Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'The things they wrote are not acceptable' - Former Argentina captain Contepomi on Pumas' racism controversy

Contempomi during his playing days with Argentina.

Former Argentina captain Felipe Contepomi says that racist social media posts by three Pumas players which recently came to light are “not acceptable.” Argentina’s Guido Petto, Santiago Socino and captain Pablo Matera have been at the centre of a racism storm after old social media posts resurfaced in the wake of the Pumas’ 38-0 defeat to the All Blacks last month.

ADVERTISEMENT

All three players were suspended, with Matera also stripped of the captaincy, only for the UAR to reverse the decision and reinstate the players just two days later. Matera had posted an apology for his comments before deleting his social media accounts.

Yesterday World Rugby released a statement welcoming an investigation into the matter.

Video Spacer

The utterly ruthless way Shaun Edwards transforms rugby teams | RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

The utterly ruthless way Shaun Edwards transforms rugby teams | RugbyPass Offload

And speaking shortly before that statement was released, former Argentina out-half Contepomi, who is currently working as attack coach with Leinster, had his say on the issue.

“I condemn totally anything coming from racism or xenophobic comments,” Contepomi said.

“Having said that, they were tweets from eight, nine years ago when these guys were youths. One thing for me that is important to understand is rugby is a way to not only to make (people) better players, but more so help you to be a better person.

“I know Matera had a troublesome youth in terms of some personal issues, in terms of family issues and maybe it wasn’t the best time (in his life) when he wrote those things. The person he is now probably doesn’t reflect what he wrote on those days, (but) it’s not an excuse.

“It is good to see that rugby played a part in informing them, making them better persons. Having said that if that had been written a year ago or this year… the things they wrote are not acceptable. They are not acceptable. Full stop.”

The way the issue was handled led to Ugo Monye stating that rugby has a problem in how it deals with racism.

“I’ve been so frustrated,” Monye told the BBC. “Rugby doesn’t know how to deal with racism, hence why we have seen a U-turn within 48 hours.

“Racism seems to be this outlier forever because no-one wants to own up to it. If you’ve got the union saying it’s immature, that’s what they think it is. Just so we are clear, the comments are not immature — they are racist and vile.”

Contepomi says he understands why Monye would be frustrated with how the UAR dealt with the matter.

“If it (reinstatement) is 24 hours or two weeks later, that’s a process that I haven’t been involved in so I don’t know what’s been going on and why they reinstated them, or, suspended them in the first place. So I can’t comment on what is going on internally,” Contepomi added.

“But yeah, I understand where Ugo is coming from, because I would be in the same boat in terms of I don’t accept racism. I wouldn’t put it in terms of time, just to make that clear, because it’s a tricky question and my English maybe doesn’t help me to explain the thing I want to explain. It’s not about time, it’s more about fairness or justice.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search