Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘These men have never come up against forwards that are 150kgs’

(Photo by World Rugby via Getty Images)

This wasn’t supposed to be how it turned out for New Zealand at the Junior World Championship, Clark Laidlaw’s U20s left nursing a painful 14-35 game two defeat to France that has left them in need of a favor elsewhere next Tuesday if they are to ultimately make the semi-finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Baby Blacks are the competition’s most titled team, winning six of its dozen editions. However, quite a leap of faith is now required to believe that this class of 2023 can somehow still get out of their pool stage jail and make the play-offs.

Having struggled in the opening half versus Wales last Saturday, trailing 5-19 before hitting back to win 27-26, the expectation was that a lesson would have been learned about slow starts.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

It wasn’t, as New Zealand were behind 0-21 at the break on Thursday in Paarl and it was only after the concession of the bonus point fourth try to the French that they finally raised a gallop.

They scored two converted tries to halve the 28-point margin, but they conceded soon after to quickly quash the notion that a comeback was on and it left head coach Laidlaw ruminating about the size differential between the two packs.

“Ultimately it is a really disappointing day and loads of lessons,” he told RugbyPass in the aftermath, the rain cascading down as he spoke outside the marquee that was the New Zealand dressing room. “I said last week we were here to learn.

“We want to win, let’s never forget that, but these men have never come up against forwards that are 150kgs and two or three of them all in the same forward pack, so we have got to learn how we deal with that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I thought our scrum was outstanding. That was a real big plus that we can scrum, but we have got maul, we have got to (be better at the) breakdown; we have got to get those parts right too.

“They [France] scored the tries and their weight and their physicality when they got in the 22 caused us problems. It was only a couple of times defensively where we didn’t get them on the ground and they were able to get massive gainline and quick ball. That is their game and I guess the scoreline is always a reflection really.”

Particularly wounding was New Zealand’s failure to score in the first half. “It was disappointing to go three tries down. It’s fine margins. At 7-0, we had a couple of opportunities in the 22 that we didn’t take. We had chances near half-time – we didn’t take one of those and that can be the difference.

“You saw in the second half when we got the ball we were able to put it in space and we caused them a lot of problems. They were really short in defence, they went down taking cramp a lot, so maybe the conditions didn’t play into our favour, but we were disappointed with that first half.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There was lots of endeavour. I thought for large parts we defended really well and when we could get the ball to space I thought we looked dangerous, but ultimately in conditions like this against a team with a huge forward pack, the sort of weight at times wore us down and we couldn’t get the field position or the territory with the possession.

“In that first half we were pinned in our own third, so it was a really mixed performance. I thought France first half were pretty clinical and put us under a lot of pressure through their forward play and those big bodies.”

New Zealand will complete their pool with a match versus Rob Penney’s winless Japan. They will be expected to win with a bonus and shift their points total to 10, which would be good enough for second place in their pool behind France, but with just one best runner-up progressing to the semi-finals along with the three pool winners, they would need a major favour elsewhere to secure their progress.

“It’s not in our hands now,” accepted Laidlaw. “We will dust ourselves off and get a look at the results around the competition… If it becomes an option and points difference is still there, then we have got to go after it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

27 Comments
P
Pecos 539 days ago

Comments extrapolating this tourney to adult test matches are stupid. This is an annual comp for kids, some who are bigger & more developed than others. Very hit & miss though France has won the last two tourneys (pre covid last played in 2019?) by sending forwards monsters. So what imo? Tests on the other hand are the real deal. No comparison.

F
Ferell 540 days ago

This is exactly
what the French plan to do in the world cup with the All Blacks.....

P
Paul 540 days ago

Something that wasn't pointed out : almost all of the baby blues use to play in the Top 14 agaisnt huge players with a lot of physicality.

J
Jeremy 540 days ago

The conditions also played their part and have really suited the bigger teams too.

D
Driss 540 days ago

The nz rugby problems began when Mark Robinson has been appointed like president : he choised foster and again rep pointed in 2022, U20 not considered, local rugby…
Now end of year , mark Robinson and the panel must go.
A guy with experience must be the NZRU president.

p
peter 540 days ago

And to think he will be the next Hurricanes coach

R
Richard 540 days ago

Some simple lessons on defence I would have thought. Take big men around their ankles for a starter! Several times they needed to spread the ball faster and further and our kicking needed to be a bit smarter - some good lessons overall however.

A
Andrew 541 days ago

"We are here to learn" This is what sides coming to NZ used to say after yet another defeat to the ABs. Now an NZ coach is saying it....

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search