Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'They just let the team down': Highlanders boss Tony Brown reveals 'disappointing' reason behind All Black star's omission

(Photo by Dianne Manson/Getty Images)

Highlanders head coach Tony Brown says he and the franchise are a whole are “disappointed” to have dropped one-test All Blacks pivot Josh Ioane and five other players from this week’s side to face the Crusaders due to a breach of the team’s code.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ioane was a notable omission from the Highlanders team announcement on Wednesday as he was listed as unavailable despite not being injured.

So too were Marino Mikaele-Tu’u, Patelesio Tomkinson, Daniel Lienert-Brown, Teariki Ben-Nicholas and Sione Misiloi, but Brown has cleared up why the sextet of players have been deemed unavailable for this weekend’s South Island derby.

Video Spacer

All Blacks reveal who their toughest opponents were

Video Spacer

All Blacks reveal who their toughest opponents were

“There’s six guys who are unavailable through letting the team down around their standards; broke the code that we live by and it’s all around their professional habits,” he said.

“They just let the team down, the leaders and the whole organisation so they won’t be available for selection.

“They have to earn their right to get selected again so we’ll see how they go for the rest of the week at training and see how they go next week.”

Brown didn’t explain why exactly the players were stood down, but he said the organisation and the players themselves have moved on swiftly in preparation of what will be a tough encounter against the reigning Super Rugby Aotearoa champions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m disappointed, same as the whole organisation. They’re always sorry. We’ve moved on, they’ve moved on and we look forward to the Crusaders now.”

Ioane was a standout from fullback in last week’s 30-19 defeat to the Hurricanes, while Mikaele-Tu’u and Tomkinson also started that match from No 8 and second-five, respectively.

The trio have all been replaced in the match day side by Kazuki Himeno, Thomas Umaga-Jensen and Scott Gregory, and Brown said it was a good opportunity for those players to prove their worth in what will be their first starts of the season.

“It’s an opportunity,” he said. “Rugby’s all about opportunity and if these guys perform well, then we’ve got quite a good chance to go out there and play good footy and win the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

This is the second time in the space of a year the Highlanders have had players who have found themselves in hot water due to off-field antics.

Seven of their players were involved in a boozy incident in Queenstown while partying at an apartment complex that resulted in several complaints regarding the group’s behaviour and noise levels last July.

An associate of the group, who is not part of the Highlanders’ playing squad, was subsequently arrested and charged with wilful damage and disorderly behaviour.

The identity of the Highlanders involved in the incident weren’t named, nor were they stood down from the franchise’s following match against the Blues in Dunedin.

Three months later, Ioane was one of two players stood down from the Otago squad for their Mitre 10 Cup clash with Northland after they broke team protocol.

Ioane and All Blacks Sevens star Vilimoni Koroi reportedly turned up to training “in an unacceptable state” and were excluded from the province’s match day side to play the Taniwha last October due to breaching the team’s alcohol policy.

The Highlanders currently lie in fifth place on the Super Rugby Aotearoa standings with one win from four matches.

Listen to the latest episode of the Aotearoa Rugby Pod below:

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner
Search