Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Three members of Wayne Pivac's Wales squad struck down by coronavirus

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Wayne Pivac has revealed three players in his Wales squad were struck down by the coronavirus but have since successfully recovered. His team’s most recent fixture, the March 14 Guinness Six Nations clash with Scotland in Cardiff, was only called off at the 11th hour after officials finally realised the potential danger to health and safety in hosting a capacity 72,000 crowd at the Principality Stadium. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Welsh rugby soon went into lockdown following that match on-match off drama, but those measures haven’t been enough to keep everyone immune to the virus outbreak. 

Speaking on New Zealand TV channel 1 NEWS after the first four matches in his tenure as new Wales boss, Pivac said: “It’s ripping through the communities here. At the moment we’ve had two or three cases that I’m aware of within our squad.”

Video Spacer

RugbyPass recaps our FIFA charity tournament ahead of the final between Mako Vunipola and Denis Buckley

Video Spacer

RugbyPass recaps our FIFA charity tournament ahead of the final between Mako Vunipola and Denis Buckley

While those players have thankfully recovered, the impact of the pandemic on the sport in Wales has been grave with pay cuts required to keep the business ticking over amid fears that the rest of the Test rugby calendar for 2020 – including Wales’ July trip to Pivac’s native New Zealand – could be cancelled due to the global health crisis.

“I don’t think anyone wants these games to be cancelled, we need them to be played. We need the money into the game for the game to survive. We’re all in the same boat there.”

Aside from having the postponed fixture with Scotland to fit in, Wales have a hectic November planned with matches set to be staged in Cardiff versus Fiji, New Zealand, Argentina and world champions South Africa, games they would hope go ahead as scheduled to provide some much-needed revenue.  

Pivac’s early results in the Welsh job have been testing, his team losing to Ireland, France and England following an opening-round Six Nations win at the Principality over Italy. 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search