Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Woodward recruit who was instrumental in Farrell red card case

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Clive Woodward has recalled that he was ridiculed when he first brought lawyer Richard Smith into the England set-up. It was 2002 when he first engaged the legal eagle and that recruitment is still paying dividends 21 years later as Smith was the lawyer who represented current skipper Owen Farrell at his three-and-a-half hour disciplinary hearing on Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Amid fears that Farrell could be set for a hefty ban for the red-carded high shot he put in on Wales’ Taine Basham last Saturday, the outcome was instead very different as Smith played his part in convincing the independent disciplinary hearing committee that the red card should be rescinded, freeing Farrell to play on with immediate effect.

Writing in Sportsmail, Woodward, who coached England to 2003 World Cup glory in Australia, gave an insight into Smith, recalling how he proved invaluable at the finals 20 years ago during the controversy that surrounded a managerial error in the pool win over Samoa.

Video Spacer

Kiwi pundits react to Owen Farrell’s red | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

Kiwi pundits react to Owen Farrell’s red | The Breakdown

“I was ridiculed for bringing Richard Smith KC into the England set-up in 2002,” began Woodward. “Many said there was no need and that his presence would be a waste of time and money for the RFU.

“But Richard proved his worth to me instantly on several fronts and was an excellent team player. Two decades on, he is still working brilliantly with English rugby.

Related

“The Farrell situation once again shows the importance of having a good lawyer in your team. I have no doubt that without Richard in his corner, Farrell would not have got off as lightly as he did.

“At the 2003 World Cup, we briefly fielded 16 players on the field against Samoa when Dan Luger came on the field by mistake. It was totally my fault and we could easily have been docked points.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Richard helped us get off with a fine and I’ll always owe him a debt of thanks for that given we went on to win the World Cup in Australia that year.

“Farrell also has a big thank you to give him… Richard is the only survivor from my 2003 team still working with England today. He is still proving his worth. Richard is undoubtedly superb at what he does.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
G
Grahame 491 days ago

It was never a red card in the first place, so justice has been seen to be done. Hallelujah.

f
finn 493 days ago

I hate clive woodward more every time he opens his mouth

B
Bob 493 days ago

It is good to see justice carried out through the proper channels by a panel weighing the evidence, without prejudice or favour. Fortunately the biased views of the court of public opinion is irrelevant - and long may it be so!

M
Mark 493 days ago

This judicial review and its subsequent ruling I think has fundamentally undermined not just the new bunker rule, but also the role of TMOs and refs more generally.
I think that this case will in the longer term be remembered for the law of unforseen consequence.
There must be a point where integrity and ethical values win out over legal chicanery, or the game will lose its soul.

s
steve 493 days ago

I dont know whats worse. The decision to overturn the red card ... or Sir Clive Woodward gloating that he was ultimately the reason Owen Farrell got let off. A sad day for rugby and any parent concerned about player safety.

C
CT 493 days ago

Sad that a lawyer has to get involved Farrell is clearly a T-Rex 🦖

D
David 493 days ago

well maybe his lawyer got him confussed with will farrell who is an actual actor. its a stupid decison hope someone gives him the same treatment and gets away with it

C
CRZ38L 493 days ago

Cheats, plain and simple.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search