Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The truth about Ulster Rugby's dwindling finances

Ravenhill (Photo by Clive Rose/Getty Images)

A lot of the chatter at Ulster in the build up to the new season surrounded the “will he – wont he”, the saga of Head Coach Dan McFarland. And as always with pre-season, there has been further chat about recruitment -striking the balance between developing local talent and blowing in sprinkles of stardust.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet one thing remains rarely discussed, Ulster’s ability to pay. Ulster are often thought of as a club with big gates and deep pockets.

But just how deep are they?

The Annual Report for the 2017/18 season makes interesting reading, and my attention was drawn to the Treasurer’s Report buried within.

Video Spacer

This is a must read for any Ulster fan because it’s an honest assessment of where the club has been and where it’s going.

From the 2017/18 Report we learn that Ulster’s gates were down by 1500 on average from the previous season. And season tickets down a significant 600 to 9800 from the year before -representing nearly 6% decrease in total season ticket sales. It’s also clear that from other comments with the report that season ticket sales are predicted to be down again for 2018/19.

The report not only makes a clear forecast for next season but gives reasons, “professional game income has been in a plateau for the last couple of years and this is forecast to fall back during the 2018/19 season due to inconsistency of performances on the pitch and a consequence of off-field issues and coaching changes.”

Getty Images

ADVERTISEMENT

The overall financial picture was salvaged somewhat by the additional two home games -proving Ravenhill matches are still a money spinner. And additional income from the involvement of the South African teams, of approximately £450,000, was largely spent on visiting fly-half Christian Lealiifano.

The fact that Ulster had a surplus against budget of some £254,000 strongly suggests Ulster could comfortably have funded him a little longer, had agreement been reached for him to extend his stay.

But Ulster are limited by virtue of “self-funding” the majority of player wages – with only two of the Belfast club’s players on Ireland contracts – less of a problem at the likes of Leinster or Munster.

Getty Images

Last year some £5.1 million was spent on wages by Ulster, and this represented just under 50% of income. Contrast Ulster’s position with that of the two English teams they faced in last year’s Rugby Champions Cup. Harlequins in the year to June 2017 spend some £12.6 million on wages representing 61% if their turnover and Wasps, in the same period, had a staggering wage bill of £17 million, which was a much lower 51% of their turnover.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s clear that Ulster have shifted their squad focus from stardust to shopping local -or localish given the growing southern presence in the squad. What isn’t as clear though, is how much of this had been driven by strategy and how much of it by less money.

For a season opener at home, the task this weekend couldn’t be tougher – but amongst so much change there’s an important constant – no team likes coming to Belfast -and that includes Scarlets.

It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but ourselves.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 3 hours ago
Brett Robinson looks forward to 'monumental' year in 2025

I'm not very hopeful of a better change to the sport. Putting an Aussie in charge after they failed for two decades is just disgusting. What else will be brought in to weaken the game? What new rule changes will be made? How will the game be grown?


Nothing of value in this letter. There is no definitive drive towards something better. Just more of the same as usual. The most successful WC team is getting snubbed again and again for WC's hosting rights. What will make other competitions any different?


My beloved rugby is already a global sport. Why is there no SH team chosen between the Boks, AB's, Wallabies and Fiji? Like a B&I Lions team to tour Europe and America? A team that could face not only countries but also the B&I Lions? Wouldn't that make for a great spectacle that will also bring lots of eyeballs to the sport?


Instead with an Aussie in charge, rugby will become more like rugby league. Rugby will most likely become less global if we look at what have become of rugby in Australia. He can't save rugby in Australia, how will he improve the global footprint of rugby world wide?


I hope to be proven wrong and that he will raise up the sport to new heights, but I am very much in doubt. It's like hiring a gardener to a CEO position in a global company expecting great results. It just won't happen. Call me negative or call me whatever you'd like, Robinson is the wrong man for the job.

3 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

The question that pops into my mind with Fergus Burke, and a few other high profile players in his boots right now, and also many from the past to be fair, is can the club scene start to take over this sentimentality of test footy being the highest level? Take for a moment a current, modern day scenario of Toulouse having a hiccup and failing to make this years Top 14 Final, we could end up seeing the strongest French side in History touring New Zealand next year. Why? Because at any one time they could make up over half the French side, but although that is largely avoided, it is very likely at the national teams detriment with the understanding these players have of playing together likely being stronger than the sum of the best players throughout France selected on marginal calls.


Would the pinnacle of the game really not be reached in the very near future by playing for a team like Toulouse? Burke might have put himself in a position where holding down a starting spot for any nation, but he could be putting himself in the hotbed of a new scene. Clearly he is a player that cherishes International footy as the highest level, and is possibly underselling himself, but really he might just be underselling these other nations he thinks he could represent.

Burke’s decision to test the waters with either England or Scotland has been thrown head-first into the spotlight by the relative lack of competition for the New Zealand 10 shirt.

This is the most illogical statement I've ever read in one of your articles Nick. Burke is behind 3 All Stars of All Black rugby, it might be a indictment of New Zealand rugby but it is abosolutely apparent (he might have even said so himself) why he decided to test the waters.

He mattered because he is the kind of first five-eighth New Zealand finds it most difficult to produce from its domestic set-up: the strategic schemer, the man who sees all the angles and all the bigger potential pictures with the detail of a single play.

Was it not one of your own articles that highlighted the recent All Black nature to select a running, direct threat, first five over the last decade? There are plenty of current players of Burke's caliber and style that simply don't fit the in vogue mode of what Dan Carter was in peoples minds, the five eight that ran at the slightest hole and started out as a second five. The interesting thing I find with that statement though is that I think he is firmly keeping his options open for a return to NZ.

A Kiwi product no longer belongs to New Zealand, and that is the way it is. Great credo or greater con it may be, but the free market is here to stay.

A very shortsighted and simplistic way to end a great article. You simply aren't going to find these circumstances in the future. The migration to New Zealand ended in 1975, and as that generation phases out, so too will the majority of these ancestry ties (in a rugby context) will end. It would be more accurate to say that Fergus Burke thought of himself as the last to be able to ride this wave, so why not jump on it? It is dying, and not just in the interests or Scottish of English fans.

47 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 2024 was an annus horribilis for Wales, so can 2025 provide an upturn? 2024 was an annus horribilis for Wales, so can 2025 provide an upturn?
Search