Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The truth about coaching turnover in the rugby union

Geordan Murphy faces the media (Getty Images)

Job security as a professional rugby head coach in Europe isn’t quite as fragile as an English Premier League soccer manager.

ADVERTISEMENT

A record 15 top league soccer bosses (75 percent) fell by the wayside last term, and Jose Mourinho’s axing by Manchester United on Tuesday means the figure for this season now stands at three heading towards Christmas.
The rugby scene isn’t as volatile, but it isn’t short of managerial upheaval either. A Rugby Pass survey of the 66 European clubs operating in the PRO14, Top 14, Premiership, Championship and Pro D2 leagues has found that 20 clubs changed their main man during 2018.

This 30.3 percent turnover lends credence to last week’s brusque claim by new Northampton boss Chris Boyd that the European scene isn’t for the faint-hearted.

He has a point. Back in his native New Zealand, you recently had the curious situation of axed Blues boss Tana Umaga, rather than being shown the Eden Park door, given an assistant’s role to soften the blow after three years of failure as head of the organisation.

Blues coach Tana Umaga. Photo / Getty Images

‘It [European rugby] is a ruthless place,’ said Boyd in a recent interview. ‘If you get it right it’s great, and if you don’t then you go and that’s how it is.

‘I 100 percent agree with it – that’s the nature of the beast. There’s a demand here for performance… if you want security you’d never be a rugby coach.’

ADVERTISEMENT

Boyd’s comments were perhaps realisation of his own difficult teething situation following his summer arrival from the Super Rugby-winning Hurricanes franchise.

Northampton don’t have a track record as a sacking club. Jim Mallinder held the Franklin’s Gardens reins for 10 years before he was cut last December.

However, the Saints head back into Premiership action this Friday at Worcester occupying 10th spot after just three wins in nine outings. That leaves them just two points clear of bottom side Newcastle and very much in the thick of a relegation battle where just four points separate seven clubs.

Boyd might be feeling nervous, but rugby doesn’t quite yet mirror the trigger-happy English soccer scene. Rob Baxter is in his 10th season as Exeter boss, Mark McCall his ninth at Saracens, Dai Young his eighth at Wasps while Steve Diamond and Dean Richards are each into their seventh season in charge respectively at Sale and Newcastle.

ADVERTISEMENT
Jim Mallinder, (R) and Dorian West

If rugby was soccer, interim Leicester boss Geordan Murphy would have been the recipient of very different news on Tuesday 105 days after he agreed to fill-in in September for the ousted Matt O’Connor.

They don’t hang about chopping and changing in the round ball game. Nik Daws had just 91 days in charge at Scunthorpe, Michael Collins 77 at Bradford City and Harry Kewell just 74 before the plug was pulled at Notts County.

But rather than Murphy suffering a similar fate for his underachievement, Tigers instead opted to permanently hand him the reins even though the Welford Road club is currently under the storm cloud of a deflating eight-match losing run, something not experienced since the dim and distant amateur era days of 1975.

This vote of confidence in their rookie head coach is a better reflection on an organisation that unceremoniously axed O’Connor, who arrived in March 2017, just a single game into this season.

One September match was also all James Buckland had as Ealing head coach. However, because he was working under director of rugby Ben Ward, the rate of expendability in the Championship for 2018 is similar to the Premiership’s 25 percent turnover.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

London Irish, Nottingham and Yorkshire have rung changes at the top, but with contrasting fortunes.

While Declan Kidney, Nick Kennedy’s successor, has Irish on track for a swift Premiership return, Yorkshire newcomer Chris Stirling, who worked with Boyd at the Hurricanes, will be feeling edgy that things are not working out in Leeds.
His team are bottom of the division after just one win in nine, they suffered a 67-point drubbing at Irish while average attendances of just 1,500 further highlights how weak the club’s ambitions are of a return to the Premiership. A drop to National League is more likely without sharp improvement.

Declan Kidney

Just six changes across England’s 24 clubs sounds restrained compared to some goings-on elsewhere. Three of the four Welsh regions changed their men at the helm in 2018.

Bernard Jackman’s exit from Dragons last week was the latest alteration following Ospreys’ January sacking of Steve Tandy and the decision of Cardiff’s Danny Wilson to take up an assistant’s role at Wasps.

It will become a clean sweep next May when Wales-coach-in-waiting Wayne Pivac bids adieu to Scarlets.

Celtic neighbours Ireland are regularly lauded for their top-down, IRFU-run model, but even their union in Dublin don’t take bad provincial results lightly.

Les Kiss and Kieran Keane found this out to their cost at Ulster and Connacht respectively, Keane ousted from Galway just a year into his proposed three-year relationship. Meanwhile, Munster has too long been a merry-go-round, the club having five different coaches in charge since they last lifted a trophy in 2011.

This demand for success is currently at its most cut-throat in the second tier French league as five of the 16 PRO D2 clubs switched main men in 2018.

Colomiers were the latest to blink, a dressing room player vote of no confidence last week resulting in the ousting of Olivier Baragnon after just a season and a half at the helm.

That was the same 18-month length of tenure afforded to Jackman in Newport. Ten defeats in 14 matches and the prospect of relegation to the Fédérale cost Baragnon.

The curious thing about this evolving PRO D2 landscape is how four of the five clubs who made changes – Bayonne along with European Cup final trio Biarritz, Brive and Colomiers – feel capable of being Top 14 teams. It seems ambitions to get back up to the first tier are influencing snap decisions.

This upheaval at these lower division clubs with a European pedigree is in stark contrast to Vannes’ build-it-slowly approach. Jean-Noel Spitzer is enjoying his 14th straight season in charge to make him and Bedford’s Mike Rayer the longest serving bosses anywhere on the European circuit.

Patient faith in the men in charge is a common denominator at clubs enjoying stability and regularly competing for trophies. Racing 92 are a good example, joint bosses Lauren Labit and Laurent Travers midway through their sixth season in charge in Paris.

But Leinster and Toulouse best illustrate the importance of clubs standing by their chosen ones. Leo Cullen was exposed by inexperience during his first season at the helm in Dublin, Leinster eliminated from Europe after just four pool rounds. Ugo Mola also struggled, Toulouse finishing a desultory 12th in the Top 14 in his second season.

Now both bosses are in their fourth seasons, their teams are playing exemplary attacking rugby and they are due to clash at the RDS on January 12 in the tie of Champions Cup round five.

Defending champions against pretenders to the throne. It’s a fixture that will highlight why offering job security to rugby bosses building for the long term can pay off handsomely in a climate where it’s becoming more frequent to rip it up and start again.

THE RATE OF 2018 CHANGE

PREMIERSHIP – Three changes (25%)

Paul Gustard for John Kingston (Harlequins)
Geordan Murphy for Matt O’Connor (Leicester)
Chris Boyd for Jim Mallinder (Northampton)

TOP14 – Four changes (28.5%)

Joe Worsley as interim for Rory Teague (Bordeaux)
Jono Gibbes for Patrice Colazzo (La Rochelle)
Heyneke Meyer for Greg Cooper (Stade Francais)
Patrice Colazzo for Fabien Galthie (Toulon)

PRO D2 – Five changes (31.2%)

Yannick Bru for Pierre Berbizier (Bayonne)
Jack Isaac for Gonzalo Quesada (Biarritz)
Jeremy Davidson for Nicolas Godignon (Brive)
Julien Sarraute for Olivier Baragnon (Colomiers)
Jamie Cudmore (new general manager position at Provence)

CHAMPIONSHIP – Three changes (25%)

Declan Kidney for Nick Kennedy (London Irish)
Neil Fowkes for Ian Costello (Nottingham)
Chris Stirling for James Lowes (Yorkshire)

WALES – Three changes (75%)
Allen Clarke for Steve Tandy (Ospreys)
John Mulvihill for Danny Wilson (Cardiff)
No one yet for Bernard Jackman (Dragons)
(A fourth switch is arranged for May 2018 as Wayne Pivac will leave Scarlets for Wales to be replaced by Brad Mooar)

IRELAND Two changes (50%)
Dan McFarland for Les Kiss/Jono Gibbes (Ulster)
Andy Friend for Kieran Keane (Connacht)
(It rises to three changes if you include Johann van Grann’s arrival at Munster in November 2017 for Rassie Erasmus)

SCOTLAND No changes

ITALY No changes

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 32 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search