Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Three key areas for England to beat New Zealand

Owen Farrell will be more important than ever when England take on New Zealand in Yokohama. (Getty Images)

If England are to make it to their fourth Rugby World Cup final on Saturday, not only are they going to need to turn in their performance of the tournament so far, they are also going to have to buck the form books and record their first win over New Zealand since 2012.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eddie Jones’ side are capable of beating the All Blacks, certainly, having impressed over the past four years, whilst New Zealand’s aura of invincibility has been dealt a number of blows by the British and Irish Lions, Ireland, South Africa and Australia. That said, England will need to be firing on all cylinders in Yokohama if they are to end their six-match losing streak against the southern hemisphere team.

The knowledge that they can do it will not be alien to the England side, with Ben Youngs, Owen Farrell, Manu Tuilagi and Mako Vunipola all having been involved in the win in 2012 and all likely to start on Saturday. Jonathan Joseph, Courtney Lawes and Dan Cole were part of that 2012 group, too, and Jones could use all three when he names his side tomorrow.

We have taken a look at three key areas where those players and the rest of the England team will need to be at their very best if they are to unseat the reigning world champions and give themselves a shot at their second world title.

Pressure the lineout

New Zealand’s lineout is the peerless set-piece of world rugby. England’s may statistically match up, but the multitude of options that New Zealand have, which includes perhaps the best three attacking jumpers in the international arena in Kieran Read, Brodie Retallick and Sam Whitelock, and the difficulty that opposition teams have of reading and disrupting the unit, is highly impressive.

This puts an onus on Maro Itoje to step up and be able to challenge, ideally by stealing ball, but failing that at least disrupting and slowing down the service New Zealand can give to Aaron Smith. The All Blacks are deadly in the first couple of phases off of set-piece and England will need to deny them those opportunities as much as possible. If Lawes retains his starting spot – and this could be a good reason why he might – he will need to aid Itoje in putting that pressure on. Lawes is one of the best in the Gallagher Premiership at doing just that.

Balance of line-speed and tackling efficiency

The All Blacks are powerful and they are elusive, something which is illustrated by their 89 clean breaks so far this tournament, a figure which has them comfortably at the top of the charts. Teams that can get up fast and into the faces of New Zealand have historically had a level of success in countering their silky ball-handling and smart decision-making.

ADVERTISEMENT

Equally, however, England cannot afford to sacrifice their efficiency in the tackle in order to deliver that line-speed. If the speed and a missed tackle can force New Zealand back inside, then that should be job done with the covering defence coming across. If the tackle is missed and New Zealand can carry straight through, over or to the outside of the would-be tackler, then England will be in plenty of trouble. This is the biggest test of John Mitchell’s tenure as England’s defence coach, and his charges will need to be quick, physical and smart for 80 minutes.

Farrell has to fire

Even if England can do both of those previous things well and consistently, they are still, almost certainly, going to concede tries. They won’t be able to contain New Zealand and let them punch themselves out, just as they did to Australia last week, as the All Blacks will manufacture enough space and opportunities to cross the whitewash. As such, England need to be able to do the same and that requires Farrell, whether at 10 or at 12, to fire offensively.

His flat, defence-beating pass to Kyle Sinckler was an example of the strings that Farrell is capable of pulling and he will need to create opportunities for England. Tuilagi is a player that New Zealand will be very wary of and Farrell will need to play the Leicester Tiger into the right positions, but also be aware of what other opportunities Tuilagi’s presence alone creates for the rest of the team. England’s playmaker will be under pressure to kick accurately, defend as well as he did against Australia and be the creative spark to help his side unlock New Zealand’s underrated defence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch: Eddie Jones claims England were spied on in training

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 19 minutes ago
Jake White: If I was England coach, I’d have been livid

I am not an England fan, but still very disappointed at what Borthwick is serving up. Regardless of winning or losing, they should be executing the basics at a world class level. That was the reason they replaced Eddie with Steve. After two years England has not built the solid foundations that the RFU were presumably after. Its hard to see it as anything other than a coaching problem.


Having said that I really hope that Rassie has got his team fired up for the game. The Boks at maximum intensity and with no crises (eg red cards) would be expected to win this game. But it does not take much reduction in pressure for Bok teams to lose. The Boks lose when complacency sets in.


On Felix Jones, my guess is that they can't agree on a non-compete so they kept him on payroll for the duration of the Nov tests. The risk was that he would be hired by Rassie or Razor prior to the tests.


As relates to law tweaking, it feels like WR are more comfortable discussing changes in laws than insisting on implementation. For my money the biggest thing they could do is to be strict and consistent in officiating ruck behavior. In every game we see flopping, lazy lying, clearing of unbound players, making plays while off your feet, delays in placing the ball, side entry, offside line infringements, and similar nonsense. It's really really bad, and the WR attitude seems to be that we should turn a blind eye in pursuit of "flowing rugby". In truth it's just boring, because it randomizes the outcome.

9 Go to comments
N
NH 2 hours ago
Battle of the breakdown to determine Wallabies’ grand slam future

Nice one John. I agree that defence (along with backfield kick receipt/positioning) remains their biggest issue, but that I did see some small improvements in it despite the scoreline like the additional jackal attempts from guys like tupou and the better linespeed in tight. But, I still see two issues - 1) yes they are jackaling, but as you point out they aren't slowing the ball down. I think some dark arts around committing an extra tackler, choke tackles, or a slower roll away etc could help at times as at the moment its too easy for oppo teams to get quick ball (they miss L wright). Do you have average ruck speed? I feel like teams are pretty happy these days to cop a tackle behind the ad line if they still get quick ball... and 2) I still think the defence wide of the 3-4th forward man out looks leaky and disconnected and if sua'ali'i is going to stay at 13 I think we could see some real pressure through that channel from other teams. The wallabies discipline has improved and so they are giving away less 3 pt opportunities and kicks into their 22 via penalty. Now, they need to be able to force teams to turnover the ball and hold them out. They scramble quite well once a break is made, but they seem to need the break to happen first... Hunter, marika and daugunu were other handy players to put ruck pressure on. Under rennie, they used to counter ruck quite effectively to put pressure on at the b/down as well.

3 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ England and their Chief problem England and their Chief problem
Search