Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Tony Brown's bench tactics must come under question after Highlanders' loss

Josh Timu and Tony Brown. (Photos by Getty Images)

For the first 15 minutes of the Highlanders’ clash with the Crusaders in Dunedin on Friday night, the home side looked on track to set a record-winning margin over their southern rivals for the second year on the trot.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Highlanders forwards were churning through the metres and the defending bodies on attack, Aaron Smith was delivering slick service to the backs and men such as midfielder Fetuli Paea and outside backs Sam Gilbert and Josh Timu looked that much more dangerous and incisive than they had the week prior against the Chiefs in Queenstown.

Up 13-0 with less than a quarter of the game played and all the momentum in their favour, the Highlanders looked poised to kick on and lay down a marker in the early rounds of Super Rugby Pacific.

Video Spacer

Pablo Matera joins the Aotearoa Rugby Pod.

Video Spacer

Pablo Matera joins the Aotearoa Rugby Pod.

Then disaster struck.

In the same passage of play, Timu sustained an injury to his right leg while Crusaders winger Sevu Reece managed to fight his way over the try-line from a five-metre penalty.

Reece’s score halted the Highlanders’ march but even from the next kick-off, it was clear that the fight hadn’t left the home team.

The more pressing issue was Timu’s injury, which left him limping around the park, but didn’t immediately force him from the field.

Moments later, the Crusaders exploited Timu’s obvious discomfort, with Will Jordan popping a kick over the top of the Highlander’s head for Reece to run on to.

ADVERTISEMENT

The man who’d scored the Crusaders’ opening try just moments earlier collected the ball – with Timu not able to turn and chase with any real conviction – and sent a kick into the Highlanders 22, where Mitch Hunt collected the ball and kicked the ball out under pressure, handing the Crusaders a prime attacking opportunity.

Highlanders coach Tony Brown had seen enough and understandably hooked Timu from the field.

In most situations, losing an outside back so early in the match wouldn’t be a death knell to any team’s fortunes, but Brown had rolled the dice with his team selections and named just two backs in the reserves, halfback Folau Fakatava and pivot Marty Banks.

Banks entered the fray in Timu’s place and from that point on, the Highlanders never really looked the same on attack.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

For all of Banks’ years of experience and nous – this is the man who kicked a drop goal to cement the Highlanders their first and only Super Rugby title back in 2015, remember – the 32-year-old could hardly be called a dynamic ball-running option and quickly slotted in at fullback, and Connor Garden-Bachop, one of the best attackers in the Highlanders’ arsenal, switching onto the wing.

One injury had effectively forced a complete reshuffle of the Highlanders backline and while Brown had indicated they were going for a more conservative mindset against the Crusaders than they had the week before, with Mosese Dawai and Scott Gregory both dropping out of the 23, they appeared to have lost all their attacking nous once Timu left the park.

Thomas Umaga-Jensen and Garden-Bachop – two men who returned to the starting line-up for the first time after long stints on the sidelines and two of the Highlanders’ more potent attacking options – were rarely given the ball with room to move in the second half while Hunt, perched at the back, simply didn’t have the gas to ignite his side’s counter-attack.

The game ended 34-19 in the Crusaders’ favour, with the Highlanders not even earning themselves a losing bonus point.

“We’ve always sort of favoured the 6-2 split previously,” Brown said of his forwards-backs split ahead of the game.

“We just feel as though our loose forwards are a big strength of ours. We feel that both Hugh [Renton] and Marino [Mikaele-Tu’u] can give us a massive impact off the bench so looking forward to getting them out there and seeing what they can do.”

Related

Unfortunately, Timu’s early injury meant the Highlanders never got to make the most of their extra loose forward on the bench. Hugh Renton remained on the sidelines until the final five minutes of the match, presumably in the event that another injury occurred, which would have forced the Highlanders to play with just 14 men.

Brown’s justification for wanting an extra loose forward in the reserves is sound enough but it’s a policy that can leave your team hamstrung if one of your backs is struck down by injury early – which is hardly an unfathomable event in this day and age of attritional rugby and exactly what happened on Friday night.

Dawai and Gregory may not have covered themselves in glory against the Chiefs but they certainly didn’t go from being good enough to start a Super Rugby match to not being worthy of even a spot on the bench, and the selection tactic employed by Brown was badly found out against the Crusaders.

The best-case scenario would have seen the Highlanders introduce some fresh legs to their loose forwards later in the piece, which is a small upside, while the worst-case scenario is considerably more impactful and potentially cost the Highlanders the match.

As Brown alluded to, it’s a tactic the Highlanders have employed regularly in the past, with an additional loose forward being named on the bench in every match bar two last year, and evidently Brown has seen enough in those games to determine it’s the right way forward.

Curiously, it’s not a tactic any of the other New Zealand Super Rugby sides have ever employed, despite some of them arguably boasting stronger depth in the loose forwards than the southerners.

Tony Brown is one of the most tactically astute coaches in New Zealand and it would be wrong to suggest outright that there isn’t any merit to doubling up loose forwards on the bench.

However, after Friday night’s defeat, Brown may want to rethink the tactic lest another similar situation unfurls in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search