Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

There is a growing sense of parity among the six or so best test sides

(Photos by Getty Images)

Reservations around the All Blacks under Ian Foster still exist, despite an overall successful season so far this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The performances have at times been brilliant when the opposition played right into their hands, as the Wallabies and Wales did.

However, a tactically awful game against the Springboks in Townsville was the first to show New Zealand’s flaws and keep doubts in check.

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi speaks of his side’s resolve

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi speaks of his side’s resolve

The rematch a week later was a much better contest, yet the All Blacks buckled with the game essentially in the bag to give the Springboks one last chance to take the win.

A lacklustre performance from the All Blacks’ ‘B’ side against Italy on the weekend furthered the concerns lingering around about where this squad is after the ‘A’ team obliterated a depleted Welsh side in Cardiff the week beforehand.

There were quality players on that field in Rome that made uncharacteristically basic errors that they just don’t when playing for the Chiefs or Crusaders in Super Rugby.

For that reason, questions get put on the coaching staff as the public expects more of such talent.

ADVERTISEMENT

After an underwhelming 2020 season, the All Blacks have plenty to do to answer those questions, but the performances like those against Italy and the Springboks leave those queries unanswered.

The public knows they are a good side, but that goes with the territory with the All Blacks. What they want to see are dominant victories against quality opposition to develop full belief that this squad is a great one.

These doubts exist in spite of the fact the All Blacks unassumingly sit with a win-loss record of 12-1 on the year, which is the best record of any test side in the 2021 calendar year.

Against only tier one competition, their 8-1 record is better than that of the Springboks (6-4), Scotland (4-2), the Wallabies (6-5), France (5-4), Ireland (3-2) and Wales (4-4-1) similarly against tier one.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks have already proven they are not a dominant nor historically great side this year, despite being put on a pedestal as a mythical beast of the game.

Just scraping by against a stout yet seriously undermanned Welsh outfit is further proof that South Africa are a determined, but fortuitous side, playing a 50-50 game plan that keeps games close but isn’t reliable.

As we have seen, they will invariably swallow some losses along the way and they almost took another in Cardiff after failing to take the lead for 70-odd minutes in an unconvincing display.

They won’t get embarrassed on the scoreboard, but cannot dominate many teams and put them away by 20 consistently, if at all. Many of their wins could have fallen the other way, just like their losses.

That the Springboks are not a great side does not mean the All Blacks are automatically one either, despite a better record against tier one teams this year.

You’d be hard pressed to find many in New Zealand who believe this 2021 All Blacks side is great one, yet. The trumpets are not being blown for them the same way as the vuvuzelas are for the Springboks in South Africa.

Most would see New Zealand’s upcoming tests against Ireland and France as both losable fixtures or, at the very least, uncertain outcomes as opposed to the inevitability of the last two weeks.

The All Blacks-France test in Paris has drawn most of the excitement and anticipation, yet it is Ireland under Andy Farrell that pose an equally difficult challenge, and the fact that they are flying under the radar should put Foster’s team on notice.

For all the hype surrounding France’s revival, centred around a young core of stars such as Antoine Dupont and Romain Ntamack, they are yet to win any silverware in this era. It would seem France are still France that blow hot and cold.

Despite a fast start to the Six Nations last year, they flamed out at Murrayfield and conceded the title to England. England then claimed the Autumn Nations Cup in November when France sent what was basically a ‘C’ team to the final.

To start Andy Farrell’s era, Ireland started that 2020 Six Nations campaign 2-0 and were still a chance to claim the title heading into the final round when the tournament restarted, needing a big win over Les Bleus and came up short 35-27.

This year, both sides finished second and third once again, with France squeezing a tight 15-13 win over the Irish at home.

On the basis of their competitiveness in those fixtures and competitions, Ireland are as much of a chance as France to hand the All Blacks a loss this week, and recent history is in their favour.

The Irish will likely once again rise to try and ambush the All Blacks in Dublin without the pressure of expectation.

New Zealand’s last visit there was a famous loss in 2018, and they had a point to prove in 2016 after the famous defeat in Chicago. Three years before that, the All Blacks escaped defeat with Ryan Crotty’s last-ditch try and Aaron Cruden’s clutch sideline kick.

It has not been easy in the slightest for the All Blacks playing Ireland in Dublin, and, although they haven’t won headlines, Farrell’s side possess an edge similar to that of their coach.

They have not suffered a heavy defeat since their World Cup quarterfinal at the hands of the All Blacks two years ago, and they aren’t likely to go down as they did that night in Tokyo.

Scotland’s win over the Wallabies further adds credibility to the claim that we have five-to-six teams in test rugby that can all beat each other on the day, with no clear-cut dominant team. Home advantage counts for a lot between them. Ireland and France can further that idea by knocking the All Blacks’ 2021 win record down a few percentage points.

Perhaps we are entering a golden era of test rugby heading into the 2023 World Cup given there is parity at the top in 2021 and matches depend on the finest of margins.

The lack of cross-hemisphere clashes have clouded this possibility, but November’s Autumn Nations Series may shine a light on it.

The All Blacks aren’t dominant like they used to be, while the Springboks never were as dominant as they were made out to be.

The Wallabies are back, Scotland are legitimate contenders, as are Ireland and France, and Wales – as Six Nations champions but with a decimated pack – pushed the Springboks to the brink with far fewer resources at their disposal.

England aren’t even in the conversation yet after a horror Six Nations, but you can’t discount them turning things around with the might of the RFU behind them. They have the chance to prove themselves against Australia and South Africa this month.

If the All Blacks want to set a marker down as the leader of the pack, then wins over the next two weeks are a must to finish the year 10-1 against tier one nations. Doing so may finally start build some credit for Foster.

Failing in either clash will ensure that reservations about him and his team will persist in 2022.

Failing in both will categorically show there are no clear-cut favourites for 2023.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
a
andre 1102 days ago

I guess after the recent 30-15 win of SA over the Scotts should make this article look even more baseless! The top of the Top Tier nations, like SA , win the big games, without excuses. Let England , Wales or Scotland win big competitions 3 times and remain in top 4 world rankings, consistently , before trying to elevate them with your pen !

G
Gra 1108 days ago

Ben, you’re losing credibility with articles like this mate. @RugbyPass, you’re better than this. Just saying…

S
Shaune 1108 days ago

Your standards must be very high for a side to be a great side, or a dominant side. This article is baseless. Boks win world cup convincingly beating mighty England who are brilliant. Then Boks did not play for nearly 2 years. Played 1 game against Georgia. Then beat the British Lions, who are a great side, something which wallabies last 2 tours and NZ have failed to do. SA then beat NZ away from home (second time, and have drawn in NZ over the last 3 years), after struggling against AUS at home, who are building and tough at 🏠. Show me a team that competes with NZ in NZ and actually beats them in NZ. NZ is now also in trouble? NZ has had a great year. SA had as many players missing against Wales. Game breaking players DuToit (world player of the year), King Kolbe, Syman, Malherbe, Faf, Nkosi. All starting players. So I suggest giving some credit to wales who are a good side, but SA did not fire 🔥 and yet pulled a win away from home. Good sides win when they are not meant to. England and all teams struggle to beat Wales at home.
SA World no 1 or 2 consistently. Let's tone down the negativity and biased writing mate.

A
Anti-BenSmith Page 1108 days ago

You're insufferable "Ben Smith"
It's very excruciating reading any article written by you
You offer no valuable analysis of any sorts
Just pure unguided bias and worthless takes
Can you actually do everyone a favor and learn how to offer proper analysis??

C
Chris 1109 days ago

The most passive aggressive article of all time. It starts off all innocent and slowly turns into a toxic poc. Springboks 6-4 , which includes beating the British and Irish lions. Something his all mighty all conquering AB’s could not do. They did it despite 12 players getting Covid. Then goes on how the springboks struggled against wales. Ummm, ok buddy, they came off a big loss they were always going to be a different beast. Anyways this writer’s arrogance does not surprise me anymore.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search