Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The strange tale of the 1994 Women's World Cup...

Gill Burns with the 1994 World Cup

Being part of a team that loses a World Cup after taking part in a final is a tough experience for most players.

ADVERTISEMENT

But in the case of England’s Gill Burns it was a very different experience to that experienced by her male counterparts in 1991, 2007 and 2019.

And even more incredibly, over a generation later, a happy ending has emerged to this story.

The first thing that sets this story apart is that rather than suffering defeat in the 1994 final England’s women lifted the trophy thanks to a 38-23 win over the USA in Edinburgh.

Video Spacer

All Blacks react to USA win

Video Spacer

All Blacks react to USA win

As per the men’s 2003 win, the trophy then went out on tour and roadshows around the country where – even in those pre-smartphone days – it became an oft-photographed item.

However, England then suffered the agony of losing the World Cup – in this case literally.

The trophy, which had previously been in the care of the USA who were winners of the inaugural tournament in 1991, disappeared off the face of the earth and had to be replaced by a new version.

But it has now been found in a box in an attic owned by the parents of an unnamed administrator attached to the English women’s game.

Burns, who is one of the best-known names in English rugby after an international career spanning more than a decade, explained to ITV News how the discovery came about.

ADVERTISEMENT

She said: “A few years after the tournament we started asking: ‘Does anyone know where the World Cup is?’

“Then a few weeks ago one of the old administrators was clearing out her parents’ loft and found some old notebooks, handbooks and poster.

“And behind them was a box containing the treasured World Cup.”

The winning 1994 England team with the trophy
ADVERTISEMENT

As one of the players who shared in England’s 1994 success, she described herself as “very emotional to find the trophy.”

The trophy has been taken to Twickenham where it is being put on display by the World Rugby Museum.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

j
johnz 32 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

This is such a devisive issue in New Zealand, Razor is a brave man; people tend to take polarising stands of all or nothing positions. I suspect there's a balanced compromise, if people are able to discuss the pros and cons rationally. There are good arguments from both sides of the debate, and as with all controversial issues, the solution is rarely black and white.


But let's take the Barrett vs Mounga debate, a topic that never grows old. I think some context is in order when Barrett is proclaimed as "loyal", while it seems to be insinuated that Mo'unga is not.


A little history is needed regarding Barrett's loyalty - so far he has had 2 (or 3?) sabbaticals, which are really just overseas-based All Black's by stealth. Since he left the Hurricanes, he's 'been a bit part player at the Blues at best, while his performances at SR level have left plenty to be desired. As of last season, he quit NZ Rugby for Japan. It's concievable the rise of Mounga played a part in that decision, while Mounga's subsequent departure appears to have played a part in BB's return.


Prior to returning, BB tried to negotiate a contract to be the 1st official overseas-based player. So loyal? Maybe. Opportunistic? Probably. It's clear Barrett's first instinct was not commitment and sacrifice to the coalface of Super Rugby.


I don't recall a Mo'unga being awarded a sabatical at all, and he has been a far bigger contributor than Barrett has at Super Rugby level for quite some time. Perhaps NZR just didn't value Mo'unga enough to bend the rules the same as they have for Barrett?


NZR have always massaged the rules for Barrett and expended a lot of financial resources to keep his services. At the same time, our player depth get's stripped away, as premier SR players, such as Plumber and Burke, take off for better pay cheques elsewhere.


Personally, I wouldn't mind if the big wage bill for a few aging stars like Barrett are shared with Japan. I'm not convinced Barrett's adding much at SR level and the money could be used elsewhere. Just as long as there's no guarantee of a jersey for such marque players, I don't see a big issue.

33 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Seven Springboks make World Rugby men’s 15s dream team of the year Seven Springboks make World Rugby men’s 15s dream team of the year
Search