Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'There's still a lot of trophies in the cabinet': Glass half full on All Blacks' year

(Photo by Dan Peled / www.photosport.nz)

The All Blacks disappointing end to the 2021 season after 15 tests has added pressure on the side after their disrupted 2020 season also ended in unconvincing fashion with three wins from six tests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ian Foster’s side locked up the Bledisloe Cup with a 3-nil sweep over Australia before clinching The Rugby Championship with a round to spare, but the three test losses to South Africa, Ireland and France brought the side back to Earth.

It was the first All Blacks side to lose three tests in a calendar year since 2009. Evaluating what we’ve seen from the side since 2019, former All Black James Parsons said New Zealand have improved in certain areas since the last World Cup.

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

“I certainly think they have made improvements, ” Parsons explained on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod.

“They’ve had the blueprint, when they’ve had that front foot ball and been really physical at the breakdown, we’ve seen how electric their attack can be.

“For the most part, except for the last two weeks, their defensive system has been really strong. They’ve really focused on that low tackler, and getting in and winning those breakdown turnovers.

“That’s becoming such a key part of the game, the ability to turn that ball over. So for the most part I think their game has evolved.”

Parsons highlighted the change of approach against France to play through the forwards as one example of how the All Blacks have evolved their game since 2019, with their regular expansive attacking game being widely known these days.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think we had that pick-and-go mindset, I think that has been a big shift,” Parsons said of one key change the All Blacks had made.

“Obviously, we were quite the expansive team, we had three forwards and a clear way of attack. As you’ve alluded too, teams have got used to that and they believe that line speed pressure can put us under pressure.

“I think there has been evolution in our game, but I think it is important to know as well, if there is ever a time to have back-to-back losses, I think the last time was 2009 which was two years out from the 2011 World Cup, and we know how successful that was.

“I think there are so many lessons and positives to take out of this situation, call me an optimistic bloke, but I think it sets us up.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If you look at the Springboks before the 2019 World Cup, people were probably saying the same things. They really found their way, galvanised as a group and lead the charge into 2019.

“I’m hoping to see the same from us.”

Parsons said despite a side like Ireland being in fantastic form with all the right ingredients, at the end of the day everyone will be judged on the World Cup. Ireland’s form will be redundant if they can’t peak in two years time.

On the positive side, he pointed to the trophy cabinet which the All Blacks managed to fill with the Bledisloe cup, the Rugby Championship title and the Freedom Cup despite conceding the Dave Gallaher Trophy to France.

“If you look it on face value on form, the Irish are playing some great footy and their skillset in attack, Tadhg Furlong’s making line breaks, offloading to his mate Porter, he did it again on the weekend.

“They are creating depth as well. Their forwards, with the combination of experienced players in Sexton and Murray in and around that group, and guys like Jamison Gibson-Park adding a bit of flair, James Lowe and Bundee Aki, they are in a really good spot.

“But it’s about finding the form they are in now and peaking for the World Cup. Because that’s what everyone will be judged on.

“At the end of the day with the All Blacks, there’s still a lot of trophies in the cabinet. Ok, we are missing two, but outside of that we aren’t missing any others.”

Crusaders halfback Bryn Hall also agreed, adding he would rather lose now and learn from it in order to rectify things for a successful World Cup campaign in 2023.

“Another example around Ireland, they felt like they were peaking two years out from a World Cup,” Hall said.

“We are so used to the excellence of the All Blacks winning every year but for me personally, I’d rather take the losses right now and be in a position to take the learnings and be able to adapt our game two years out and have the end result of winning the 2023 World Cup.

“Due to having a tough end of year tour that we had this year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search