Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'This is the problem with this competition' - Champions Cup format 'can not hold'

Dave Ewers is tackled in Thomond Park /PA

Former Scotland coach Matt Williams has criticised the format of the Heineken Champions Cup after Harlequins were knocked out in dramatic fashion by Montpellier.

ADVERTISEMENT

The London team lost 40-26 in the first leg of the last 16, then won 33-20 at home in the return fixture, but fell short of their French opposition by just one point on aggregate.

Earlier in the tournament, a rise in Covid outbreaks meant each team only played four games in the group stages. Harlequins won all four while Montpellier lost two, including an 89-7 hammering by Leinster.

Video Spacer

The Honey Badger – Nick Cummins joins Ryan and Max | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 29

Video Spacer

The Honey Badger – Nick Cummins joins Ryan and Max | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 29

Williams believes the French side have benefited from the new formatting and thinks their progression to the last eight is not a true representation of their tournament form.

“This is the problem with this competition,” he said on Virgin Media Sport. “Harlequins have five wins, one loss and they’re out of the competition. The team that are through to the quarters have two wins.

“Montpellier have definitely been the best team over the past eight days but they’re making a European quarter-final based on two or three games.”

Williams went on to argue that Harlequins had been the better team across the tournament and deserved more. To further his point, he pointed out that a similar situation could play out today when Racing 92 play Stade Francais. Racing won the first leg 22-9 but their opponents, who have won just one game in the tournament thus far, can still qualify with a big enough margin of victory in the second leg.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If Stade Francais win by 15 points today, they will knock out Racing, who would have won five from six, while Stade will have won just two. That just doesn’t stack up in any competition in the world.”

The last 16 round was introduced this year, along with two legs in the knockout stages, to accommodate more teams in the competition. These changes came into force because of the pandemic and Williams hopes they will not become permanent.

“You can’t have a competition where teams that win only one or two games get to the quarter final and eliminate teams that have won all but one game over the season. It makes the season irrelevant.”

Appearing alongside Williams was former Leinster man Shane Horgan, who thought differently of the situation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s been a very unusual year,” Horgan said. “Covid influenced what we could do before Christmas. This has allowed us to have another round of matches. So far there’s only been one dead rubber – the La Rochelle game.

Related

“Every other game was up for grabs so the team that comes through across two legs deserves to go through. We’re now in the knockout format. That’s the excitement of the cup.”

Williams was still not persuaded.

“This format can’t hold. It has to be a meritocracy.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
R
Roy 977 days ago

Such nonesense.

I am gutted for Quins, and I agree that they're unlucky. They changed the format through what they thought was necessity.

Although some teams have been hard done by, we have to admit, the 2 leg format added some excitement to an often dull tournament.

i
isaac 979 days ago

And the world was jumping up and down about the Super Rugby Pacific format.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search