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is clear the Argentinians are superior up front in strength, size and are well versed in the wrestle required to dismantle a carry-heavy game.

The All Blacks haven’t been all that strong at the breakdown in terms of generating quick ball, particularly when their ball carriers are met with multiple tacklers in contact.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

With 6o per cent possession they had nearly double the number of rucks as Argentina (107 vs 54) but could only find three points in the second half.

With only 15 kicks out of hand in Christchurch, the All Blacks need to find a better balance to vary their game and looking for more attacking kicks is the way to do that.

What we saw by the All Blacks against Los Pumas trended towards a Joe Schmidt-style phase attack.

Schmidt’s game plan with Ireland was very much a high possession game, cycling through a lot of phases and retaining the ball with few offloads.

ADVERTISEMENT

The launch plays were articulately designed with running lines that required exquisite timing.

The attack opened up the defence most of the time based on planned scheme rather than instinctual opportunity or the use of promoting the ball in the tackle.

It was brilliant and worked in part because mastermind Johnny Sexton was pulling the strings.

However, the detail required to pull Schmidt’s game off is not within the capability of this All Blacks team right now.

Their ruck work is too inefficient, the players are not used to executing running lines with timing to perfection they way Irish players are trained to.

ADVERTISEMENT

And they don’t have a No 10 who demands as such, with neither Richie Mo’unga or Beauden Barrett at the level of Sexton’s ball playing or command running a complex attack.

They have other strengths that Sexton doesn’t, but cannot replicate his genius in running a similar structured attacking game. He ensures others know their role as much as his own and that is integral to making it click.

While it takes time to lift the standards of the All Blacks’ play with ball-in-hand, smarter game management is required to turn teams around, particularly Los Pumas.

Their strength in contact and the ground has to be negated, which means steering clear of too much contact in close and spending too much time trying to break down a brick wall.

The All Blacks need to spread them out with a game that goes from tramline-to-tramline quickly and then get boot to ball when it doesn’t work.

Run the launch plays as planned, but after the strike look to the air or in behind to force the Pumas backfield to cover contestable chips, grubbers, or bombs.

Argentina have imploded in the past against the All Blacks, playing a hand in their own downfall trying to play too much.

The helter-skelter style they played in the past would give turnover opportunities for the All Blacks to dine on.

In 2017 they were leading 22-15 in New Plymouth before a Pumas turnover from a failed exit was spun wide to blindside flanker Vaea Fifita who scored a blistering try to change the game.

In 2018 in Buenos Aires the ball spilled out of a ruck after Batista Delguy was unfortunately concussed running it out from deep and Rieko Ioane scooped up the turnover to put the All Blacks up 21-3 at halftime.

Nico Sanchez gave up a 50-metre intercept try to Brodie Retallick in 2019 right before halftime and they ended up losing the test 20-16 with that try being the difference.

In the 2020 rematch won 38-0 by the All Blacks it was two quick tries to Will Jordan, one off a dropped Pumas’ pass and another from an intercept, that broke the game open.

Argentina have decided not to overplay their hand with a more conservative approach so those type of turnovers have dried up, but if they have to clean up a few more kicks, they will be forced to scramble more and anything can happen.

Lucio Cinti, Emiliano Boffelli and Juan Cruz Mallia are not the most experienced back three together, while Boffelli is a fullback playing right wing.

Caleb Clarke’s try came after exposing his sliding hesitant defence on the right flank. Once you identify a tendency, you have to go after it and the home side did not do that in Christchurch.

The ability to adapt to the situation in-game has been lacking for this All Blacks team, along with inconsistent decision-making.

After a missed Jordie Barrett penalty early in search of three points to opening their account, the next penalty was kicked to the corner and successfully resulted in a maul try.

On one hand they wanted three, moments later they wanted a try.

Later on in the match a low percentage 60-metre attempt was taken, yet deep into the game with the Pumas nursing a small lead, the All Blacks kicked to the sideline instead of trying to narrow the lead with threes after struggling to make inroads previously.

Codie Taylor’s subsequent throws spoiled the opportunities but the decision-making throughout the game was all over the shop.

As the bout entered the late rounds, the All Blacks weren’t willing to win the test ugly like the visitors were, who kept ticking over the scoreboard with six penalties and only bagged one opportunist try.

If the test plays out like that again they have to win by the means necessary and that means chipping away at the lead if most of the shots have fired blanks to that point.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
C
ColinK 812 days ago

I just read Aaron Smith talking about getting focused on playing our game and that Argentina don't want to play. On Newshub. This is our problem we are stuck in past glories, the game has changed and we are not adapting. Argentina play to win period while we seem focused on aesthetic issues. We need to focus on the opposition method and break it down. This is not new for the AB's but a long period of dominance has made us arrogant.

F
Flatcoat 812 days ago

The solution is obvious..Problem is we don't have a 1/5 with a decent tactical kicking game..Once a basic skill of a Game Manager/playmaker.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search