Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Joe Schmidt verdict on Samu Kerevi's marred milestone

Wales v Australia - Autumn International - Principality Stadium

The Wallabies will battle to ensure Samu Kerevi’s tour isn’t over after the returning centre was left “distraught” by his red card for a dangerous tackle, the one sour note in their record-shattering win over Wales.

ADVERTISEMENT

As they celebrated their biggest-ever haul of points in a Cardiff Test with the 52-20 thumping, coach Joe Schmidt wasn’t hiding his disappointment that Kerevi’s landmark 50th cap in the centre should be marred by an undeserved punishment.

The likelihood is Kerevi could miss the Scotland Test next weekend at Murrayfield, which would be a significant blow for the Wallabies’ hopes of winning the third leg of their British Isles ‘grand slam’ quest.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The Japan-based 31-year-old was not expected to be available for the final match of the tour against Ireland in Dublin anyway, so his tour could be over unless Australian officials successfully fight his corner.

Kerevi was shown a yellow card, later upgraded to red, at the start of the second half after his tackle on Jac Morgan ended with his shoulder and forehead crashing into the Welsh flanker’s cheek.

Ruled as highly dangerous by the TMO, the decision to upgrade to the 20-minute red didn’t go down well with the Wallabies who felt there were mitigating circumstances, with Morgan having dipped into the collision late and effectively turning it into a ‘high’ tackle.

“We’re pretty disappointed with that decision around Samu, and we’ll have a look at that,” said Schmidt.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s pretty tough for Samu to be sent off in that tackle. He is distraught. Fiftieth game for the Wallabies and he gets a red card.

“He was trying to drop into the tackle, I thought. We were surprised that there was no mitigation, particularly because Jac played on, and there was no ping on his mouthguard, so it was then described as high danger.

“We will look at that closely, and potentially ask some questions through the right channels.”

Related

It could have been worse for the Wallabies later after new boy Joseph-Aukuso Suaalii also had a dubious hit on Morgan, but it went unpunished, with the cross-code star, who played just 17 minutes off the bench, now set to be starting in midfield next week in Kerevi’s absence.

Remarkably, the Australians, only narrowly 19-13 ahead when Kerevi was dismissed, were able to make light of being one man down for that entire third quarter as they ran in three of their eight tries, leaving Schmidt and captain-for-the-day Alan Alaalatoa declaring their pride in the team.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Very proud. It was really special. For us to connect like the way that we did today out there under pressure was massive for our group. And I think we’re going to go a long way from that,” said Alaalatoa.

HSBC SVNS Perth takes place on 24-26 January at HBF Park. Plan your ultimate rugby weekend in Western Australia with the help of flexible travel packages including tickets and accommodation. Buy Now or Find Out More.  

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
M
Mzilikazi 32 days ago

I admire Samu greatly, rate him highly. But that was a careless tackle, there was significant head contact. I would expect him to face suspension.

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 33 days ago

All rugby players know when the whistle blows “high degree of danger” is operational for 80+ minutes on every single movement, modality, and piece of the game. Rugby is by definition a collision and therefore unsafe sport. No one plays rugby to be safe; Jesus wept why does someone have to point this out? Why let the amateur administrators and their impotent, effete media pundits suicide the game?

R
Rob 33 days ago

High degree of danger doesn’t equal high degree of force just the potential for injury. This game isn’t reffed on outcomes….

J
J Marc 33 days ago

A few centimeters and the welch man was dead .

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search