Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

That time everyone in New Zealand DID support the Crusaders

Crusaders fans went worldwide in 2011

‘We’ll be cheering on the Lions next week’. That was the post match reaction of Hurricanes captain Dane Coles, after their semi final loss in Johannesburg. Cue the debate about whether it’s unpatriotic to support a non-Kiwi team in the 2017 Super Rugby final.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s get one thing straight here – there is a lot of angst between NZ Super Rugby teams. Everyone hated the Blues back when they were winning titles, then everyone hated the Crusaders. There’s well-documented hate between the Chiefs and all other teams, while the Highlanders harbour resentment for their habit of getting the best out of everyone else’s discarded players.

While what Coles said isn’t exactly a unanimous sentiment, it shouldn’t come as any surprise. But there was one time that even the most cold-hearted Kiwi rugby fan couldn’t help but admire the feats of a rival team.

2011 was, from a Super Rugby perspective, a long time ago. There were only 15 teams and no break in the middle of the competition. The Blues and Reds were actually good, as opposed to the ongoing travesties they are now. One of this year’s finalists, the Lions, came in a paltry second to last overall with a 3-1-12 record.

But the story of that season was that of the other team still alive in 2017 – the Crusaders. It’s one of suddenly finding themselves homeless, traveling to the other side of the world and coming within a try of winning a competition they could’ve legitimately dropped out of and no one would’ve held it against them.

On February 22nd, 2011, Christchurch was hit with an earthquake that measured 6.3 on the Richter scale. Unlike other parts of the country where faultlines were well-known, Christchurch was ill-equipped for the event. The mostly stone central city crumbled and fell and, tragically, 185 people were killed.

The Crusaders’ home ground of Lancaster Park was among the many structures rendered unsafe. As well as that, the playing surface was wrecked due to the amount of silt that the quake had driven to the surface.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a week into the season. The team had suffered a first round loss to the Blues, and were drawn to play the Hurricanes in Wellington in round two. There was no way that fixture could happen, given the amount of disruption the quake had caused that week. But the decision was made for the Crusaders to play out the season, making do with the resources that were still left to them.

That included a pretty handy team. Dan Carter, Sonny Bill Williams and Kieran Read were the biggest names, but the year also was the high water mark for the careers of Robbie Fruean, Shaun Maitland and Zac Guildford. Richie McCaw sat out most of the season with injury, but a young Matt Todd was a more than useful replacement.

In a cruelly ironic twist, the Crusaders’ first game after the quake was supposed to be a tribute to another tragedy that struck the region a few months earlier. Wearing the jerseys of the tiny West Coast union to honour the 29 men who were killed in the Pike River Mine Disaster, the Crusaders ran out 34-18 winners over the Waratahs in Nelson.

Other home games were hastily rescheduled for Nelson and Timaru, however the most ambitious workaround came in the form of a proposed game at Twickenham against the Sharks. To everyone’s surprise, it got the green light. The two sides put on a memorable display of Southern Hemisphere rugby in front of 35,000 spectators, and raised almost a million dollars for the earthquake relief fund.

ADVERTISEMENT

By the end of the round robin, the seven-time champions had fashioned an 11 win, one draw and four loss record to sit in third behind the Reds and Stormers. They managed to breeze past the Sharks again at Trafalgar Park in Nelson – a somewhat less grand venue than Twickers – then surprisingly comfortably beat the Stormers in Cape Town to book a place in the final with the Reds.

By that stage the team had traveled well over 100,000 kms. These days the Sunwolves rack up that sort of distance too, but at least they know about their schedule earlier than a week into the season.

If it were a Hollywood movie, then it would’ve been the Crusaders that scored the match winning try off a piece of brilliance. Except someone read the script wrong and it was Will Genia that dashed 65 metres to score the match winner.

The Crusaders returned home empty-handed to a broken city. However, they’d won endless respect for their achievements against adversity.

Later in 2011, the All Blacks won their first World Cup in 24 years. Christchurch’s games were all rescheduled for other cities, and ever since fans in the Garden City have had to put up with a makeshift stadium made out of scaffolding. To this day, Lancaster Park still stands, abandoned.

A lot of the key men have gone – Richie to retirement, Dan to a big pile of cash in France, SBW to the Chiefs, the NRL and the Blues, Maitland to his recently discovered Scottish roots and, sadly, Fruean to indifferent form.

So while there will definitely be a lot Kiwis supporting the Lions this Sunday morning, at least the Crusaders can boast about the time that they were the only Super Rugby team everyone got in behind – and the unbelievable circumstances it took them to do it.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 1 minute ago
'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

4 Go to comments
N
Nickers 10 minutes ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Very poor understanding of what's going on and 0 ability to read. When I say playing behind the gain line you take this to mean all off-loads and site times we are playing in front of the gain line???


Every time we play a lot of rugby behind the gain line (for clarity, meaning trying to build an attack and use width without front foot ball 5m+ behind the most recent breakdown) we go backwards and turn the ball over in some way. Every time a player is tackled behind the most recent breakdown you need more and more people to clear out because your forwards have to go back around the corner, whereas opposition players can keep moving forward. Eventually you run out of either players to clear out or players to pass to and the result in a big net loss of territory and often a turnover. You may have witnessed that 20+ times in the game against England. This is a particularly dumb idea inside your own 40m which is where, for some reason, we are most likely to employ it.


The very best ABs teams never built an identity around attacking from poor positions. The DC era team was known for being the team that kicked the most. To engineer field position and apply pressure, and create broken play to counter attack. This current team is not differentiating between when a defence has lost it's structure and there are opportunities, and when they are completely set and there is nothing on. The reason they are going for 30 minute + periods in every game without scoring a single point, even against Japan and a poor Australian team, is because they are playing most of their rugby on the back foot in the wrong half.

43 Go to comments
N
Nickers 39 minutes ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

I thought we made a lot of progress against that type of defence by the WC last year. Lots of direct running and punching holes rather than using width. Against that type of defence I think you have to be looking to kick on first phase when you have front foot ball which we did relatively successfully. We are playing a lot of rugby behind the gain line at the moment. They are looking for those little interchanges for soft shoulders and fast ball or off loads but it regularly turns into them battering away with slow ball and going backwards, then putting in a very rushed kick under huge pressure.


JB brought that dimension when he first moved into 12 a couple of years ago but he's definitely not been at his best this year. I don't know if it is because he is being asked to play a narrow role, or carrying a niggle or two, but he does not look confident to me. He had that clean break on the weekend and stood there like he was a prop who found himself in open space and didn't know what to do with the ball. He is still a good first phase ball carrier though, they use him a lot off the line out to set up fast clean ball, but I don't think anyone is particularly clear on what they are supposed to do at that point. He was used really successfully as a second playmaker last year but I don't think he's been at that role once this year. He is a triple threat player but playing a very 1 dimensional role at the moment. He and Reiko have been absolutely rock solid on defence which is why I don't think there will be too much experimentation or changes there.

43 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors Scott Robertson responds about handling errors
Search