Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Their skill execution was absolutely atrocious': Irish pundits pick apart England's loss

Elliot Daly of England passes the ball to George Furbank (not pictured), who goes onto to score the first try for England, during the Guinness Six Nations 2024 match between Scotland and England at BT Murrayfield Stadium on February 24, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Scotland’s golden run over England continued with a fourth consecutive Calcutta Cup win at Murrayfield as Steve Borthwick’s side showcased a litany of errors.

ADVERTISEMENT

A hat-trick to star winger Duhan van der Merwe powered Scotland to a 30-21 victory as the home side made the visitors pay for poor execution.

Despite coming into the game with wins over Italy and Wales, there were still concerns over the state of the England side given the unconvincing form that Borthwick’s side were showing.

Irish TV pundits dissected the performance on Virgin Media Sport which showed England were who everyone thought they were.

“They’re just… if we were going to show you an England errors package, we’d be here for half an hour,” Matt Williams told the Virgin Media Sport panel.

“They just made error after error. And you think, the three Van der Merwe tries were from English errors.

“The error off the scrum, the falcon off the head of [George] Furbank, then an English lineout that was lost that led to the possession for the cross-field kick for his third try.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That is just a small picture of the number of errors they made. They dropped restarts, they dropped lineouts, they had Scotland beaten at the scrum and they kept engaging too early. There were four free kicks for early engagement.

“The ill discipline was just ridiculous. The number of passes that just went nowhere, thrown into touch.”

Ex-Ireland international Rob Kearney offered a glass-half full view of England, praising their attempt at playing with more ambition but lambasted their ability to do so.

He said it was the “best” rugby that England have tried to play in a while but absolutely failed at trying to implement it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is going to sound a bit off the wall, but that’s the best England have tried to play,” the former fullback said.

“The ambition that they showed, the running lines, the phase play, it was really, really good tonight. The best I’ve seen from them in a long time.

“Their skill execution was absolutely atrocious. That’s the reason they lost the game. The amount of times they turned the ball over and handed the ball back to Scotland was atrocious.

“It’s pass handling. All these players can pass a ball, they can catch a ball. It’s something that they can get right. That’s why I’m saying I’m encouraged by the ambition.

Related

Former Ulster outside back Andrew Trimble said it was a case of “beware of what you wish for” from England.

The grass isn’t always greener if you can’t water the lawn. Based on the Calcutta Cup loss, it appears that England can’t back up intent with ability and therefore should stop trying.

“It’s a strangle angle but I 100 per cent see what you mean, they tried, they had the intention of playing more rugby,” Trimble said.

“But be careful what you wish for. Everybody, everywhere has been saying this English side is capable of playing more rugby.

“Well maybe they’ve proved tonight they are not capable. When they are at their best, when they are ahead, they put you under pressure through the kicking game, defence. Make you chase the game.

“Scotland did to them what they’ve been doing to everyone for the last year. Maybe us purists should stop trying to get some rugby out of them.”

Related

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

7 Comments
A
Alex 393 days ago

Why did we need Ben Smith to write this? I thought this guy did analysis? Kind of thing you read on any standard news site.

P
Patrick 394 days ago

Can’t deny how poor england have been and continue to be and there needs to be a serious revamp at who deserves to play rather than picking someone because of who they are

T
Tom 394 days ago

These players are capable of running, passing, catching. They've been playing rugby since they were little kids. To imply that the players are incapable of playing rugby is ridiculous especially when. Trimble then claims that Northampton are better than England. Have you seen Northampton play? Yes, they're full of English players who are running, passing and catching and some of them are in this England team! The problem is, this is not the environment for them to blossom. If you brought in Gregor Townsend, Andy Farrell, Stuart Lancaster or Scott Robertson do you think we'd see such a lack of cohesion in attack and so many basic errors? The players aren't the issue. We've got a heavily stats based coaching team who have built their club successes on kicking and mauling now asking their players to do something totally alien.

Scotland have been successful because Gregor Townsend has a strong personality and their players understand what he wants from them. They're going to throw caution to the wind, leave everything on the pitch and if they make mistakes with the right intent they will be supported. England don't seem to have a clue what they want to do.

C
Chris 394 days ago

Is it any wonder the Skills have deterioted when you realise that Kevin Sinfield is in charge of Skills?
Add to that the sterile attack borne from Richard Wigglesworth and the fact that we are copying another countries defence it starts to make you think that the coaching appointments are flawed. Time for Borthwick to go and being in someone who can revolutionise England's game not just try to replicate a minor success at club rugby?

R
Red and White Dynamight 394 days ago

England were, are, very poor. As they were at the RWC and yet could have easily contested another Final. They’ll get minced by Ireland.

A
Alexander 394 days ago

Unfortunately, I have to agree. I have no idea how we've been saying this for the past 5 years, but here we are: we're still waiting for this England team to spark. Yes, the talent is spread amongst a number of clubs, but still, at some stage something surely has to click.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 25 minutes ago
'Ulster, though no one wants to admit it, isn't much more than a development province right now.'

“I’d love to know the relevant numbers of who comes into professionalism from a club, say as an adult, versus early means like say pathway programmes “


Not sure where you would get that information, JW. But your question piqued my interest, and I looked at the background of some Ulster players. If you are interested/have the time, look at the Wiki site for Ulster rugby, and scroll down to the current squad, where you can then click on the individual players, and often there is good info. on their pathway to Ulster squad.


Not many come in from the AIL teams directly. Robert Baloucoune came from Enniskillen into the Ulster setup, but that was after he played Sevens for Ireland. Big standout missed in his school years is Stuart McCloskey, who never played for an age group team, and it was only after he showed good form playing for AIL team Dungannon, that he was eventually added late to Ulster Academy.


“I’m just thinking ahead. You know Ireland is going to come into the same predicament Aus is at where that next group of youngsters waiting to come into programmes get picked off by the French”


That is not happening with top young players in Ireland. I can’t think of a single example of one that has gone to a French club, or to any other country. But as you say, it could happen in the future.


What has happened to a limited extent is established Irish players moving offshore, but they are few. Jonathan Sexton had a spell with Racing in France…not very successful. Simon Zebo also went over to Racing. Trevor Brennan went to Toulouse, stayed there too, with his sons now playing in France, one at Toulouse, one at Toulon. And more recently the two tens, Joey Carbery to Bordueax, and Ben Healy to Edinburgh.


“I see they’ve near completed a double round robin worth of games, does that mean theres not much left in their season?”


The season finishes around mid April. Schools finish on St Patrick’s Day, 17 th Match. When I lived in Ireland, we had a few Sevens tournaments post season. But never as big a thing as in the Scottish Borders, where the short game was “invented”.

45 Go to comments
P
Poorfour 1 hour ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 2025 Lions' selection: An idiot's guide 2025 Lions' selection: An idiot's guide
Search