Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Wallabies are the team Los Pumas know how to play, we'll see about the All Blacks

(Photo by Rodrigo Valle/Getty Images)

Altitude has always been an issue with rugby. The rarified air of the veldt and the length a ball can travel have been topics of discussion for ages.

ADVERTISEMENT

After so many years of Super Rugby and Tri Nations/Rugby Championship, teams have found ways to minimize the risk.

How will Argentina deal with being at the top of the Rugby Championship table, the heady height of number one, after two rounds is something that time will tell.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

When a week ago, we wrote about the mental stability of a Puma team that failed to manage their own pressures and expectations, no-one was expecting a recovery of the strength and standard of that seen in San Juan, when the Wallabies were totally obliterated and lost by a record margin.

With the four competing teams tied at five tournament points, Los Pumas 48-17 win placed them at the top of the table.

They are now in Sydney, resting ahead of their trip across the Tasman for round three and an All Black side that has remembered how good it feels to win.

“This win was, for the people, for everybody, important. But for us we need to take this game and set it as our standard, and be better for the next game,” were, give or take, Michael Cheika’s words in broken Spanish after the end of the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many said the performance was perfect; it wasn’t but it showed what this team can become. It can be argued that what Argentina did under the San Juan sun shows that the Wallabies are the team Los Pumas know how to play better.

Wins in 2014, 2018, two draws in 2020 and moments in other games in which Los Pumas were better, came to fruition on Saturday as everything they did turned to, a bit of a pun intended, gold.

By bringing the penalty-count down to nine throughout the game, it showed how much work had been done in the week leading up to the rematch. Both technical and mental.

The previous week in Mendoza, there were moments in which the home side showed how well they could play but it was not a complete game and imploding for 20 minutes, the game was lost.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

The Wallabies, certainly missing the leadership of Michael Hooper, were a shadow of the team they had been a week earlier. With a disappointing start that yielded 14 points in seven minutes, including the first of seven tries within the first sixty seconds, it was always going to be an uphill battle for Dave Rennie’s team.

Argentina were better in the scrum and rather than playing quick ball from the lineout, opted for mauling the Wallabies with incredible success. One maul in the second half was only stopped some 40 metres from where it had started.

“We were much better than last week; for fifty, fifty-five minutes we were still quite even in the score. Out attitude to continue playing, to try to be better in each action, made me very happy,” said Cheika who is back at home, using with the team his Randwick club field, and why not Coogee Beach across the street, before the short trip to New Zealand.

The hard work was noticeable and the ability to correct on-the-go showed how the new Puma staff has gelled and how they are reaching out to players, a mix of very experienced players and a younger generation that is coming through with great success.

Youth will be prominent in the squad to play New Zealand, mostly in the front row where 37-year old Agustín Creevy will pass on his No 16 jersey to 22-year old Ignacio Ruiz.

Also missing will be props Nahuel Tetaz Chaparro and Francisco Gómez Kodela, senior statesmen of the front row.

Thomas Gallo, only 23, will land in Christchurch for the first time, on the back of scoring a brace, his personal second, against Australia. A tour guide will probably be Pablo Matera, who after being a Super Rugby champion with the Crusaders, returns to the Garden City aiming to recreate his high standard there.

The hard test that the All Blacks always represent comes with the added pressure of a team that came back from a dark place to win with pragmatism against the Springboks.

Uncertain at the time of writing what will happen with the coaching staff, they certainly still have their backs against the wall and are very dangerous. They have always been and Los Pumas, with a huge input from Cheika, have beaten them only once in 2020.

Since the start of The Rugby Championship in 2012, Argentina would travel to New Zealand for round three. Never were they leading in a congested table.
Looking from the dizzy heights is great.

The team is on an upward trend, regardless of the outcome of the two-test series against the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
P
Peter 858 days ago

"With the four competing teams tied at five tournament points, Los Pumas 48-17 win placed them at the top of the table."

This is incorrect. All teams have one win, but ARG and AUS are sitting on 5 points due to bonus point wins, while SA and NZ are on 4 points.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 2 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 11 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search