Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Too much responsibility’: All Blacks greats weigh in on Ruben Love debate

Ruben Love of the Hurricanes in action during the round one Super Rugby Pacific match between Western Force and Hurricanes at HBF Park, on February 23, 2024, in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Legendary All Blacks Jeff Wilson, Mils Muliaina and Sir John Kirwan have unanimously agreed that one of New Zealand’s brightest rugby prospects, Ruben Love, is better off at fullback.

ADVERTISEMENT

Love, now 22, debuted for the Hurricanes off the bench in Super Rugby Aotearoa a few years ago before going on to play six matches as the team’s starting No. 10 in 2020.

While the playmaker impressed as one of the Hurricanes’ options at flyhalf, Love slowly began to shift into a new role as he started three matches at fullback the following year.

Injuries aside, Love has played plenty of rugby out the back, including the All Blacks XV’s win over Ireland A in Dublin a couple of years ago and the Hurricanes’ Super Rugby Pacific season-opener in Perth last Friday night.

Love stood out as the Hurricanes ran away with a commanding 44-14 win over the Western Force at HBF Park. But the New Zealander did that at fullback, not at flyhalf.

“I really enjoyed what he’s doing,” former All Black Jeff Wilson said on Sky Sport NZ’s The Breakdown.

“(Last week) I talked about whether he’d play 10 or 15 but at the moment it’s in the 15 jersey for me.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I just want him to stay healthy, I said that last week. I really like the skillset, I like his intent, he’s a competitor, you know that… he’s got great feet.

“I’m just really impressed. It was just nice to see him get a good start to the season.”

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
2
2
Tries
6
2
Conversions
4
0
Drop Goals
0
96
Carries
112
5
Line Breaks
7
13
Turnovers Lost
14
6
Turnovers Won
6

Love showed some masterful skill to lay the foundations for Jordi Viljoen’s try on debut for the Hurricanes. But that was just one highlight.

The fullback finished the night with an impressive knock on the stat sheet, with Love running the ball seven times for 88 metres and making two line breaks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Echoing the sentiment of Wilson’s comments, Rugby World Cup-winning All Black Mils Muliaina said the Hurricanes would be giving Love “too much responsibility” if they chose to move him.

“I think he’s best suited at 15. He’s got that sort of ability,” Muliaina said.

“His flair, and he’s been out for a while, so putting him in at 10 I think just gives him too much responsibility initially but I think his position is fullback.

“The way he attacks, his mindset is to attack first.”

Prompted to add to the discussion by Muliaina, another Rugby World Cup winner agreed that Love is a fullback and that shouldn’t change for now.

“One or the other for me,” Kirwan added.

“I think Barrett can do it, (play) 10 and 15, maybe (Stephen) Perofeta can, but I actually don’t think that everyone can.

“For me, Love needs to stay at fullback if he’s going to have a crack or they need to put him at 10 and he needs to stay there.

“When you’re a mature 10 you can go back, possibly, but I just think he’s got a lot of ability and I like him at 15.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
R
Red and White Dynamight 301 days ago

Canes should leave Aidan Morgan at 10, huge potential.

J
Jasyn 301 days ago

Plenty of potential fullback options, not a lot of quality ones at 10 outside of high risk Dmac or the even flakier Perofeta, whose game spirals out of control if he starts badly.

Love would be worth looking at as a 10. To say it’s ‘too much responsibility’ doesn't show a lot of confidence in the guy.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 29 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search