Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The strange tale of the 1994 Women's World Cup...

Gill Burns with the 1994 World Cup

Being part of a team that loses a World Cup after taking part in a final is a tough experience for most players.

ADVERTISEMENT

But in the case of England’s Gill Burns it was a very different experience to that experienced by her male counterparts in 1991, 2007 and 2019.

And even more incredibly, over a generation later, a happy ending has emerged to this story.

The first thing that sets this story apart is that rather than suffering defeat in the 1994 final England’s women lifted the trophy thanks to a 38-23 win over the USA in Edinburgh.

Video Spacer

All Blacks react to USA win

Video Spacer

All Blacks react to USA win

As per the men’s 2003 win, the trophy then went out on tour and roadshows around the country where – even in those pre-smartphone days – it became an oft-photographed item.

However, England then suffered the agony of losing the World Cup – in this case literally.

The trophy, which had previously been in the care of the USA who were winners of the inaugural tournament in 1991, disappeared off the face of the earth and had to be replaced by a new version.

But it has now been found in a box in an attic owned by the parents of an unnamed administrator attached to the English women’s game.

Burns, who is one of the best-known names in English rugby after an international career spanning more than a decade, explained to ITV News how the discovery came about.

ADVERTISEMENT

She said: “A few years after the tournament we started asking: ‘Does anyone know where the World Cup is?’

“Then a few weeks ago one of the old administrators was clearing out her parents’ loft and found some old notebooks, handbooks and poster.

“And behind them was a box containing the treasured World Cup.”

The winning 1994 England team with the trophy
ADVERTISEMENT

As one of the players who shared in England’s 1994 success, she described herself as “very emotional to find the trophy.”

The trophy has been taken to Twickenham where it is being put on display by the World Rugby Museum.

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jfp123 46 minutes ago
Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France

It will be great if Jalibert improves in defence, but unless and until he improves substantially, I think he should be out of the running for the national team. If you look at the French A side, attack is not usually so much of a problem - they scored 200 points in the last 6 nations without MJ on the pitch. Defence however can be an issue, Penaud isn’t the greatest in that area for a start. So a 10 who is solid in defence is badly needed. And given his poor defence record, MJ would be bound to be targeted by shrewd coaches like Rassi and Razor, so he needs to be able to withstand that.

Also, given sufficient improvement in defence, there are still factors which tell against MJ. I think the 7/1 bench has been a very successful experiment, and for that you need flexible backs who can play in more than one position in case of injury. Then there’s how well the 10 plays with France’s best 9, Dupont. And even if you think MJ is better when there’s no Dupont or 7/1 split, stability in a test team is important, so it’s better not to go chopping and changing the 10 needlessly. There’s also the question of temperament - MJ doesn’t shine at his brightest when it really matters, eg WC quarters and Top14 finals, and look at his test record over the past 2 years.

I see Ntamack as by far the best option at 10. Rugby is a team game, and apart from his excellent defence, there’s his partnership with Dupont, his versatility, and all the other skills that go to making a great team player and a great 10. He’s excellent under the high ball, an area where France tend to have a weakness, and has fine strategic and team management skills, great handling skills and so on.

While having star quality is important, it’s not the be all and end all, as illustrated by UBB this season. Imo, though undoubtedly very good, they underperformed. With best wings, best 9, as Dupont barely played in the Top14, with Jalibert and leading centres and 15, plus a strengthened forward pack, they couldn’t match ST in points scored, despite the latter’s huge injury list which left some positions seriously weakened, at least on paper.

For next season, I hope ST are back to their scintillating best with injuries healed, that LBB is back to rude health for UBB, that the exciting promise of La Rochelle’s and Toulon’s new recruits bears fruit, Bayonne continue to defy their budget and we have a cracking, highly competitive Top14 and Les Bleus triumphant in the autumn internationals and six nations!

266 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING British & Irish Lions player ratings vs First Nations & Pasifika XV | 2025 British & Irish Lions player ratings vs First Nations & Pasifika XV