Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The tongue-in-cheek name the All Blacks have given their 'bomb squad'

(Photo by Jean Catuffe/Getty Images)

Replacement back-rower Dalton Papali’i has revealed the tongue-in-cheek name he has come up with for the All Blacks subs bench heading into their Rugby World Cup final clash versus the Springboks and their famed ‘bomb squad’.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa’s bench has been a hot topic in Paris ahead of the decider after the way it managed to turn a 6-15 semi-final deficit into a jaw-dropping 16-15 win over England last weekend with a late 10-point surge in which sub second row RG Snyman pounced for a try and sub out-half Handre Pollard added five points off the kicking tee.

However, rather than feel daunted by the ‘bomb squad’ and its fearsome reputation dating back to the 2019 World Cup in Japan, Papali’i has let slip how the All Blacks view their own bench.

Video Spacer

Argentina v New Zealand

Argentina v New Zealand : Watch highlights, reaction and more at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

Argentina v New Zealand

Argentina v New Zealand : Watch highlights, reaction and more at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

“I’ll tell you a quick story,” he quipped at a midweek media briefing at the Paris Country Club. “I have got a little group happening in the team room at our hotel and we are watching Band of Brothers and the 101st Airborne and their Easy Company.

“So, I made a little joke saying, ‘You know they have got the ‘bomb squad’, so we could have the ‘easy company’. We want to go and finish the job and be in the trenches.

Fixture
Rugby World Cup
New Zealand
11 - 12
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

“Talking about the bomb squad, man, they have proven themselves. They can come on and change a game like that, so we sort of need to identify whoever is on the bench and need to really be screwed on up top and give it hell.”

Forwards coach Jason Ryan also gave his assessment on the South African bench. “It would be good to take some gas out of that bomb, wouldn’t it?

ADVERTISEMENT

“They have got their DNA as a forward pack. We have got trust in our plan this week and we believe we will be able to be there right until the end.

“They [South Africa] are just playing to their strengths. It’s a big part of what they do. It’s worked for them. We have got a good plan. The referees will make their decision on what they see. Those pictures have got to be clear, especially in big moments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
A
Anand 436 days ago

If NZ go down earlier against SA
I'd label the bench as the Kamikaze - Do or Die Squad 💀

Personally l, I don't think SA stands a chance against this AB’s squad - 2 much Experience and Fire Power

T
Turlough 436 days ago

“The referees will make their decision on what they see. Those pictures have got to be clear, especially in big moments.”

NZ will try to play Barnes again. Don’t think it will work in the scrum this time as they blew their load against Ireland.

E
Erhard 436 days ago

Cute

O
Ol'Misty 436 days ago

This is getting weird. SA would have the ‘Artillery Squad’ if the AB’s plan on being ‘Easy Company’ and getting in trenches. Ugh, no more War analogies please - especially incorrect ones…while you’re in EUROPE.

I thought it was kind of ridiculous the Boks ripping ‘Bomb Squad’ off the AB’s first and proper use of it in a rugby context to describe their back 3’s focus on the aerial skills needed to diffuse the high kick tactics, of Australia especially, in the 2011 world cup. It hardly relates to rolling on fatties to replace the first bunch of tired fatties. Buy hey ho, imitation is the highest form of flattery and all that I guess.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 9 hours ago
The future of rugby: Sale and Leinster mount the case for the defence

I think the argument behind the future of Rugby and defence vs attack is a pertinent one but also misses a big point. Rugby is a game about momentum and big swings of momentum makes games entertaining. You get and lose momentum in a few ways. You kick a 50-22 after defending for multiple phases (huge momentum swing), you get two penalties in a row thanks to bad opposition discipline allowing you to peel of large meters, you maintain large amounts of territory and possession tiring opponents out, you get a penalty from the set piece, a yellow or red card etc. The laws in the past years that have made the biggest impact has addressed stale games where no team can seize the momentum. The 50-22 has been a raging success as it allows huge momentum swings. The interpretations around ruck time and changes there to favour the team in possession has allowed sides like Ireland to wear teams down with possession-based play and maintain and build momentum. The Dupont law (which killed momentum) and now the reversing of it has had a huge impact and now the access interpretation of the laws around kick chases which forces teams and players to allow access to the catcher is set to make a big impact and everyone loves it because it allows a contest on the catch and more importantly could lead to huge swings in momentum. The worst laws have failed to allow teams to seize momentum. When rugby allowed teams to pass the ball back into the 22 and clear it was clearly a bad law as it allowed nobody to build momentum. Clearly the laws that changed several penalty offences around ruck and set piece to free kicks was aimed at speeding up the game but was a poor law because it killed momentum as teams would infringe regularly without major consequences from penalties and also it did not reward the team that made a big play to win possession from a penalizable offence. In the modern game you can win matches in many ways. You can dominate possession and territory like Ireland or play off counterattack and turnovers like France. You can dominate with the set piece and seize momentum that way like SA, or stifle teams with momentum killing defence. You can run strike moves off first and second phase and score in the blink of an eye like NZ. Every team with every style has a chance. World cup finals are all about ensuring that your opponent cannot seize momentum. Every team is so afraid to make mistakes that give away momentum that they play conservatively until they no longer can afford to. The game favours no style and no type of play and thats why the big 4 teams are so closely matched. In the end it all comes down to execution and the team that executes better wins. For my mind that is a well balanced game and it is on the right track.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Springboks dominate my team of 2024 – Andy Goode Springboks dominate team of 2024 – Andy Goode
Search