Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The strategic ploy used by both Ireland and France in their wins over the All Blacks

(Photos By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images and John Berry/Getty Images)

In both the All Blacks‘ losses to Ireland and France, it was the opposition who scored the first try to jump out to early leads.

ADVERTISEMENT

That was a result of a clear tactic to turn down available shots in goal to attack the All Blacks and pile on pressure according to former All Black hooker James Parsons, who said that both sides were ‘relentless’ in their pursuit of tries in the first half.

Speaking on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod, Parsons highlighted the trend of turning down points early to take an all-or-nothing approach.

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

“The one thing we do have to step back and have a look at, is the way the French and the Irish applied pressure,” Parsons said.

“What I mean by that is they came with a clear plan and I don’t know if the French copied Ireland, but they stopped taking their points.

“We normally see teams take the points early against the All Blacks and they try to build that scoreboard pressure, but they were relentless both times in those first forty minutes in the sense that they kicked to the corner.

“They said ‘right, we are going to suck some energy out of you’, and it’s all-or-nothing. It’s a bit of gamble, but it’s an all-or-nothing play.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In Dublin, Ireland fell behind to a 5-10 halftime deficit but had dominated the possession and territory stakes after using the tactic to aggressively take on the All Blacks.

A 12th minute penalty was kicked to the corner by Jonathan Sexton to attempt their first maul. After drawing another advantage, some quick hands to the edge found James Lowe who was able to score in the corner.

With the score at 5-3, Ireland again turned down a kickable three to apply more pressure after winning a scrum penalty in the 23rd minute. They would enter the All Blacks’ 22 six more times in the half only to be repelled each time with no reward for their efforts.

Right on halftime, Ireland turned down multiple shots at goal in search of a second try but a poor line out throw left them with nothing.

ADVERTISEMENT

The strategy paid dividends in the second half when they struck in the 44th minute and again in the 51st after the heavy toll of defensive work seemed too much. Once they had a seven point lead, the tactic changed.

“Then, both sides [France and Ireland], switched to taking points in the second half because they knew they had that lead and they just had to chip away in threes and keep that scoreboard building to the point where the pressure was enough for the All Blacks to keep chancing their arm,” Parsons said.

“They [All Blacks] obviously did chance their arm [against France], the turning point of not nailing that kick chase and then the French going all the way back and Ardie unfortunately getting penalised and yellow carded.

“They knew if they scored there it would be a tough place to come back from, so it was an all-or-nothing play from the All Blacks. That’s due to the way they structured their game, the French, Ireland did the same.

“It puts your skillset, and I suppose your mindset, under pressure. You’ve heard Fozzy, Sam Whitelock and Cane all talk about composure in the big moments, I think the lesson they will take out of this for all the young guys that they’ve blooded this year is going to be massive for them, having now experienced it and not overcome it.

“They’ll be having those feelings and having those discussions, ‘how do we best get around this next time so that we come out the other end of these games’.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

5 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Watch: Retallick scores, Perenara makes Black Rams debut -Japan Rugby League One Retallick scores; Perenara makes debut -Japan Rugby League
Search