Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'There’s more to it': Former All Black captain doubtful of eligibility rule change

Head coach Todd Blackadder of Toshiba Brave Lupus is seen prior to the Japan Rugby League One match between Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo and Saitama Panasonic Wild Knights at Prince Chichibu Memorial Ground on April 21, 2023 in Tokyo, Japan. (Photo by Koki Nagahama/Getty Images)

Former All Black captain and current Toshiba Brave Lupus head coach Todd Blackadder does not think NZR will change the eligibility rules for All Black selection anytime soon.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Japan-based coach offers a unique perspective with his club having received the services of two new All Blacks, Shannon Frizell and Richie Mo’unga, while another Seta Tamanivalu is a key weapon for the club.

The downstream ramifications of the selection change was of concern to the former Crusader, with all levels of rugby in New Zealand set to be impacted.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I don’t think it will happen for a while,” Blackadder told 1News in an interiew.

“It’s really going to come down to governance models. There’s so much that has to be unpicked.”

A change in All Blacks selection eligibility would open up different pathways to becoming an All Black, with younger players potentially jetting offshore early for riches knowing that they can chase the black jersey from elsewhere.

It could have large impacts for the development systems in New Zealand losing young players and therefore losing control over their development and playing identity.

“It’s not so much about the selection policy – it will have a massive impact on grass roots rugby, it will have a massive impact on school rugby and it will have a massive impact on provincial rugby, plus the All Blacks of course.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The other concern to Blackadder was how overseas clubs manage the players through a season and through injuries.

The All Blacks will have little oversight or knowledge of that and not have the full picture when it comes to selections.

“There’s also the management of players to consider – there’s more to it than ‘we just want the ability to pick guys from overseas’,” he said.

“When you’re playing around the world… those clubs may not always be willing to release those players and if they were willing to then they would probably be on reduced contracts.”

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
S
Silk 353 days ago

When they changed the ellibility rules in SA rugby, we were very fearful for the same reasons that NZ are now.
It has actually had the opposite effect.
With most Boks playing at overseas clubs, young talent had to be introduced into the provincial franchise teams. It has unearthed a wealth if talent. Players who would have been kept out of the franchise teams by players like Pollard, Kolbe, Etsebeth etc, now had an opportunity to prove their worth. Moodie, Arendse, etc would most likely never been spotted.
We have in SA so many brilliant youngsters coming through that you could pick 2 or 3 Bok teams of near equal strength.
Also, your incumbent Bok players are pushed to be at their best by the upcoming young stars. I.e. Pollard with Libbock pushing him.
The secret is a solid strong rugby development system. As much as everyone thinks Rassie is in charge of the Bok team, he is not. He is director of SA rugby and has developed a magnificent rugby system from u/16 schools, yo u/20, varsity rugby through to the Boks.
Can something like this work in NZ?

j
johnz 354 days ago

Most of these discussions around overseas All Blacks eligibility are largely pointless. It’s highly unlikely NZR would consider a black and white solution like Blackadder alludes to, it would far more likely be a very limited dispensation for a small number of players who had already earnt their stripes. It’s been reported NZR came very close to making a dispensation for Beauden Barret to be eligible from overseas. So there are already those inside the secretive offices of NZR pushing for change, and it seems inevitable eventually. But it would be very controlled one would expect, so the fearmongering of a mass exodus is being way overdone.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh
Search