Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Woodward recruit who was instrumental in Farrell red card case

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Clive Woodward has recalled that he was ridiculed when he first brought lawyer Richard Smith into the England set-up. It was 2002 when he first engaged the legal eagle and that recruitment is still paying dividends 21 years later as Smith was the lawyer who represented current skipper Owen Farrell at his three-and-a-half hour disciplinary hearing on Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Amid fears that Farrell could be set for a hefty ban for the red-carded high shot he put in on Wales’ Taine Basham last Saturday, the outcome was instead very different as Smith played his part in convincing the independent disciplinary hearing committee that the red card should be rescinded, freeing Farrell to play on with immediate effect.

Writing in Sportsmail, Woodward, who coached England to 2003 World Cup glory in Australia, gave an insight into Smith, recalling how he proved invaluable at the finals 20 years ago during the controversy that surrounded a managerial error in the pool win over Samoa.

Video Spacer

Kiwi pundits react to Owen Farrell’s red | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

Kiwi pundits react to Owen Farrell’s red | The Breakdown

“I was ridiculed for bringing Richard Smith KC into the England set-up in 2002,” began Woodward. “Many said there was no need and that his presence would be a waste of time and money for the RFU.

“But Richard proved his worth to me instantly on several fronts and was an excellent team player. Two decades on, he is still working brilliantly with English rugby.

Related

“The Farrell situation once again shows the importance of having a good lawyer in your team. I have no doubt that without Richard in his corner, Farrell would not have got off as lightly as he did.

“At the 2003 World Cup, we briefly fielded 16 players on the field against Samoa when Dan Luger came on the field by mistake. It was totally my fault and we could easily have been docked points.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Richard helped us get off with a fine and I’ll always owe him a debt of thanks for that given we went on to win the World Cup in Australia that year.

“Farrell also has a big thank you to give him… Richard is the only survivor from my 2003 team still working with England today. He is still proving his worth. Richard is undoubtedly superb at what he does.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
G
Grahame 460 days ago

It was never a red card in the first place, so justice has been seen to be done. Hallelujah.

f
finn 462 days ago

I hate clive woodward more every time he opens his mouth

B
Bob 462 days ago

It is good to see justice carried out through the proper channels by a panel weighing the evidence, without prejudice or favour. Fortunately the biased views of the court of public opinion is irrelevant - and long may it be so!

M
Mark 463 days ago

This judicial review and its subsequent ruling I think has fundamentally undermined not just the new bunker rule, but also the role of TMOs and refs more generally.
I think that this case will in the longer term be remembered for the law of unforseen consequence.
There must be a point where integrity and ethical values win out over legal chicanery, or the game will lose its soul.

s
steve 463 days ago

I dont know whats worse. The decision to overturn the red card ... or Sir Clive Woodward gloating that he was ultimately the reason Owen Farrell got let off. A sad day for rugby and any parent concerned about player safety.

C
CT 463 days ago

Sad that a lawyer has to get involved Farrell is clearly a T-Rex 🦖

D
David 463 days ago

well maybe his lawyer got him confussed with will farrell who is an actual actor. its a stupid decison hope someone gives him the same treatment and gets away with it

C
CRZ38L 463 days ago

Cheats, plain and simple.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search