Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Torrid weekend in France for Wales Women shows huge failings at WRU

Wales lock Gwen Crabb (Photo by DAMIEN MEYER/AFP via Getty Images)

At Swansea University, I was part of the same rugby club as current Wales Women Cara Hope, Natalia John, Robyn Lock and Courtney Keight. I wasn’t good enough at rugby to play alongside them, but they are my friends and I watched them every week and trained with them. Wales captain Siwan Lillicrap was head of rugby at the university while I was there (and still is). Wales hooker Kelsey Jones coached the first team for a while. I also spent many Sundays at Swansea RFC watching the women’s team play – which included some of the Wales team who played this weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

I tell you this because I talk from experience when I say how hard Wales Women work. I remember a conversation I had with Siwan, three years ago or so, where she told me about her hectic week.

Between Monday-Friday she worked full-time at Swansea Uni, coached the university players two or three nights a week, trained two or three nights a week, did her gym work in her own time and tried to find time for family and friends around that. She also regularly had to travel around the country on Wednesdays as a coach for university fixtures. Her weekends were spent training and playing games for club, region, or country.

Video Spacer

Devin Toner talks to Big Jim:

Video Spacer

Devin Toner talks to Big Jim:

At this point the number eight was playing for Swansea WRFC, her region Ospreys, and Wales. Both clubs were close by to home in Swansea and the Wales training ground is about 40 minutes down the M4 in Cardiff. She wasn’t yet having to make the three-hour round-trip to Bristol for training.

I haven’t seen Siwan since she started playing for Bristol Bears but we keep in touch and I have no doubt she is still just as busy, if not more so. She is no exception – most of Wales Women are in full-time work or education. If Welsh women’s rugby players want to play regular elite rugby then they have to play for an English club, meaning long journeys across the border for the players, as the Welsh regional competition – unfit for purpose in my opinion – has not been running this year.

I know that Siwan will hate all the praise I give her. As well as being an absolute workhorse on and off the pitch, she is one of the most modest, hardworking, and passionate people I know. It’s why she is often compared to Alun Wyn Jones, her male counterpart who matches her pride in a Welsh jersey. They have also both captained Ospreys and Wales and both went to Swansea University (all the best people did). I don’t like the constant comparisons between women’s and men’s rugby players, but these comparisons do sometimes help to show the difference in support from unions and to familiarise fans with the women’s players. While Alun Wyn is heralded as the most patriotic Welsh player of all time, I would look closer to the women who wear the jersey for no money than the men who (comparatively) make a fortune.

The Wales Women pull on the red jersey for nothing but pride, honour and privilege, and they knew what they were signing up for. I don’t claim to speak on the behalf of all Wales Women, but the above context is important before we talk about the result against France.

ADVERTISEMENT

This weekend, Wales Women had a hammering from semi-professional home-side France in Pool B of this year’s Women’s Six Nations. Within the first 14 minutes France winger Caroline Boujard scored a hat-trick, with France scoring eight unanswered tries against Wales for a 53-0 win. The new attacking style of play from Wales had been given some hype before the game, under new coach Warren Abrahams, but we didn’t see much of it.

The game wasn’t entirely negative for Wales with a stronger second half performance. It was always going to be a difficult game and France are very likely to top their group. Wales have had just four months with Abrahams after a turbulent year following the sudden departure of former head coach Rowland Phillips.

Wales will face Ireland on Saturday and a closer match is likely. Ireland is also an amateur side and the teams have had close contests in previous years.

Some on social media are quick to judge the Welsh side – questioning if the team should have any investment with performances like that. They completely miss the point. Adequate investment isn’t yet there in the women’s game in Wales. The WRU said they would give contracts to the women once a performance criterion had been met, which to me means they will ride on the back of the investment their players receive from the RFU in the Premier 15s until they absolutely have to invest. It’s also about so much more than the money. As Scrumqueens pointed out, even if amateur teams like Wales gave professional contracts tomorrow, the infrastructure needed to push women’s rugby is years behind. In my opinion, the WRU need to urgently sort the regional women’s tournament in Wales, better support their talent pool (insuring them would be a start), and have more open conversations with the RFU about player development.

ADVERTISEMENT

To give an idea of the lifestyle of a Wales player, the kick off was at 9pm on Saturday and the Welsh team had to be on the plane at 8am the following morning to fly home – landing back in the UK less than 12 hours from the full-time whistle. That’s not enough time to shower, debrief, get back to the hotel, eat, sleep, recover, receive treatment and have any sort of rest. Can you imagine the men’s team having to do that? The players I spoke to do not know if there were other flights available or what the reason was for the early morning flight, but it was far from ideal for the battered bodies of the Welsh players.

What we are comparing here is a semi-professional French side with an entirely amateur Welsh set up. Some online have even called Wales semi-professional because some of their players receive payment from clubs. Let me be clear: some Wales women’s players receive match fees from their Premier 15s club. According to players, this often isn’t enough to cover their petrol and some of them now need to pay for their sports insurance too, as their clubs or union won’t. There is no real profit margin here for the players, who also only receive expenses from the WRU when they play for Wales. The ‘semi-pro’ status of some of the players for club is absolutely worlds away from France.

In the France national team, all players receive around a 50% salary from the national team and some receive match day fees for playing at their clubs. France players also have jobs or are in full-time education – it’s a requirement of playing – but the support from the union is much better. Clubs are geared to support the national team and the infrastructure is far, far superior than in Wales.

Money is tight for all unions after a damaging year of financial loss. Money doesn’t grow on trees and has to be invested where it will be most effective. But women’s rugby is growing fast and unions like Wales are at a great risk of being left behind, especially with the new WXV tournament that will further highlight the gaps in the women’s game with more regular international rugby.

Whatever your thoughts on the Wales performance, and you are welcome to be critical, be kind. There’s a huge amount of context that needs to be understood before critiquing player performances.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 37 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search