Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Three key areas for England to beat New Zealand

Owen Farrell will be more important than ever when England take on New Zealand in Yokohama. (Getty Images)

If England are to make it to their fourth Rugby World Cup final on Saturday, not only are they going to need to turn in their performance of the tournament so far, they are also going to have to buck the form books and record their first win over New Zealand since 2012.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eddie Jones’ side are capable of beating the All Blacks, certainly, having impressed over the past four years, whilst New Zealand’s aura of invincibility has been dealt a number of blows by the British and Irish Lions, Ireland, South Africa and Australia. That said, England will need to be firing on all cylinders in Yokohama if they are to end their six-match losing streak against the southern hemisphere team.

The knowledge that they can do it will not be alien to the England side, with Ben Youngs, Owen Farrell, Manu Tuilagi and Mako Vunipola all having been involved in the win in 2012 and all likely to start on Saturday. Jonathan Joseph, Courtney Lawes and Dan Cole were part of that 2012 group, too, and Jones could use all three when he names his side tomorrow.

We have taken a look at three key areas where those players and the rest of the England team will need to be at their very best if they are to unseat the reigning world champions and give themselves a shot at their second world title.

Pressure the lineout

New Zealand’s lineout is the peerless set-piece of world rugby. England’s may statistically match up, but the multitude of options that New Zealand have, which includes perhaps the best three attacking jumpers in the international arena in Kieran Read, Brodie Retallick and Sam Whitelock, and the difficulty that opposition teams have of reading and disrupting the unit, is highly impressive.

This puts an onus on Maro Itoje to step up and be able to challenge, ideally by stealing ball, but failing that at least disrupting and slowing down the service New Zealand can give to Aaron Smith. The All Blacks are deadly in the first couple of phases off of set-piece and England will need to deny them those opportunities as much as possible. If Lawes retains his starting spot – and this could be a good reason why he might – he will need to aid Itoje in putting that pressure on. Lawes is one of the best in the Gallagher Premiership at doing just that.

Balance of line-speed and tackling efficiency

The All Blacks are powerful and they are elusive, something which is illustrated by their 89 clean breaks so far this tournament, a figure which has them comfortably at the top of the charts. Teams that can get up fast and into the faces of New Zealand have historically had a level of success in countering their silky ball-handling and smart decision-making.

ADVERTISEMENT

Equally, however, England cannot afford to sacrifice their efficiency in the tackle in order to deliver that line-speed. If the speed and a missed tackle can force New Zealand back inside, then that should be job done with the covering defence coming across. If the tackle is missed and New Zealand can carry straight through, over or to the outside of the would-be tackler, then England will be in plenty of trouble. This is the biggest test of John Mitchell’s tenure as England’s defence coach, and his charges will need to be quick, physical and smart for 80 minutes.

Farrell has to fire

Even if England can do both of those previous things well and consistently, they are still, almost certainly, going to concede tries. They won’t be able to contain New Zealand and let them punch themselves out, just as they did to Australia last week, as the All Blacks will manufacture enough space and opportunities to cross the whitewash. As such, England need to be able to do the same and that requires Farrell, whether at 10 or at 12, to fire offensively.

His flat, defence-beating pass to Kyle Sinckler was an example of the strings that Farrell is capable of pulling and he will need to create opportunities for England. Tuilagi is a player that New Zealand will be very wary of and Farrell will need to play the Leicester Tiger into the right positions, but also be aware of what other opportunities Tuilagi’s presence alone creates for the rest of the team. England’s playmaker will be under pressure to kick accurately, defend as well as he did against Australia and be the creative spark to help his side unlock New Zealand’s underrated defence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch: Eddie Jones claims England were spied on in training

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search