Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Time for the All Blacks to fast-track their exciting youngsters

Samisoni Taukei'aho and Leicester Fainga'anuku. (Photos by Getty Images)

18 months out from the 2023 Rugby World Cup, New Zealand could be set for a changing of the guard.

Typically, a slew of star All Blacks call time on their international careers following the four-yearly tournament. After 2011, John Afoa, Brad Thorn and Mils Muliaina all departed the shores of Aotearoa while Tony Woodcock, Ben Franks, Keven Mealamu, Richie McCaw, Dan Carter, Colin Slade, Ma’a Nonu and Conrad did the same four years later.

ADVERTISEMENT

Following the last World Cup in Japan, however, the departures were minimal: Matt Todd, Kieran Read, Sonny Bill Williams and Ben Smith. While the decision to leave the latter two out of the semi-final clash with England was widely questioned, the fact of the matter is Read was the only one of the four to feature in the All Blacks’ top side at the time.

The fact that so few All Blacks left New Zealand following the 2019 tournament, coupled with the impacts of Covid allowing for extended squads over the past two seasons has seen the squad selections remain relatively consistent since Ian Foster took charge following the era of Steve Hansen.

Video Spacer

How the Super Rugby Pacific final has impacted the All Blacks.

Video Spacer

How the Super Rugby Pacific final has impacted the All Blacks.

Having had to select ‘just’ 36 players for the upcoming series with Ireland, however, Foster has seemingly swung the guillotine over a number of test careers.

While men like Luke Jacobson, Braydon Ennor and Asafo Aumua still have plenty of time to bounce back from their disappointment of missing the cut and push for spots at the 2023 and 2017 World Cups, the future is a bit grimmer for other more senior players.

Shannon Frizell, Brad Weber, TJ Perenara, George Bridge all featured at the 2019 Rugby World Cup but have missed selection for the tests with Ireland.

While none of those players were first-choice options for the All Blacks last year, they have all add ample opportunities over the past few years to press for starting spots and come up short. That’s not a criticism – there’s certainly nothing wrong with being only the second-best player in your position in New Zealand, but the fact of the matter is they’ve struggled to push their positional rivals to take their games to the next level, and now they’ve paid the price.

ADVERTISEMENT

Foster and his fellow selectors will now be hoping that some of the new talent in the squad can – at the very minimum – snap at the heels of the senior operators ahead of them in the queue. In the best-case scenario for the All Blacks, however, they wouldn’t just be forcing the proven performers to up their games, they’d be forcing their way into the match-day 23 and starting line-up.

With both Weber and Perenara out of the squad, Folau Faktava and Finlay Christie only have an ageing Aaron Smith ahead of them in the pecking order. While Christie is technically the more senior of the young halfbacks, Fakatava is the man who could be pressing Smith hard for game time as the international campaign progresses and, if his form at Super Rugby level over the past few years is anything to go by, should have an all but permanent hold on the All Blacks No 21 jersey by season’s end.

Related

It’s a similar story on the wings. With Jordie Barrett likely to stay at fullback, despite spending some time in the midfield for the Hurricanes throughout the season, that leaves Will Jordan, Sevu Reece, Caleb Clarke and Leicester Fainga’anuku competing for spots in the No 11 and No 14 jerseys. Jordan and Reece may be the more experienced figures, but Clarke and Fainga’anuku boast power that can’t be replicated by the current incumbents – and that power may be too hard for Foster and co to ignore.

Already we know that a number of players who featured for the All Blacks against Ireland last year won’t be present for July’s clashes but, perhaps more importantly, New Zealand are finally moving away from some of the older players who haven’t quite cut the mustard in the past.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even in roles where senior figures have been retained, there will be opportunities for youngsters to prove their worth. After two years effectively serving as an apprentice in the squad, Tupou Vaa’i is now very much at the point where he’s ready to be tried in the big matches – and there’s a massive upside to getting him up to speed, given his age. Samisoni Taukei’aho is in a similar boat and it wouldn’t surprise to also see Quinn Tupaea given more minutes in 2022 after a solid debut season last year.

By the end of the year, players such as Fakatava, Fainga’anuku and Vaa’i could be well entrenched in the All Blacks’ top line-up – whether that’s as starters or in bench roles. For New Zealand’s sake, it’s important that these young players are given ample chances to step up in 2022 as next year will be too late, and the performance of some of the more senior figures over the past two years doesn’t necessarily bode well for the World Cup – especially if they’re expected to be the top performers in the squad.

It would be a crying shame if, by the time the All Blacks take on England in their final match of the year, the same old crowd that have been struggling to keep up with the standards required of international rugby are being marched out at Twickenham – and that means succession planning must get under way next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 1 hour ago
'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

4 Go to comments
N
Nickers 1 hour ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Very poor understanding of what's going on and 0 ability to read. When I say playing behind the gain line you take this to mean all off-loads and site times we are playing in front of the gain line???


Every time we play a lot of rugby behind the gain line (for clarity, meaning trying to build an attack and use width without front foot ball 5m+ behind the most recent breakdown) we go backwards and turn the ball over in some way. Every time a player is tackled behind the most recent breakdown you need more and more people to clear out because your forwards have to go back around the corner, whereas opposition players can keep moving forward. Eventually you run out of either players to clear out or players to pass to and the result in a big net loss of territory and often a turnover. You may have witnessed that 20+ times in the game against England. This is a particularly dumb idea inside your own 40m which is where, for some reason, we are most likely to employ it.


The very best ABs teams never built an identity around attacking from poor positions. The DC era team was known for being the team that kicked the most. To engineer field position and apply pressure, and create broken play to counter attack. This current team is not differentiating between when a defence has lost it's structure and there are opportunities, and when they are completely set and there is nothing on. The reason they are going for 30 minute + periods in every game without scoring a single point, even against Japan and a poor Australian team, is because they are playing most of their rugby on the back foot in the wrong half.

43 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Everyone is saying the same thing after agonising England loss Everyone is saying the same thing after agonising England loss
Search