Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The two 'parameters' Antoine Dupont's mask must meet

Antoine Dupont of Team France reacts during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between France and Italy at Parc Olympique on October 06, 2023 in Lyon, France. (Photo by Xavier Laine/Getty Images)

France have confirmed that injured captain Antoine Dupont has been trying out various forms of facial protection masks as he prepares for a likely return to the field against South Africa in the Rugby World Cup quarter-finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dupont became a doubt for the remainder of his country’s home Rugby World Cup after suffering the facial injury during a 96-0 win over Namibia on September 21.

However, his comeback is right on schedule and has been given the ‘greenlight’ to resume training by his surgeon and France medical staff.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match presser after final match

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones post-match presser after final match

“We will keep on working with him to make sure that he’s in the best position before the head coach makes his decisions (on the team selection). He had some contact with tackle pads with the fitness staff. Now he’s going to be back to normal training,” said France medical director Bruno Boussagol.

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
1
Draws
0
Wins
4
Average Points scored
23
27
First try wins
60%
Home team wins
40%

“The workload might be increased. I haven’t seen his individual programme. He will be at the staff disposal on the pitch.

“The key factor is apprehension. We need to remain close to Antoine and help him across the board for him to be in the best position to apply for selection. I think that the head coach will have a discussion with him and that it will be a joint reflection.”

There has been much conjecture in the media about whether Dupont will wear a face mask and France has confirmed that he has been trying out various forms of specialist head gear, but they are adamant that it must not compromise either his hearing or his vision.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The option of wearing a helmet was indeed discussed. We’re working on it. He has received and has tested this kind of protection equipment. There are two key points: his vision and hearing shouldn’t be affected. These two parameters need to be tested in real conditions.”

Facial protection is permitted under World Rugby ‘head gear’ regulations, once they meet strict specifications. Gear outside the ‘the crown, temple, forehead (sweatband area) and ear areas’ do not need to be impact tested but they must adhere to the following speicifications: “Areas outside designated zones of coverage do not have to meet impact requirements but must be of soft foam or leather and be less than or equal to 5mm in thickness. Where this overall thickness consists of padded material covered by fabric, 5 mm is the maximum measured thickness for the combination of the uncompressed padding and the fabric.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
B
Bob Marler 434 days ago

Third Criteria:

It must make him look “cool”.

So lame.

P
Poe 438 days ago

The man in the leather mask! It's got a good precedent for France.

B
Bob Marler 438 days ago

I reckon he should get an NFL helmet.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 42 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search