Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'There is going to be some questions': Why Tuivasa-Sheck snub hurts the Blues' brand

Credit: Derek Morrison / www.photosport.nz

Former Queensland State of Origin coach and Manly Sea Eagles CEO Sir Graham Lowe was left shocked that Roger Tuivasa-Sheck was omitted from the Blues team to play the Crusaders.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues selected Harry Plummer in the No 12 jersey to face the Crusaders and used Bryce Heem and AJ Lam as the reserve backs off the bench in the 15-3 loss.

The league convert was capped by the All Blacks in 2022 but the writing seems to be on the wall after the selection snub.

Lowe had a hunch that the omission might be due to Tuivasa-Sheck announcing he will return to the NRL with the New Zealand Warriors.

“I’ve tried to take a balanced view of it but I can’t believe he couldn’t make a 23-man Blues side,” Lowe told D’Arcy Waldegrave’s Newstalk ZB show.

“I think that if you ask any of the Blues players, they would totally agree.

“I see the other side of the coin where Roger has already said he’s coming back to the Warriors, he wants to make a change.

“A little bit of the thinking on their part will be why not let him move on now or not include him and let us get prepared for next year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite signing with the Warriors for a return in 2024, Tuivasa-Sheck’s goal is to make the Rugby World Cup with the All Blacks.

Not being picked for the Blues will harm those chances but Lowe said that Tuivasa-Sheck’s reputation remains in tact and it is the Blues who are doing damage to their brand.

“I don’t think this damages Roger’s brand whatsoever,” Lowe explained.

“I think this has an impact on the Blues brand if he can’t make the Blues side and they can’t aim up, well there is going to be some questions asked, surely.

“Obviously it is a big transition in any sport when you change one code to another, it’s not an easy thing.

ADVERTISEMENT

“From what I’ve seen Roger has always looked a good player and hasn’t looked out of place in the backline, whether it be for the All Blacks or for the Blues.

“There might be little niches in the game that they might not think he is as good as others, I’m not sure, but he’s a class player.

“There are very few players that play for any organisation that have class, and Roger’s got class, doesn’t matter what jersey he is wearing.

“Many good judges of rugby would say he’s good enough to be in the All Blacks at the end of the year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
f
frandinand 556 days ago

And many good judges of rugby would say that he is not competent enough to be an AB at number 12.
And if Lowe thinks that the Blues coaching team are not selecting him out of spite because he is leaving next year he is an idiot. The Blues coaching team will be selecting what they think is their best team. They are trying to win a competition.
RTS was always leaving the Blues at the end of 2023 whether it be to union or league would make no difference to the Blues coaches.
Lowe's comments are those of a league coach and are therefore suspect because of his bias and general lack of intelligence.

R
Roger 557 days ago

Graham Lowe stick to league mate. Your comments are not helpful to RTS and /or Rugby.

G
Greg 557 days ago

Time to question whoever at the Blues thought RTS was a good investment. Union is so specialised it should have been obvious he was never going to cut it at the top level: not enough defensive presence for the mid-field, not fast enough for the wing, not a good enough kicker or reader of the game for five eighth or fullback. All of which also indicates he doesn't warrant a place on the bench either.

A
Andrew 557 days ago

Like hed know anything about Rugby? RTS was an experiment. For better or worse be chose the Blues (major mistake) his coaches thought hed be a midfielder (delusional) and now its clear the experiment in trying to restore him to rugby was like with Benjie, an dxpensive mistake. He simpy isnt better than the alternatives, however we and he may have wished otherwise.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Five legends to be inducted into World Rugby Hall of Fame Five legends to be inducted into World Rugby Hall of Fame
Search