Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Wallabies are terrible and it has nothing to do with Folau

The Wallabies issues extend way past Israel Folau. (Photos/Gettys Images)

Michael Cheika’s Wallabies are continuing in the same direction as they were last year, after an opening 35-17 blowout loss at Ellis Park to what was described as a Springboks ‘B’ side but was laden with quality test match players.

ADVERTISEMENT

Right from the opening minute, the Springboks looked sharp, rushing up and pounding hapless Wallabies well beyond the gain line for seven phases before they turned it over. The intensity was too much for a side lacking fundamentals in so many areas.

The passage of play leading up to the Springboks’ first try perfectly illustrates Australia’s ineffectiveness with ball-in-hand, which often leads to shipping points against the run of play through errors or turnovers.

Bernard Foley is absolutely buried by Andre Esterhuizen for a gain line loss on a wrap-around play on first phase, killing a set-piece move from the lineout. As Kuridrani and Hooper try to secure the ruck from the side, the ball spills out forcing Nic White to scramble and run himself.

On the third phase, an inside ball from Sekope Kepu finds Folau Fainga’a who is driven sideways. The outside latcher, Lukhan Salakaia-Loto advances past Fainga’a to clean out the second tackler only to be knocked over by his own man Fainga’a, leaving the Wallabies without adequate protection. Kepu lazily tries to clean from the side but Francois Louw has already won possession, from which the Springboks spread wide and score 60-metres later.

This is part and parcel for this Wallabies side who have issues protecting and recycling the ball, with many of their pack too slow, taking bad angles and generally inaccurate at the breakdown. The scripted nature of their attack falls apart effortlessly with sloppy execution, at times from wayward passing and handling but just as much through poor breakdown work.

Video Spacer

It’s hard to say with any conviction that these forwards are the best players in their positions in Australia. If indeed they are, many are not up to the level required of Tier 1 international rugby to be successful. Under a new coach, the selections of Sekope Kepu, Folau Fainga’a, Izack Rodda, Rory Arnold and Lukhan Salakaia-Loto would be in serious jeopardy just based on their ability to do their job and get around the park efficiently at this level. Michael Hooper would miss out on starting due to not being the best in his position, his questionable role as an edge runner and obvious lineout deficiencies.

ADVERTISEMENT

This pack as currently constructed does not have the ability to dominate any facet of the game and will be eaten alive by their counterparts from England, Wales and Ireland at the World Cup while the All Blacks will feast on this piecemeal pack for another Bledisloe.

Nic White was the Wallabies’ best but even his impact was stifled by the sum of all parts. At times it felt as if the side could not play at the tempo he wanted to bring, and the quicker he played the worse things got. His kicking game provided the Wallabies some stability but they were outfoxed by both Springbok halves Herschel Jantjies and Elton Jantjies in that department.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B0OXE1yofuO/

Cheika is a passionate coach who is stubbornly loyal, often to the detriment of the Wallabies. His post-match sentiment again focused on refereeing decisions and not those of his players.

Dane Haylett-Petty putting a shoulder in at the ruck when he should be flanked on the blindside wing cost seven points. The possession leading to Jantjies’ second try was gifted to the Springboks by Bernard Foley pushing a pass just outside his own 22 that was intercepted. Izack Rodda’s poor defensive positioning allowed Pieter-Steph Du Toit to coast right by him and cost seven points a few phases later when Lood de Jager crashed over. Taniela Tupou cleaning out a player after the whistle lead to the third try. Foley throwing a pass to player in front of him and another player picking it up in an offside position lead to the fourth.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cheika spoke of being ‘happy with a lot of things’, ‘good defence’ and ‘picking apart the Springboks’ in what was nearly a 20-point loss. There seems to be no accountability for performance or the ability to identify poor performance in this current setup, just rhetoric about hope for tomorrow.

“There are a lot of great people in our team and a lot of great things happening behind the scenes that right now aren’t turning themselves into wins, but we will turn them into wins next year,” Michael Cheika said after the 2018 loss to England at Twickenham.

Well, tomorrow is here. It’s 2019 and it looks just as bleak for the Wallabies.

Springbok coach Rassie Erasmus after the win over the Wallabies:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 7 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search