Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The three teams Victor Matfield believes can win the World Cup

Victor Matfield. (Photo by Tertius Pickard/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Former Springboks captain Victor Matfield believes there are only three teams capable of winning all three of their knockout matches to win this month’s World Cup in Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

The tournament begins next Friday as the Brave Blossoms host Russia in Tokyo, and many nations have been tipped to challenge for the Webb Ellis Cup in what’s being considered the most open World Cup in recent history.

New Zealand, England, Ireland, South Africa and Wales are among as many as seven teams that have been mentioned as potential title-winners come November 2.

However, Matfield, who played 127 tests between 2000 and 2015 and was a key part of the Springboks’ 2007 World Cup success in France, said it was clear in his mind who the three genuine contenders are.

“There’s always something to fear. If you look at how the World Cup is set up, there’s seven teams that could beat each other on any given day,” he said at the Sandton offices of Investec on Wednesday.

“Any of those teams can beat New Zealand and South Africa.

“However‚ I think there’s only three big teams that can win three consecutive knock-out games. All of them are dangerous‚ especially Ireland.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Matfield has been impressed with the quality shown by Schmidt’s side over the past couple of seasons, and is of the belief that that could translate into World Cup glory.

“We’ve seen what Ireland have done in the past two years. They are the No.1 team, even though they haven’t shown the same form in the past year.

“You never know though, as they could peak at the right time. Their coach Joe Schmidt is a clever guy. He’s got an experienced squad that can beat any team. They’re going to be a dangerous side.

“He’s got an experienced one that can beat any team. They’ve also beaten everyone recently so they’re going to be a dangerous side,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa’s opening World Cup clash against the All Blacks looms as one of the most significant pool fixtures of the tournament, and the absence of Brodie Retallick due to injury could sway the result, according to Matfield.

The former second rower emphasised how Retallick’s talent across the park would be sorely missed by Steve Hansen’s side, despite the presence of Scott Barrett as his replacement.

“Scott Barrett is there and he’s a good replacement. He’s been fantastic for the Crusaders as a number four lock. He doesn’t have the same skill set as Retallick who gets the ball in the midfield for the All Blacks. He gives them width on attack, whereas Barrett is a hard grafter and probably has a higher work rate than Retallick.

“It’s the Brodie skill set that he doesn’t have from a decision-making and playmaking perspective. That’s where Retallick is important for them,” Matfield said.

The All Blacks and Springboks open their World Cup campaigns against each other in Yokohama next Saturday, while Ireland face Scotland at the same venue the day after.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarrior 59 minutes ago
Records show All Blacks' greatest rugby adversary is now Ireland

Foster was literally whinging about the TMO in the Ireland series in the presser AFTER the RWC final. NZs whinging about the final itself was apparently picked up by Voyager 2 which was near the asteroid belt. What about the whingefest and crybabies after O'Mahony's legendary sledge (during the match) on Sam Cane?


I often hear talk about NZ players being poisoned or similar nonsense during the 1995 final. NZ boast that they are 'superstars' and 'humble heroes' on their own website. You gave England the same treatment in 2002-2003, calling them arrogant just because they beat you. They told the rest of us then what you were like, we should have listened. I would give as much credence to a NZ supporter disliking us, as I would to Krusty the clown saying the same thing. Let's just say your judgement may not be the best.


Regarding 2016, as the referee had basically let NZ away with cheating their way to victory via filthy dangerous play and fouling he was hardly going to pull Sexton up when clearly trying to stop a grounding. NZ always leave the boot or arm in to hurt a try scorer but that seems to be invisible to you entitles lot.


BTW NZ have literally being whinging and crying about Ireland since Soldier field. You are just very bad losers. We will be delighted to be shot of you on Friday. I hope we do so with a win, so that you rethink your philosophy of mocking opponents and spectators you've just beaten.


After the match last Saturday the internet was full of Kiwi supporters basically abusing English folk. Where is your national honour? Where is your national integrity?

9 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ England need to face a few home truths if they are to relearn that winning habit England need to face a few home truths if they are to relearn that winning habit
Search