Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The stunning transformation of George Ford

The stunning transformation of George Ford

Two weeks ago, Leicester dished up one of the worst opening performances in recent memory, leading to the sacking of head coach Matt O’Connor.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since that decision the Tigers have rebounded emphatically, blitzing Newcastle in the first half in their home opener at Welford Road and piling 35 points on at the Ricoh despite being down to 14-men for most of the match.

Worries of a dead cat bounce look to be misguided after the follow-up 6-point loss to Wasps, as the schizophrenic Tigers have transformed into a dangerous attacking side and one man at the centre of this is flyhalf George Ford.

He is playing like the weight has been lifted off his shoulders, without the fear of repercussions, ripping teams apart with guile and daring bravado.

You can’t go from being that bad to this good overnight. There is only one explanation for this, and it is a sad indictment on O’Connor – he is a coach who gets the worst out of his players, and that is the worst kind of coach.

Video Spacer

When a coach is at odds with his team, restraining their natural talents and failing to find a way for their skills to flourish, the conflict permeates into performance. Ford’s aimless and meandering play under O’Connor’s direction has disappeared overnight, replaced by an attacking genius looking to tear teams apart with ball-in-hand.

The shackles have been removed and we are seeing the best of George Ford – 5 line breaks, 12 defenders beaten, three try assists and one try for himself in just two games. That doesn’t include the involvement in the lead-up work to many other Tiger tries.

ADVERTISEMENT

It can be impossible from the outside to know how the players are feeling about their coach, or how their relationship with the coach is impacting their play. But in this case, the evidence is overwhelming. There has been no change except for the removal of Matt O’Connor and Ford is now, statistically, the best attacking 10 in the competition.

The Tigers have opened up the playbook, looking to run from their own 22 at times, testing the defence before exiting. They are actually gelling from set-piece attack and in phase play, and Ford’s play has been instrumental in all of this.

It might seem harsh on O’Connor, but this is a coach who has been sacked or let go from the last three teams he’s been at, with the same issues persisting at each stop over the last five years. The modern game is evolving at such rapid pace as rule changes bring about new strategies, every four years is like a decade in rugby years. When coaches are employed based on successes from the late 2000’s or even early 2010’s, it can be like still using a Nokia flip phone when the iPhone is here. Unless they have evolved as well it is a recipe for disaster.

Why teams continue to hand out contracts to old relics is a mystery, and now after O’Connor’s third failed stint in a row, this should surely be the end until he proves himself in lower grades. He should be on every club’s blacklist until that happens, unless they want to nosedive fast.

ADVERTISEMENT

One man can make all the difference, which is why O’Connor had to go – without him Leicester, and George Ford, are far better off.

In other news:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Let's be real about these All Blacks Let's be real about these All Blacks
Search